Use of the Kalina cycle as a bottoming cycle in a geothermal power plant: Case study of the Wayang Windu geothermal power plant

2018 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 686-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukman Adi Prananto ◽  
Ilman Nuran Zaini ◽  
Bobby Irawan Mahendranata ◽  
Firman Bagja Juangsa ◽  
Muhammad Aziz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Kalina Cycle ◽  
Geothermal Power Plant ◽  
Geothermal Power

Analysis of the Thermodynamic Performance of Kalina Cycle System 11 (KCS11) for Geothermal Power Plant: Comparison With Kawerau ORMAT Binary Plant

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinli Lu ◽  
Arnold Watson ◽  
Joe Deans
Keyword(s):  
Power Generation ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Heat Source ◽  
Gas Turbines ◽  
Effective Means ◽  
Specific Power ◽  
Kalina Cycle ◽  
Geothermal Power Plant ◽  
Thermodynamic Performance ◽  
Geothermal Power

Since the first geothermal power plant was built at Larderello (Italy) in 1904, many attempts have been made to improve conversion efficiency. Among innovative technologies, using the Kalina cycle is considered as one of the most effective means of enhancing the thermodynamic performance for both high and low temperature heat source systems. Although initially used as the bottoming cycle of gas turbines and diesel engines, in the late 1980s the Kalina cycle was found to be attractive for geothermal power generation [1, 2, 3]. Different versions (KSC11, KSC12 and KSC13) were designated. Comparison between Kalina cycle and other power cycles can be found in later studies [4, 5, 6]. Here we examine KSC11, because it is specifically designed for geothermal power generation, with lower capital cost [3]. We compare this design with the existing Kawerau ORMAT binary plant in New Zealand. In addition, parametric sensitivity analysis of KCS11 has been carried out for the specific power output and net thermal efficiency by changing the temperatures of both heat source and heat sink for a given ammonia-water composition.

Dry steam cycle application for excess steam utilization: Kamojang geothermal power plant case study

2018 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. 157-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukman Adi Prananto ◽  
Firman Bagja Juangsa ◽  
Riza Mochamad Iqbal ◽  
Muhammad Aziz ◽  
Tubagus Ahmad Fauzi Soelaiman
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Geothermal Power Plant ◽  
Geothermal Power ◽  
Steam Cycle

scholarly journals Preliminary analysis of dry-steam geothermal power plant by employing exergy assessment: Case study in Kamojang geothermal power plant, Indonesia

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 292-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bayu Rudiyanto ◽  
IbnuAtho Illah ◽  
Nugroho Agung Pambudi ◽  
Chin-Chi Cheng ◽  
Reza Adiprana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Preliminary Analysis ◽  
Geothermal Power Plant ◽  
Geothermal Power

Case Study of the Puna Geothermal Power Plant and Proposed Retrofit H2S Gas Mitigation Strategies

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin R. Anderson ◽  
Wael Yassine
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Mitigation Strategies ◽  
Geothermal Power Plant ◽  
Current State ◽  
Abatement Strategies ◽  
Simulation Results ◽  
Geothermal Power

Abstract This paper presents modeling of the Puna Geothermal Venture as a case study in understanding how the technology of geothermal can by successfully implemented. The paper presents a review of the Puna Geothermal Venture specifications, followed by simulation results carried out using NREL SAM and RETSCREEN analysis tools in order to quantify the pertinent metrics associated with the geothermal powerplant by retrofitting its current capacity of 30 MW to 60 MW. The paper closes with a review of current state-of-the art H2S abatement strategies for geothermal power plants, and presents an outline of how these technologies can be implemented at the Puna Geothermal Venture.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document