Use of a guide device to place pedicle screws in the thoracic spine: a cadaveric study

2001 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 328-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jee Soo Jang ◽  
Won Bok Lee ◽  
Hansen A. Yuan
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Spine ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Lateral Wall ◽  
Cadaveric Study ◽  
Medial Wall ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Thoracic Pedicle Screws ◽  
Guide Device ◽  
Fine Print

✓ In this cadaveric study, the safety and accuracy of a specially designed guide device for the placement of thoracic pedicle screws was investigated in a normal anatomical situation. Five embalmed human cadaveric thoracic spines (T1–12) were used for the study of transpedicular screw placement in the thoracic spine. Overall 120 screws were placed at all thoracic levels. The screws were inserted bilaterally in the thoracic pedicles by using a specially designed guide device. No radiographs or other imaging studies were obtained. Following screw placement, computerized tomography scans were performed to evaluate the accuracy of the pedicle screw positioning. Seven (5.8%) of the screws penetrated the pedicle wall or the vertebral body (VB) cortex. Two screws (1.7%) penetrated the medial wall of the pedicle. Two screws (1.7%) penetrated the lateral wall of the pedicle, and one screw (0.8%) penetrated the lateral wall of the pedicle and the anterior VB cortex simultaneously. Two screws (1.7%) penetrated the anterior VB cortex. Compared with the results of other studies, the findings here indicate that using this device to guide the placement of thoracic pedicle screws can significantly reduce the incidence of pedicle penetration, particularly in the medial wall.

Thoracic pedicle screws: postoperative computerized tomography scanning assessment

2004 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Heary ◽  
Christopher M. Bono ◽  
Margaret Black
Keyword(s):  
Computerized Tomography ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Ct Scanning ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Grading System ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Thoracic Pedicle Screws ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Grade Iii ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors evaluated the accuracy of placement of thoracic pedicle screws by performing postoperative computerized tomography (CT) scanning. A grading system is presented by which screw placement is classified in relation to neurological, bone, and intrathoracic landmarks. Methods. One hundred eighty-five thoracic pedicle screws were implanted in 27 patients with the assistance of computer image guidance or fluoroscopy. Postoperative CT scanning was conducted to determine a grade for each screw: Grade I, entirely contained within pedicle; Grade II, violates lateral pedicle but screw tip entirely contained within the vertebral body (VB); Grade III, tip penetrates anterior or lateral VB; Grade IV, breaches medial or inferior pedicle; and Grade V, violates pedicle or VB and endangers spinal cord, nerve root, or great vessels and requires immediate revision. Based on anatomical morphometry, the spine was subdivided into upper (T1–2), middle (T3–6), and lower (T7–12) regions. Statistical analyses were performed to compare regions. The mean follow-up period was 37.6 months. The following postoperative CT scanning—documented grades were determined: Grade I, 160 screws (86.5%); Grade II, 15 (8.1%); Grade III, six (3.2%); Grade IV, three (1.6%); and Grade V, one (0.5%). Among cases involving screw misplacements, Grade II placement was most common, and this occurred most frequently in the middle thoracic region. Conclusions. The authors' grading system has advantages over those previously described; however, further study to determine its reliability, reproducibility, and predictive value of clinical sequelae is warranted. Postoperative CT scanning should be considered the gold standard for evaluating thoracic pedicle screw placement.

Three-dimensional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement

2003 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Langston T. Holly ◽  
Kevin T. Foley
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Spinal Navigation ◽  
Mean Diameter ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Fine Print

✓ The authors sought to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopic guidance for percutaneous placement of thoracic and lumbar pedicle screws in three cadaveric specimens. After attaching a percutaneous dynamic reference array to the surgical anatomy, an isocentric C-arm fluoroscope was used to obtain images of the region of interest. Light-emitting diodes attached to the C-arm unit were tracked using an electrooptical camera. The image data set was transferred to the image-guided workstation, which performed an automated registration. Using the workstation display, pedicle screw trajectories were planned. An image-guided drill guide was passed through a stab incision, and this was followed by sequential image-guided pedicle drilling, tapping, and screw placement. Pedicle screws of various diameters (range 4–6.5 mm) were placed in all pedicles greater than 4 mm in diameter. Postoperatively, thin-cut computerized tomography scans were obtained to determine the accuracy of screw placement. Eighty-nine (94.7%) of 94 percutaneous screws were placed completely within the cortical pedicle margins, including all 30 lumbar screws (100%) and 59 (92%) of 64 thoracic screws. The mean diameter of all thoracic pedicles was 6 mm (range 2.9–11 mm); the mean diameter of the five pedicles in which wall violations occurred was 4.6 mm (range 4.1–6.3 mm). Two of the violations were less than 2 mm beyond the cortex; the others were between 2 and 3 mm. Coupled with an image guidance system, 3D fluoroscopy allows highly accurate spinal navigation. Results of this study suggest that this technology will facilitate the application of minimally invasive techniques to the field of spine surgery.

