Additional Saturday Allied Health Services Increase Habitual Physical Activity Among Patients Receiving Inpatient Rehabilitation for Lower Limb Orthopedic Conditions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective: Individuals post stroke are inactive, even during rehabilitation, contributing to ongoing disability and risk of secondary health conditions. Our aims were to (1) conduct a randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of a “Patient-Directed Activity Program” on functional outcomes in people post stroke during inpatient rehabilitation and (2) examine differences three months post inpatient rehabilitation discharge. Design: Randomized control trial. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation facility. Subjects: Patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation post stroke. Interventions: Patient-Directed Activity Program (PDAP) or control (usual care only). Both groups underwent control (three hours of therapy/day), while PDAP participants were prescribed two additional 30-minute activity sessions/day. Main measures: Outcomes (Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement Measure, Functional Independence Measure, balance, physical activity, Stroke Impact Scale) were collected at admission and discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and three-month follow-up. Results: Seventy-three patients (PDAP ( n = 37); control ( n = 36)) were included in the primary analysis. Patients in PDAP completed a total of 23.1 ± 16.5 sessions (10.7 ± 8.5 upper extremity; 12.4 ± 8.6 lower extremity) during inpatient rehabilitation. No differences were observed between groups at discharge in functional measures. PDAP completed significantly more steps/day (PDAP = 657.70 ± 655.82, control = 396.17 ± 419.65; P = 0.022). The Stroke Impact Scale showed significantly better memory and thinking (PDAP = 86.2 ± 11.4, control = 80.8 ± 16.7; P = 0.049), communication (PDAP = 93.6 ± 8.3, control = 89.6 ± 12.4; P = 0.042), mobility (PDAP = 62.2 ± 22.5, control = 53.8 ± 21.8; P = 0.038), and overall recovery from stroke (PDAP = 62.1 ± 19.1, control = 52.2 ± 18.7; P = 0.038) for PDAP compared to control. At three months post discharge, PDAP ( n = 11) completed significantly greater physical activity ( P = 0.014; 3586.5 ± 3468.5 steps/day) compared to control ( n = 10; 1760.9 ± 2346.3 steps/day). Conclusion: Functional outcome improvement was comparable between groups; however, PDAP participants completed more steps and perceived greater recovery.

Download Full-text

Exercise to Reduce Mobility Disability and Prevent Falls After Fall-Related Leg or Pelvic Fracture: RESTORE Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal of General Internal Medicine ◽

10.1007/s11606-020-05666-9 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 35 (10) ◽

pp. 2907-2916 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Catherine Sherrington ◽

Nicola Fairhall ◽

Catherine Kirkham ◽

Lindy Clemson ◽

Anne Tiedemann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Physical Activity ◽

Randomized Controlled Trial ◽

Pelvic Fracture ◽

Lower Limb ◽

Fall Risk ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Weight Bearing ◽

Group Differences ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background Disability and falls are common following fall-related lower limb and pelvic fractures. Objective To evaluate the impact of an exercise self-management intervention on mobility-related disability and falls after lower limb or pelvic fracture. Design Randomized controlled trial. Participants Three hundred thirty-six community dwellers aged 60+ years within 2 years of lower limb or pelvic fracture recruited from hospitals and community advertising. Interventions RESTORE (Recovery Exercises and STepping On afteR fracturE) intervention (individualized, physiotherapist-prescribed home program of weight-bearing balance and strength exercises, fall prevention advice) versus usual care. Main Measures Primary outcomes were mobility-related disability and rate of falls. Key Results Primary outcomes were available for 80% of randomized participants. There were no significant between-group differences in mobility-related disability at 12 months measured by (a) Short Physical Performance Battery (continuous version, baseline-adjusted between-group difference 0.08, 95% CI − 0.01 to 0.17, p = 0.08, n = 273); (b) Activity Measure Post Acute Care score (0.18, 95% CI − 2.89 to 3.26, p = 0.91, n = 270); (c) Late Life Disability Instrument (1.37, 95% CI − 2.56 to 5.32, p = 0.49, n = 273); or in rate of falls over the 12-month study period (incidence rate ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.34, n = 336, p = 0.83). Between-group differences favoring the intervention group were evident in some secondary outcomes: balance and mobility, fall risk (Physiological Profile Assessment tool), physical activity, mood, health and community outings, but these should be interpreted with caution due to risk of chance findings from multiple analyses. Conclusions No statistically significant intervention impacts on mobility-related disability and falls were detected, but benefits were seen for secondary measures of balance and mobility, fall risk, physical activity, mood, health, and community outings. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12610000805077

Download Full-text