Histomorphometric analysis of the sinus lateral wall and Schneiderian membrane: A cadaveric study

Category: Hindfoot; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: The lateral extensile approach (LEA) to the calcaneus has long been a popular surgical approach to treat calcaneal fractures. However, high rates of wound complications have led surgeons to investigate alternative approaches. As a result, the sinus tarsi approach has grown in popularity. The lateral extensile approach affords substantial visualization of the calcaneus. However, this visualization has never been compared in a quantitative manner to the sinus tarsi approach (STA). The objective of this cadaveric study is to compare calcaneal visualization afforded by a sinus tarsi approach and a lateral extensile approach. Methods: Seven pair-matched, fresh-frozen, below-knee cadaver specimens were obtained. For each pair, one side received an LEA and the other side received a STA. To identify areas of the calcaneus accessible by instrument, a curette was used to mark the visualized calcaneal surfaces. The calcaneus was then disarticulated and cleared of all soft tissue. The curette markings were then identified and marked with blue surgical marker. Photos were taken of each calcaneus, and visualized surface areas were calculated using Image J software. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the articular surfaces accessible between the two approaches (831.99 mm2 for LEA vs. 903.41 mm2 for STA, p=0.53) including the anterior, middle, and posterior facets. The total calcaneal surface area accessible was 3107.08 mm2 for LEA and 1444.19 mm2 for STA (p=0.02). The LEA allowed better exposure to the lateral wall (p<0.01) and superior greater tuberosity of the calcaneus (p=0.05). Conclusion: In comparison to the LEA, the STA allows for equivalent exposure to articular surfaces. While the LEA allows for greater exposure of the lateral wall and posterior tuberosity, direct visualization of these structures may not warrant the higher risk of wound complications. Surgeons should be mindful of these differences when choosing a surgical approach in the treatment of calcaneal fractures.

Download Full-text

Use of a guide device to place pedicle screws in the thoracic spine: a cadaveric study

Journal of Neurosurgery Spine ◽

10.3171/spi.2001.94.2.0328 ◽

2001 ◽

Vol 94 (2) ◽

pp. 328-333 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jee Soo Jang ◽

Won Bok Lee ◽

Hansen A. Yuan

Keyword(s):

Thoracic Spine ◽

Pedicle Screws ◽

Lateral Wall ◽

Cadaveric Study ◽

Medial Wall ◽

Screw Placement ◽

Content Type ◽

Thoracic Pedicle Screws ◽

Guide Device ◽

Fine Print

✓ In this cadaveric study, the safety and accuracy of a specially designed guide device for the placement of thoracic pedicle screws was investigated in a normal anatomical situation. Five embalmed human cadaveric thoracic spines (T1–12) were used for the study of transpedicular screw placement in the thoracic spine. Overall 120 screws were placed at all thoracic levels. The screws were inserted bilaterally in the thoracic pedicles by using a specially designed guide device. No radiographs or other imaging studies were obtained. Following screw placement, computerized tomography scans were performed to evaluate the accuracy of the pedicle screw positioning. Seven (5.8%) of the screws penetrated the pedicle wall or the vertebral body (VB) cortex. Two screws (1.7%) penetrated the medial wall of the pedicle. Two screws (1.7%) penetrated the lateral wall of the pedicle, and one screw (0.8%) penetrated the lateral wall of the pedicle and the anterior VB cortex simultaneously. Two screws (1.7%) penetrated the anterior VB cortex. Compared with the results of other studies, the findings here indicate that using this device to guide the placement of thoracic pedicle screws can significantly reduce the incidence of pedicle penetration, particularly in the medial wall.

Download Full-text