Surgical anatomy of the C-2 pedicle

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay U. Howington ◽  
John J. Kruse ◽  
Deepak Awasthi
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Anatomical Study ◽  
Ct Scanning ◽  
Surgical Anatomy ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Preoperative Imaging ◽  
Direct Visualization ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The goal of this anatomical study was to investigate the surgical and radiographic anatomy of the C-2 pedicle in relation to transpedicular screw placement in occipitocervical stabilization and to establish anatomical guidelines for the placement of C-2 pedicle screws. Methods. The C-2 pedicles in 10 cadaveric spines were evaluated using both computerized tomography (CT) scanning and manual measurements. The specimens were scanned; the mediolateral and rostrocaudal angulations of each pedicle were measured, with the midline sagittal plane and the inferior endplate of the C-2 facet, respectively, as references, and values were recorded in 1° increments by using a digital goniometer. The height, width, and length of the pedicles were also measured on the CT scans. Based on these measurements in conjunction with direct visualization of the C-2 pedicle through the C1–2 interlaminar space pedicle screws were then placed. The distances from the screw entry point to the midline, C2–3 joint line, and the medial aspect of the vertebral artery were also measured. Repeated CT scanning was then performed to assess screw placement. The average pedicle height, width, and length measured 9.1 mm, 7.9 mm, and 16.6 mm, respectively, and the medial inclination and rostrocaudal angulation averaged 35.2° and 38.8°, respectively. The cortex of the pedicle was not violated in any of the 20 cadaveric specimens. Conclusions. Adequate preoperative imaging studies in conjunction with direct visualization of the C-2 pedicle make transpedicular fixation safe and effective.

scholarly journals Free-hand placement of high thoracic pedicle screws with the aid of fluoroscopy: evaluation of positioning by CT scans in a four-year consecutive series

2010 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 390-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Perocco Braga ◽  
Josaphat Vilela de Morais ◽  
Marcelo Duarte Vilela
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Spine ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Upper Thoracic Spine ◽  
Hardware Failure ◽  
Thoracic Pedicle Screws ◽  
Upper Thoracic ◽  
Technical Principles

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety and accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the upper thoracic spine using the free-hand technique with the aid of fluoroscopy; to analyze the methods used to verify correct screw positioning intra and postoperatively. METHOD: All patients with instability of the cervicothoracic or upper thoracic spine and at least one screw placed in the segment T1-T6 as part of a posterior construct entered the study. Only C-arm intraoperative fluoroscopy was used to guide screw placement. RESULTS: We obtained excellent positioning in 98.07% of the screws. CT scans precisely demonstrated pedicle wall and anterolateral body violations. There was no hardware failure, no neurological or vascular injury and no loss of alignment during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Pedicle screws can be safely placed in the upper thoracic spine when strict technical principles are followed. Only a CT scan can precisely demonstrate vertebral body and medial pedicle cortical violations.

Effects of pilot hole preparation technique on pedicle screw fixation in different regions of the osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar spine

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 364-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan J. Carmouche ◽  
Robert W. Molinari ◽  
Tad Gerlinger ◽  
John Devine ◽  
Troy Patience
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Thoracic Spine ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Preparation Technique ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Pilot Hole ◽  
Pullout Resistance ◽  
Insertional Torque ◽  
Upper Thoracic ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors evaluated the effects of pilot hole preparation technique on insertional torque and axial pullout resistance in osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. Methods. Using a probe technique and fluoroscopy, 102 pedicle screws were placed in 51 dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry—proven osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar levels. Screws were inserted using the same-size tapping, one-size-under tapping, or no-tapping technique. Insertional torque and axial pullout resistance were measured. Analysis of variance, Fisher exact test, and regression analysis were performed. Same-size tapping decreased pullout resistance in the lumbar spine. There was no effect on pullout resistance in the thoracic spine. Pullout resistance values were lower for all insertion techniques in the upper thoracic spine. Insertional torque and bone mineral density correlated with pullout resistance in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Conclusions. Tapping decreased pedicle screw pullout resistance in the osteoporotic human lumbar spine, although it did not affect pullout strength in the thoracic spine. Tapping decreased insertional torque in upper thoracic levels. Surgeons should optimize overall construct rigidity when placing thoracic pedicle screws in patients with spinal segment osteoporosis.

Stereotactic Navigation for Placement of Pedicle Screws in the Thoracic Spine

Neurosurgery ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 771-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew S. Youkilis ◽  
Douglas J. Quint ◽  
John E. McGillicuddy ◽  
Stephen M. Papadopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Thoracic Spine ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Spinal Instability ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Thoracic Pedicle Screw ◽  
Thoracic Pedicle Screws

