scholarly journals Is isolated small head circumference at 20 weeks predictive of FGR or SGA at delivery?

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S204-S205
Author(s):  
Brad Bosse ◽  
Madeline Wetterhahn ◽  
Erin Bailey ◽  
Janine Rhoades ◽  
J. Igor Iruretagoyena ◽  
...  
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-66
Author(s):  
Edward J. O'Connell ◽  
Robert H. Feldt ◽  
Gunnar B. Stickler

The purpose of this study was to re-affirm our clinical impression that non-institutionalized children whose head circumference was below minus 2 standard deviations were mentally subnormal and frequently had growth failure. A group of 134 children with a head circumference below minus 2 standard deviations from the mean were studied, and all but one were mentally subnormal. The most severe mental retardation was noted in the group of children with a head circumference of minus 4 standard deviations or below. We found, as have others, that children with mental retardation have height and weights below the expected norm and that children with a head circumference below minus 2 standard deviations have even lower mean heights and weights. The head circumference of 31 children with growth failure and normal intelligence was normal for age and sex, therefore disproving the concept that the abnormally small child has a proportionally small head. In the child with growth failure, should the head be proportionally small (below minus 2 standard deviations), mental subnormality should be suspected. We feel that the head circumference measurement has taken on new clinical significance in that our data support its use in suspecting the association of mental subnormality in children with growth failure and a head circumference of below minus 2 standard deviations from the mean for age and sex.


1993 ◽  
Vol 162 (4) ◽  
pp. 517-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas F. McNeil ◽  
Elizabeth Cantor-Graae ◽  
Lars G. Nordström ◽  
Thomas Rosenlund

Head circumference, body weight, body length, and shoulder circumference at birth were studied in 70 RDC schizophrenic patients and 70 demographically matched controls from the same delivery series, using information recorded in the medical records at the time of birth. With preterm babies removed from both samples, only head circumference among preschizophrenic infants was significantly smaller than that of controls. Preschizophrenic infants also had a disproportionately smaller head circumference in relation to body length than did controls. Among the former, a small head circumference was systematically related to an absence of family history of psychosis, but was not related to season of birth or recorded pregnancy complications. The findings were strongest for females. The results suggest there is an unidentified non-genetic factor in schizophrenia that disturbs prenatal cerebral development.


BMJ ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 306 (6875) ◽  
pp. 422-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
D J Barker ◽  
C Osmond ◽  
S J Simmonds ◽  
G A Wield

Autism ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1726-1739
Author(s):  
Joel Crucitti ◽  
Christian Hyde ◽  
Peter G Enticott ◽  
Mark A Stokes

Meta-analyses of head circumference in autistic individuals exist; however, simple meta-analytic approaches are limited. Consequently, we gathered head circumference raw data of autistic ( N = 2381) and typically developing participants ( N = 994) by re-analysing the data from previously published studies together. The present study found no mean difference between head circumference of autistic and typically developing individuals, although simple effect analyses revealed smaller mean head circumference in autistic than typically developing females aged 12–17 months. However, compared to controls, the frequency of extreme head circumference in autistic males was greater at birth and between 60 and 100 months. In addition, the frequency of extremely small head circumference between 6 and 11 months, and extremely large head circumference between 12 and 17 months, was greater in autistic than typically developing males. For autistic females, compared to controls, extreme head circumference was more frequent between 36 and 59 months and less frequent at birth. We conclude that it is imperative to consider the effects of age and sex when investigating the relationship between autism diagnosis and head circumference. This variance was more effectively described via the approach of the present study than previous meta-analytic approaches. Lay abstract Summaries of studies that have measured head size in those with autism, known as meta-analyses, currently exist. However, this approach does not adequately explain extreme cases (such as those with extremely small, or extremely large, head size). Because of this, we obtained all available published data measuring head size (12 studies). The data from each study were then combined to make a larger dataset. We found that females with autism aged 12–17 months had, on average, smaller head sizes. Otherwise, average head size was not atypical in autism. However, we found that males with autism were more likely to have extreme head sizes at birth and between 60 and 100 months, a small head between 6 and 11 months, and a large head between 12 and 17 months. Females with autism were more likely to have extreme head sizes between 36 and 59 months and were less likely at birth. Our approach was able to measure the influence of age and biological sex on head size in autism, as well as the frequency of extreme cases of head size in autism. These results add to what we already know about head size in autism.


2010 ◽  
Vol 86 (8) ◽  
pp. 515-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Leviton ◽  
Karl Kuban ◽  
Elizabeth N. Allred ◽  
Jonathan L. Hecht ◽  
Andrew Onderdonk ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-317
Author(s):  
L. J. Salomon ◽  
B. Deloison ◽  
J. Lieuteret ◽  
M. Essaoui ◽  
B. Nasr ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 159 (3) ◽  
pp. 466-471.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreea Nissenkorn ◽  
Yonit Banet Levi ◽  
Daphna Vilozni ◽  
Yakov Berkun ◽  
Ori Efrati ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (S1) ◽  
pp. 169-169
Author(s):  
A. Della Gatta ◽  
M. Cofano ◽  
S. Amodeo ◽  
F. Filipponi ◽  
G. Pilu ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 210 (1) ◽  
pp. 154-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. G. Eriksson ◽  
E. Kajantie ◽  
M. Lampl ◽  
C. Osmond ◽  
D. J. P. Barker

2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Deloison ◽  
Gihad E. Chalouhi ◽  
Jean-Pierre Bernard ◽  
Yves Ville ◽  
Laurent J. Salomon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document