Perspectives on antimicrobial resistance: Establishing an interdisciplinary research approach

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 410-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine L. Larson ◽  
◽  
Lisa Saiman ◽  
Janet Haas ◽  
Anna Neumann ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  

Abstract Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the biggest contemporary threats to global health, food security and development. AMR is associated with longer illness, higher mortality and higher health care costs, and threatens the success of many disease interventions including surgery, chemotherapy and the fight against HIV, TB and Malaria. The risks and impacts of AMR are truly universal and global, putting everyone at risk across demographic, socioeconomic and geographic boundaries. AMR is a “wicked” problem driven by a range of complex, structural and interconnected factors, including in sectors related to human health, animal health, agriculture and the environment. Research on AMR is therefore needed not only from, but which bridges across, diverse disciplines including biomedicine, public health and the environmental, animal, social and political sciences. Despite calls for coordinated action on AMR, traditional siloes between sectors and disciplines, and from research to practice, remain difficult to bridge. Many efforts have strengthened communication and coordination but remain essentially focused on “drugs and bugs”, stopping short of achieving the type of radical, integrative and trans-border (disciplinary, sectoral, national, etc) collaboration needed to explore and effectively tackle this complex challenge. The goal of this workshop is to create a space for dedicated discussion between professionals from diverse disciplines, sectors and settings to explore the following questions: What key questions or challenges for understanding and tackling AMR (from a research, policy or practice perspective) need to be explored using an interdisciplinary research approach?What thematic intersections, tensions and synergies exist between different disciplines conducting research on or relevant to AMR? What different theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches can be brought together to answer such questions?How can we create bridges and strengthen solidarity between professionals in different disciplines, sectors and stakeholder groups to foster the type of systematic, inter-/trans-disciplinary research needed? How can we ensure the knowledge generated informs evidence-based policy and practice to effectively and equitably tackle AMR?What initiatives for inter-/trans-disciplinary research on AMR have been effective and what can be learned to inform future research? Following a brief introduction of key concepts and objectives, two presentations will provide input from research on the macro-structural drivers of AMR, which demonstrate the importance and value of different disciplinary research on this topic. A third presentation will explore equity and gender considerations in tackling AMR. The subsequent discussion will examine the above questions by tapping into the expertise, experience and perspectives of the presenters and participants. The workshop will close with a summary of lessons learnt and directions for future research. Key messages New forms of inter- and trans-disciplinary, translational research are needed to understand the complex drivers and dynamics of antimicrobial resistance and how to address this major global threat. Meaningful exchange is needed to identify concrete ways to overcome the methodological, practical and other challenges to conducting systematic, inter-/trans-disciplinary research on AMR.


Author(s):  
Stephen M. Fiore

This symposium provides a complementary set of papers exploring frameworks and models for developing artificial social intelligence (ASI) for teams. ASI consists of components of social cognition that support teamwork and more general interpersonal interactions. Although AI is rapidly evolving and fielded in a variety of operational settings, the implementation of such systems is vastly outpacing our ability to understand how to design and develop technologies appropriately. This symposium is meant to help redress this gap. Consisting of scholars representing the cognitive, computational, and organizational sciences, the papers discuss how they integrate theory and methods to inform development of agents capable of complex collaborative processes. Collectively, these papers synthesize perspectives across disciplines in support of an interdisciplinary research approach for ASL The goal is to contribute to research and development in the area of Human- AI- Robot Teaming effectiveness.


Author(s):  
Zili Yang ◽  
Yi-Ming Wei ◽  
Zhifu Mi

Integrated assessment models (IAMs) for climate change refers to a broad category of research approaches in climate change. Climate change is the most complicated global environmental problem. By the very nature of climate change, research has to be interdisciplinary and multifaceted. IAM is the mainstream methodological approach in climate change research. Most researchers in climate change utilize IAMs directly or indirectly. IAMs draw knowledge and strengths from various disciplines related to climate change; contributions from each discipline rely on the mathematical representations of certain relationships connected to climate change; disciplinary components are linked through a unified modeling platform(s). In particular, IAMs for climate change usually involve social-economic components as well as natural sciences components. The key linkages in IAM platforms are anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in climate systems and climate change impacts on social-economic systems. The outputs of IAMs are numerical simulation results based on assumptions, historical data, and scenario designs. IAMs are widely used in assessing various GHG mitigation policies and climate impacts. In fact, conclusions in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Reports are drawn substantially from numerous IAMs. IAMs for climate change started in the late 1980s. Since then, IAMs for climate change have developed into a full-fledged interdisciplinary research field that involves hundreds of models, thriving online resources, and thousands of academic publications and policy reports around the world. IAM for climate change, as an interdisciplinary research approach, has received recognition by mainstream disciplines. The Dynamic Integrated model of Climate and the Economy (DICE) and the Regional Integrated model of Climate and the Economy (RICE)—two IAMs for climate change—are part of the core contributions in William Nordhaus’s Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences in 2018.


BioScience ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (11) ◽  
pp. 995-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary E. Blair ◽  
Minh D. Le ◽  
Gautam Sethi ◽  
Hoang M. Thach ◽  
Van T. H. Nguyen ◽  
...  

This chapter overviews the purpose of this book and is designed to help the readers leave a legacy, but only by adapting, changing, and designing policies, procedures, and classroom experiences that serve our students will that legacy come to fruition. Institutions with strong visions, missions, and legacies create traditions but also leave room for flexibility to work in this dynamic and changing global environment. In the introductory chapter, the authors seek to define the term post-traditional learner, as well as the interdisciplinary research approach the authors utilize, and share the rationale for the book.


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-357
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Guo ◽  
Meei-Ying Kao

The issue of human rights has gained attention in Taiwan, and this study represents a breakthrough regarding the use of an interdisciplinary research approach that includes a psychological focus. We utilized multiscale questionnaires to test the attitudes toward human rights from different perspectives. The results showed that the following: (1) The modal personalities of Taiwan, namely the authoritarian and dogmatic personalities, are not conducive to the development of human rights; (2) civil liberalism and globalism are good for the development of individual personalities, while patriotism and nationalism are not entirely bad, but support civil constraint; and (3) individuals in favor of civil liberalism are in the minority and face more difficulty in adapting to the Taiwanese environment. Our recommendation is that leaders who are strong in civil liberalism must be elected to encourage a culture of “obedience” and “disparate layout” for the development of human rights in Taiwan.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document