Abstract OBJECTIVE Pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine has become the standard of care for various causes of spinal instability. However, because of the smaller size and more complex morphology of the thoracic pedicle, screw placement in the thoracic spine can be extremely challenging. In several published series, cortical violations have been reported in up to 50% of screws placed with standard fluoroscopic techniques. The goal of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement by use of image-guided techniques. METHODS During the past 4 years, 266 image-guided thoracic pedicle screws were placed in 65 patients at the University of Michigan Medical Center. Postoperative thin-cut computed tomographic scans were obtained in 52 of these patients who were available to enroll in the study. An impartial neuroradiologist evaluated 224 screws by use of a standardized grading scheme. All levels of the thoracic spine were included in the study. RESULTS Chart review revealed no incidence of neurological, cardiovascular, or pulmonary injury. Of the 224 screws reviewed, there were 19 cortical violations (8.5%). Eleven (4.9%) were Grade II (≤2 mm), and eight (3.6%) were Grade III (>2 mm) violations. Only five screws (2.2%), however, were thought to exhibit unintentional, structurally significant violations. Statistical analysis revealed a significantly higher rate of cortical perforation in the midthoracic spine (T4–T8, 16.7%; T1–T4, 8.8%; and T9–T12, 5.6%). CONCLUSION The low rate of cortical perforations (8.5%) and structurally significant violations (2.2%) in this retrospective series compares favorably with previously published results that used anatomic landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy. This study provides further evidence that stereotactic placement of pedicle screws can be performed safely and effectively at all levels of the thoracic spine.

Monostotic fibrous dysplasia of the thoracic spine: clinopathological description and follow up

2004 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 378-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Arazi ◽  
Onder Guney ◽  
Mustafa Ozdemir ◽  
Omer Uluoglu ◽  
Nuket Uzum
Keyword(s):  
Fibrous Dysplasia ◽  
Thoracic Spine ◽  
Histopathological Examination ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Spinal Tumors ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Thoracic Spinal ◽  
Fine Print

✓ The authors report the case of a 53-year-old woman with monostotic fibrous dysplasia of the thoracic spine. The patient presented with a 1-month history of pain in the thoracic spinal region. En bloc resection of the lesion was successfully performed via a transthoracic approach, and a histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of fibrous dysplasia. At 24-month follow-up examination, pain and vertebral instability were absent. The findings in this case illustrate that, although very rare, monostotic fibrous dysplasia of the thoracic spine should be considered in the differential diagnosis of spinal tumors. Although a consensus for management of this disease has not been achieved, the authors recommend radical removal of all involved bone as well as internal fixation or bone graft—assisted fusion to achieve long-term stabilization.

Osteoclastoma of the thoracic spine

1976 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 748-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed N. Gonem
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Spine ◽  
The Body ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Prevention Of Recurrence ◽  
Fine Print

✓ A case of osteoclastoma arising in the body of the T-9 vertebra is presented. Osteoclastoma rarely involves the vertebrae, and treatment, whether by surgery or radiotherapy, seldom results in eradication of the lesion or prevention of recurrence.

Delayed myelopathy secondary to retained intraspinal metallic fragment

1981 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 979-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Douglas Jones ◽  
Ronald E. Woosley
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Spine ◽  
Stab Wound ◽  
Good Recovery ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Stab Wounds ◽  
Fine Print

✓ The authors present a case of delayed myelopathy arising 8 years after a stab wound to the thoracic spine, with intradural retention of the knife tip. Following removal of the knife tip, the patient had a good recovery. A review of the literature documents eight additional cases of delayed myelopathy secondary to retained fragments from spinal stab wounds.

Effect of frameless stereotaxy on the accuracy of C1–2 transarticular screw placement

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orin Bloch ◽  
Langston T. Holly ◽  
Jongsoo Park ◽  
Chinyere Obasi ◽  
Kee Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Guidance ◽  
Vascular Anatomy ◽  
Ct Scanning ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Frameless Stereotaxy ◽  
Transarticular Screw ◽  
Anterior Cortex ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Pars Interarticularis ◽  
Fine Print

Object. In recent studies some authors have indicated that 20% of patients have at least one ectatic vertebral artery (VA) that, based on previous criteria in which preoperative computerized tomography (CT) and standard intraoperative fluoroscopic techniques were used, may prevent the safe placement of C1–2 transarticular screws. The authors conducted this study to determine whether frameless stereotaxy would improve the accuracy of C1–2 transarticular screw placement in healthy patients, particularly those whom previous criteria would have excluded. Methods. The authors assessed the accuracy of frameless stereotaxy for C1–2 transarticular screw placement in 17 cadaveric cervical spines. Preoperatively obtained CT scans of the C-2 vertebra were registered on a stereotactic workstation. The dimensions of the C-2 pars articularis were measured on the workstation, and a 3.5-mm screw was stereotactically placed if the height and width of the pars interarticularis was greater than 4 mm. The specimens were evaluated with postoperative CT scanning and visual inspection. Screw placement was considered acceptable if the screw was contained within the C-2 pars interarticularis, traversed the C1–2 joint, and the screw tip was shown to be within the anterior cortex of the C-1 lateral mass. Transarticular screws were accurately placed in 16 cadaveric specimens, and only one specimen (5.9%) was excluded because of anomalous VA anatomy. In contrast, a total of four specimens (23.5%) showed significant narrowing of the C-2 pars interarticularis due to vascular anatomy that would have precluded atlantoaxial transarticular screw placement had previous nonimage-guided criteria been used. Conclusions. Frameless stereotaxy provides precise image guidance that improves the safety of C1–2 transarticular screw placement and potentially allows this procedure to be performed in patients previously excluded because of the inaccuracy of nonimage-guided techniques.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document