Abstract
Aims
Risk stratification in Brugada syndrome (BrS) still represents an unsettled issue. In this multicentre study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and the long-term clinical course of patients with BrS.
Methods and results
A total of 111 consecutive patients (86 males; aged 45.3 ± 13.3 years) diagnosed with BrS were included and followed-up in a prospective fashion. Thirty-seven patients (33.3%) were symptomatic at enrolment (arrhythmic syncope). An electrophysiological study (EPS) was performed in 59 patients (53.2%), and ventricular arrhythmias were induced in 32 (54.2%). A cardioverter defibrillator was implanted in 34 cases (30.6%). During a mean follow-up period of 4.6 ± 3.5 years, appropriate device therapies occurred in seven patients. Event-free survival analysis (log-rank test) showed that spontaneous type-1 electrocardiogram pattern (P = 0.008), symptoms at presentation (syncope) (P = 0.012), family history of sudden cardiac death (P < 0.001), positive EPS (P = 0.024), fragmented QRS (P = 0.004), and QRS duration in lead V2 > 113 ms (P < 0.001) are predictors of future arrhythmic events. Event rates were 0%, 4%, and 60% among patients with 0–1 risk factor, 2–3 risk factors, and 4–5 risk factors, respectively (P < 0.001). Current multiparametric score models exhibit an excellent negative predictive value and perform well in risk stratification of BrS patients.
Conclusions
Multiparametric models including common risk factors appear to provide better risk stratification of BrS patients than single factors alone.
Letter Regarding Article by Bokhari et al, “Long-Term Comparison of the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Versus Amiodarone: Eleven-Year Follow-Up of a Subset of Patients in the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS)”