scholarly journals Maximizing fuel production rates in isothermal solar thermochemical fuel production

2016 ◽  
Vol 183 ◽  
pp. 1098-1111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy C. Davenport ◽  
Chih-Kai Yang ◽  
Christopher J. Kucharczyk ◽  
Michael J. Ignatowich ◽  
Sossina M. Haile
Solar Energy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 204-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.D. Takalkar ◽  
R.R. Bhosale ◽  
A. Kumar ◽  
F. AlMomani ◽  
M. Khraisheh ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Leonard ◽  
Nichole Reyes ◽  
Kyle M. Allen ◽  
Kelvin Randhir ◽  
Like Li ◽  
...  

Mixed metal ferrites have shown much promise in two-step solar-thermochemical fuel production. Previous work has typically focused on evaluating a particular metal ferrite produced by a particular synthesis process, which makes comparisons between studies performed by independent researchers difficult. A comparative study was undertaken to explore the effects different synthesis methods have on the performance of a particular material during redox cycling using thermogravimetry. This study revealed that materials made via wet chemistry methods and extended periods of high temperature calcination yield better redox performance. Differences in redox performance between materials made via wet chemistry methods were minimal and these demonstrated much better performance than those synthesized via the solid state method. Subsequently, various metal ferrite samples (NiFe2O4, MgFe2O4, CoFe2O4, and MnFe2O4) in yttria stabilized zirconia (8YSZ) were synthesized via coprecipitation and tested to determine the most promising metal ferrite combination. It was determined that 10 wt.% CoFe2O4in 8YSZ produced the highest and most consistent yields of O2and CO. By testing the effects of synthesis methods and dopants in a consistent fashion, those aspects of ferrite preparation which are most significant can be revealed. More importantly, these insights can guide future efforts in developing the next generation of thermochemical fuel production materials.


Energy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 201 ◽  
pp. 117649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Haeussler ◽  
Stéphane Abanades ◽  
Anne Julbe ◽  
Julien Jouannaux ◽  
Bruno Cartoixa

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (29) ◽  
pp. 32622-32632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander H. Bork ◽  
Alfonso J. Carrillo ◽  
Zachary D. Hood ◽  
Bilge Yildiz ◽  
Jennifer L. M. Rupp

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (24) ◽  
pp. 9614-9624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Gao ◽  
Alejandro Vidal ◽  
Alicia Bayon ◽  
Roman Bader ◽  
Jim Hinkley ◽  
...  

The flame-made nanostructured agglomerates achieved ca. 200% higher syngas production rates and the highest redox capacity so far reported for ceria.


2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 470-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Falter ◽  
Valentin Batteiger ◽  
Andreas Sizmann

Author(s):  
Luke J. Venstrom ◽  
Nicholas Petkovich ◽  
Stephen Rudisill ◽  
Andreas Stein ◽  
Jane H. Davidson

The H2 and CO productivity and reactivity of three-dimensionally ordered macroporous (3DOM) cerium and cerium-zirconium oxide upon H2O and CO2 oxidation at 1073K is presented in comparison to the productivity and reactivity of non-ordered porous and low porosity cerium oxide. The production of H2 and CO2 constitutes the second step of the two-step solar thermochemical H2O and CO2 splitting cycles. The 3DOM cerium oxide, with a specific surface area of 25 m2 g−1, increases the average H2 and CO production rates over the non-ordered porous cerium oxide with a specific surface area of 112 m2 g−1: the average H2 production rate increases from 5.2 cm3 g−1 min−1 to 7.9 cm3 g−1 min−1 and the average CO production rate increases from 7.7 cm3 g−1 min−1 to 21.9 cm3 g−1 min−1. The superior reactivity of 3DOM cerium oxide is attributed primarily to the stability of the 3DOM structure and also to the improved transport of reacting species to and from oxidation sites realized with the interconnected and ordered pores of the 3DOM structure. Doping the 3DOM cerium oxide with 20 mol% zirconia further stabilizes the structure and increases the average H2 and CO production rates to 10.2 cm3 g−1 min−1 and 22.1 cm3 g−1 min−1, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document