Vertical control of a Class II deep bite malocclusion with the use of orthodontic mini-implants

2019 ◽  
Vol 155 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Ho Jung
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-225
Author(s):  
Soo-Min Gil ◽  
Ji-Yea Lee ◽  
Sang-Cheol Kim ◽  
Kyung-Hwa Kang
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leandro Silva Marques ◽  
Mônica Costa Armond ◽  
Maria Letícia Ramos-Jorge ◽  
Raquel Gonçalves Vieira de Andrade ◽  
Ana Maria Bolognese

Author(s):  
Zahra Ali Mehtari ◽  
Mehdi Rafiei ◽  
Saeed Azarbayjani ◽  
Neda Ahmadi Rouzbehani ◽  
Amir Hossain Moeini

Introduction: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a group of neurodevelopmental disorders diagnosed by impairments in social interaction and communication with repetitive and restrictive stereotyped behavioral patterns. The Prevalence of autism has been reported to be increased in recent years. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of different types of malocclusion among ASD patients in Isfahan in 2018. Materials & Methods: In a descriptive and cross-sectional trial, 92 ASD patients were studied in the age range of 7-18 years at the center for autism patients in Isfahan. Clinical oral examinations of patients are taken to assess the involved malocclusions (Cl I, Cl II and Cl III malocclusions) and malocclusion traits (deep bite, open bite and cross bite) by an educated dental student under the supervision of an orthodontist under natural light. The data are reported using frequency and percentage indices. Results: Class I malocclusion had the highest prevalence 54.3% (50) among ASD patients and the prevalence of class II and class III were found to be 19.6% (18) and 7.6% (7) respectively. The frequency of malocclusions traits of deep bite, cross bite and the open bite were 27.2% (25), 18.5% (17) and 7.6% (7) respectively. Among of the total patients, 65.2% (60) showed normal bite and 18/5% (17) showed Normal occlusion. Conclusion: ASD patients showed class I, class II and class III malocclusions from the most to least frequency and the most frequent malocclusion traits were also deep bite, cross bite and open bite respectively.


Author(s):  
Shamima Nargish ◽  
Md Zakir Hossain

We describe the treatment of a girl, age 18 years with Class II div-2 malocclusion with deep bite and crowding. Treatment consisted mainly of bite opening, 1st premolars extractions, canine retraction, arch co-ordination, leveling and alignment with Edgewise fixed appliances by multiloop technique. However the treatment resulted in Class I incisor relation with proper alignment of upper and lower anterior segment, an ideal overjet, overbite and incisor angulations. Ban J Orthod & Dentofac Orthop, April 2016; Vol-6 (1-2), P.29-34


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 304
Author(s):  
J.-L. Raymond

The orthodontic treatment of severe class II division 1 malocclusions is often difficult, which leads some specialists to offer a surgical correction of the overjet. Treatment is made complex by the value of the horizontal overlap as much as the « depth » of deep bite that is very often present alongside the malocclusion. This is why we are offering a treatment protocol including a FABP (Fixed Anterior Bite Plate) which will allow, if the patient cooperates, to correct the anatomic anomaly while concurrently establishing new masticatory cycles in order to stabilize and preserve the results obtained. It is this systemic approach of treatment that is the focus of this article.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Sarath Babu Balina ◽  
Durga Harsha G V ◽  
Padmapriya C V ◽  
Varma DPK ◽  
Goutham C V

Adult patients with class II malocclusion can be treated routinely by extraction therapy. In the recent decades there was increasing popularity towards non-extraction treatment. Distalization of maxillary molars is one of the prime treatment modality to correct mild to moderate class II malocclusion cases with esthetically acceptable profile. A 16 years old female patient reported with irregularly placed upper front teeth and was diagnosed as Angle’s Class II malocclusion with orthognathic maxilla and mandible, average growth pattern. Treatment was planned to distalize the entire maxillary arch using mini implants as skeletal anchorage. 4.0 mm of maxillary molars were distalized, class I molar and canine relation were achieved bilaterally within span of 10 months without altering the patient’s existing profile.  


2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 70-81
Author(s):  
Osama Hasan Alali

INTRODUCTION: This article demonstrates the description and use of a new appliance for Class II correction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A case report of a 10-year 5 month-old girl who presented with a skeletally-based Class II division 1 malocclusion (ANB = 6.5º) on a slightly low-angle pattern, with ML-NSL angle of 30º and ML-NL angle of 22.5º. Overjet was increased (7 mm) and associated with a deep bite. RESULTS: Overjet and overbite reduction was undertaken with the new appliance, Fixed Lingual Mandibular Growth Modificator (FLMGM). CONCLUSION: FLMGM may be effective in stimulating the growth of the mandible and correcting skeletal Class II malocclusions. Clinicians can benefit from the unique clinical advantages that FLMGM provides, such as easy handling and full integration with bracketed appliance at any phase.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document