Evaluating biogeochemical indicators of methanogenic conditions and thermodynamic constraints in peat

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 104471
Author(s):  
Simona Bonaiuti ◽  
Christian Blodau ◽  
Klaus-Holger Knorr
1997 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. R. Reddy ◽  
E. M. D'Angelo

Wetlands support several aerobic and anaerobic biogeochemical processes that regulate removal/retention of pollutants, which has encouraged the intentional use of wetlands for pollutant abatement. The purpose of this paper is to present a brief review of key processes regulating pollutant removal and identify potential indicators that can be measured to evaluate treatment efficiency. Carbon and toxic organic compound removal efficiency can be determined by measuring soil or water oxygen demand, microbial biomass, soil Eh and pH. Similarly, nitrate removal can be predicted by dissolved organic C and microbial biomass. Phosphorus retention can be described by the availability of reactive Fe and Al in acid soils and Ca and Mg in alkaline soils. Relationships between soil processes and indicators are useful tools to transfer mechanistic information between diverse types of wetland treatment systems.


2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 6351-6435
Author(s):  
C. Volta ◽  
G. G. Laruelle ◽  
S. Arndt ◽  
P. Regnier

Abstract. This study applies the Carbon-Generic Estuary Model (C-GEM) modeling platform to simulate the estuarine biogeochemical dynamics – in particular the air-water CO2 exchange – in three idealized end-member systems covering the main features of tidal alluvial estuaries. C-GEM uses a generic biogeochemical reaction network and a unique set of model parameters extracted from a comprehensive literature survey to perform steady-state simulations representing average conditions for temperate estuaries worldwide. Climate and boundary conditions are extracted from published global databases (e.g. World Ocean Atlas, GLORICH) and catchment model outputs (GlobalNEWS2). The whole-system biogeochemical indicators Net Ecosystem Metabolism (NEM), C and N filtering capacities (FCTC and FCTN, respectively) and CO2 gas exchanges (FCO2) are calculated across the three end-member systems and are related to their main hydrodynamic and transport characteristics. A sensitivity analysis, which propagates the parameter uncertainties, is also carried out, followed by projections of changes in the biogeochemical indicators for the year 2050. Results show that the average C filtering capacities for baseline conditions are 40, 30 and 22% for the marine, mixed and riverine estuary, respectively. This translates into a first-order, global CO2 outgassing flux for tidal estuaries between 0.04 and 0.07 Pg C yr−1. N filtering capacities, calculated in similar fashion, range from 22% for the marine estuary to 18 and 15% for the mixed and the riverine estuary, respectively. Sensitivity analysis performed by varying the rate constants for aerobic degradation, denitrification and nitrification over the range of values reported in the literature significantly widens these ranges for both C and N. Simulations for the year 2050 indicate that all end-member estuaries will remain net heterotrophic and while the riverine and mixed systems will only marginally be affected by river load changes and increase in atmospheric pCO2, the marine estuary is likely to become a significant CO2 sink in its downstream section. In the decades to come, such change of behavior might strengthen the overall CO2 sink of the estuary-coastal ocean continuum.


Author(s):  
Salvador Sánchez-Carrillo ◽  
K. Ramesh Reddy ◽  
Kanika S. Inglett ◽  
Miguel Álvarez-Cobelas ◽  
Raquel Sánchez-Andrés

1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ph. Martinez ◽  
Ph. Bertrand ◽  
I. Bouloubassi ◽  
G. Bareille ◽  
G. Shimmield ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 567-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer C. Villinski ◽  
John M. Hayes ◽  
Simon C. Brassell ◽  
Virginia L. Riggert ◽  
Robert B. Dunbar

2011 ◽  
Vol 299 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 426-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.C. Cordeiro ◽  
B. Turcq ◽  
A. Sifeddine ◽  
L.D. Lacerda ◽  
E.V. Silva Filho ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document