scholarly journals A novel oral prodrug-targeting transporter MCT 1: 5-fluorouracil-dicarboxylate monoester conjugates

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 631-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yixin Sun ◽  
Dongyang Zhao ◽  
Gang Wang ◽  
Qikun Jiang ◽  
Mengran Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 213 ◽  
pp. e102
Author(s):  
Tao Sun ◽  
Andrea Morger ◽  
Bastien Castagner ◽  
Jean-Christophe Leroux

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 2020-2030 ◽  
Author(s):  
G G Chabot ◽  
J P Armand ◽  
C Terret ◽  
M de Forni ◽  
D Abigerges ◽  
...  

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine the bioavailability (F) of etoposide (E;VP-16) after oral administration of the water-soluble prodrug etoposide phosphate (EP;BMY-40481) during a phase I trial in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-nine patients received oral EP (capsules, 50 to 150 mg/m2/d of E equivalent) for 5 days in week 1 (course 1), followed every 3 weeks thereafter by a daily intravenous (i.v.) infusion for 5 days of E (80 mg/m2, 1-hour i.v. infusion; course 2); in three patients, the i.v. E course was given before oral EP. Plasma and urine E pharmacokinetics (high-performance liquid chromatography [HPLC]) were performed on the first day of oral EP administration and on the first day of i.v. E. RESULTS Twenty-six of 29 patients completed two courses or more, whereas three patients received only one course due to toxicity. Myelosuppression was dose-dependent and dose-limiting, with grade 4 leukoneutropenia in four of 15 patients at 125 mg/m2 and in five of seven patients at 150 mg/m2. One patient died of meningeal hemorrhage related to grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities were infrequent and/or manageable. No objective response was observed. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) is therefore 150 mg/m2, and the recommended oral dose of EP for phase II trials in this poor-risk patient population is 125 mg/m2. Twenty-six patients had pharmacokinetic data for both oral EP and i.v. E, whereas three had pharmacokinetic data on the i.v. E course only. After oral administration of EP, the pharmacokinetics of E were as follows: mean absorption rate constant (Ka), 1.7 +/- 1.7 h-1 (mean +/- SD); lag time, 0.3 +/- 0.2 hours; time of maximum concentration (t(max)), 1.6 +/- 0.8 hours; and mean half-lives (t1/2), 1.6 +/- 0.2 (first) and 10.3 +/- 5.8 hours (terminal); the increase in the area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) of E was proportional to the EP dose. After the 1-hour i.v. infusion of E, maximum concentration (C(max)) was 15 +/- 3 micrograms/mL; mean AUC, 88.0 +/- 22.0 micrograms.h/mL; mean total-body clearance (CL), 0.97 +/- 0.24 L/h/m2 (16.2 mL/min/m2); and mean t1/2, 0.9 +/- 0.6 (first) and 8.1 +/- 4.1 hours (terminal). The 24-hour urinary excretion of E after i.v. E was significantly higher (33%) compared with that of oral EP (17%) (P < .001). Significant correlation was observed between the neutropenia at nadir and the AUC of E after oral EP administration (r = .58, P < .01, sigmoid maximum effect [E(max)] model). The mean F of E after oral administration of EP in 26 patients was 68.0 +/- 17.9% (coefficient of variation [CV], 26.3%; F range, 35.5% to 111.8%). In this study, tumor type, as well as EP dose, did not significantly influence the F in E. There was no difference in F of E, whether oral EP was administered before or after i.v. E. Compared with literature data on oral E, the percent F in E after oral prodrug EP administration was 19% higher at either low ( < or = 100 mg/m2) or high ( > 100 mg/m2) doses. CONCLUSION Similarly to E, the main toxicity of the prodrug EP is dose-dependent leukoneutropenia, which is dose-limiting at the oral MTD of 150 mg/m2/d for 5 days. The recommended oral dose of EP is 125 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 3 weeks in poor-risk patients. Compared with literature data, oral EP has a 19% higher F value compared with oral E either at low or high doses. This higher F in E from oral prodrug EP appears to be a pharmacologic advantage that could be of potential pharmacodynamic importance for this drug.


Author(s):  
Wontak Kim ◽  
Hillary Haws ◽  
Peter Peterson ◽  
Clifford J. Whatcott ◽  
Steven Weitman ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-300
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Pradelli ◽  
Mario Eandi

Despite the fact that an effective vaccine against hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been available for over 30 years, the worldwide prevalence of this infection is still very high. Until recently, there were only two effective therapeutic options for chronic hepatitis B (CHB), interferon and lamivudine, but both are considered suboptimal therapies, for different reasons. Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) is the oral prodrug of adefovir, an acyclic nucleotide analogue that demonstrated virological and clinical effectiveness against HBV in experimental and real world settings. In this paper the main pharmacological and clinical evidence of ADV in CHB is reviewed. Health care economics data on the direct costs of CHB in different countries are presented and potential economical consequences of its introduction in Italy are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document