Accurate Prediction of Persistent Upper Extremity Impairment in Patients with Ischemic Stroke

Author(s):  
Adam de Havenon ◽  
Laura Heitsch ◽  
Abimbola Sunmonu ◽  
Robynne Braun ◽  
Keith R. Lohse ◽  
...  
Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam H de Havenon ◽  
Robynne Braun ◽  
N Abimbola Sunmonu ◽  
Laura Heitsch ◽  
Eva Mistry ◽  
...  

Background: Motor impairment after ischemic stroke is common and has variable recovery that depends on patient factors and stroke severity. An important challenge in rehabilitation research is enrolling patients who may benefit from interventions to improve recovery because they will not recover with standard care. Hypothesis: We can accurately predict persistent upper extremity motor impairment at 90 days after acute ischemic stroke. Methods: The primary outcome was an NIHSS arm domain score of 2-4 at 90 days in patients with a 24-hour NIHSS arm score of 1-4, which we termed persistent arm impairment. With the NINDS tPA trial dataset we used LASSO regression to select baseline demographics and 24-hour NIHSS score domains for a predictive model. We gave one point each for age ≥60 years and 24-hour NIHSS values of worst arm=4, worst leg>2, facial palsy=3, and total NIHSS≥10. The optimal cutpoint for a positive Persistent UPPer extremity Impairment (PUPPI) Score was ≥3 points. We validated the PUPPI score in the ALIAS Part 2, IMS-III, and DEFUSE 3 trials. Results: We included 431, 383, 331, and 71 patients from the NINDS tPA, ALIAS Part 2, IMS-III, and DEFUSE 3 trials. PUPPI was most common in the NINDS tPA trial (62%) and least common in ALIAS (31.3%). The PUPPI Score accurately predicted PUPPI with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of >0.75 for all trials (Table 1). The positive predictive value was 74.6%, 90.9%, 86.1%, and 74.5% in the NINDS tPA, ALIAS Part 2, IMS-III, and DEFUSE 3 trials (Table 1). Conclusion: The PUPPI score uses readily available information to provide accurate prediction of patients who will have persistent upper extremity motor impairment at 90 days from stroke onset.


2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-4, 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham

Abstract To account for the effects of multiple impairments, evaluating physicians must provide a summary value that combines multiple impairments so the whole person impairment is equal to or less than the sum of all the individual impairment values. A common error is to add values that should be combined and typically results in an inflated rating. The Combined Values Chart in the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, Fifth Edition, includes instructions that guide physicians about combining impairment ratings. For example, impairment values within a region generally are combined and converted to a whole person permanent impairment before combination with the results from other regions (exceptions include certain impairments of the spine and extremities). When they combine three or more values, physicians should select and combine the two lowest values; this value is combined with the third value to yield the total value. Upper extremity impairment ratings are combined based on the principle that a second and each succeeding impairment applies not to the whole unit (eg, whole finger) but only to the part that remains (eg, proximal phalanx). Physicians who combine lower extremity impairments usually use only one evaluation method, but, if more than one method is used, the physician should use the Combined Values Chart.


2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 4-12
Author(s):  
Lorne Direnfeld ◽  
James Talmage ◽  
Christopher Brigham

Abstract This article was prompted by the submission of two challenging cases that exemplify the decision processes involved in using the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides). In both cases, the physical examinations were normal with no evidence of illness behavior, but, based on their histories and clinical presentations, the patients reported credible symptoms attributable to specific significant injuries. The dilemma for evaluators was whether to adhere to the AMA Guides, as written, or to attempt to rate impairment in these rare cases. In the first case, the evaluating neurologist used alternative approaches to define impairment based on the presence of thoracic outlet syndrome and upper extremity pain, as if there were a nerve injury. An orthopedic surgeon who evaluated the case did not base impairment on pain and used the upper extremity chapters in the AMA Guides. The impairment ratings determined using either the nervous system or upper extremity chapters of the AMA Guides resulted in almost the same rating (9% vs 8% upper extremity impairment), and either value converted to 5% whole person permanent impairment. In the second case, the neurologist evaluated the individual for neuropathic pain (9% WPI), and the orthopedic surgeon rated the patient as Diagnosis-related estimates Cervical Category II for nonverifiable radicular pain (5% to 8% WPI).


1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Richard T. Katz ◽  
Sankar Perraraju

Abstract The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Fourth Edition, offers several categories to describe impairment in the shoulder, including shoulder amputation, abnormal shoulder motion, peripheral nerve disorders, subluxation/dislocation, and joint arthroplasty. This article clarifies appropriate methods for rating shoulder impairment in a specific patient, particularly with reference to the AMA Guides, Section 3.1j, Shoulder, Section 3.1k, Impairment of the Upper Extremity Due to Peripheral Nerve Disorders, and Section 3.1m, Impairment Due to Other Disorders of the Upper Extremity. A table shows shoulder motions and associated degrees of motion and can be used in assessing abnormal range of motion. Assessments of shoulder impairment due to peripheral nerve lesion also requires assessment of sensory loss (or presence of nerve pain) or motor deficits, and these may be categorized to the level of the spinal nerves (C5 to T1). Table 23 is useful regarding impairment from persistent joint subluxation or dislocation, and Table 27 can be helpful in assessing impairment of the upper extremity after arthroplasty of specific bones of joints. Although inter-rater reliability has been reasonably good, the validity of the upper extremity impairment rating has been questioned, and further research in industrial medicine and physical disability is required.


2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 383-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Na Jin Seo ◽  
Leah R. Enders ◽  
Binal Motawar ◽  
Marcella L. Kosmopoulos ◽  
Mojtaba Fathi-Firoozabad

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gourav Choudhury ◽  
Marcel Daadi

Ischemic stroke is the leading cause of upper extremity motor impairments. Well-characterized experimental stroke models for upper extremity motor impairment remain underdeveloped. Cortical representation of dexterous movements in nonhuman primates (NHP) is functionally and topographically similar to that in humans. We recently reported the characterization of an NHP model of focal ischemia reperfusion with a defined syndrome, impaired arm function and finger dexterity. In this study, we investigated the cellular changes in the neural stem cell compartment and glial cell populations in this NHP model. NHPs were subjected to transient cerebral ischemia by temporarily occluding the M3 segment of the left side middle cerebral artery (MCA). Motor and cognitive functions following the stroke were evaluated using the object retrieval task with barrier-detour. Postmortem analysis included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and immunohistopathology to map the infarct and characterize the neurogenic and gliogenic changes. The MCA occlusion produced significant loss of fine motor function characterized by impaired dexterity. Immunocytochemical analysis revealed significant increase of Sox2+ neural stem cells in the subventricular zone, and of GFAP+ astrocytes (P<0.0001) and Iba-1+ microglia (P<0.0001) in the infarct region. In addition, there was a 42% increase in doublecortin positive cells (P<0.0001) compared to non-ischemic hemisphere. This study describes the cellular composition of the endogenous changes in the neural stem cell compartment and in the stroke region. These data may help reveal the cellular identity mediating neural plasticity and the cellular mechanisms mediating behavioral deficits and post-stroke recovery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document