Total Knee Arthroplasty for Profound Varus Deformity

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 550-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arun B. Mullaji ◽  
Vinod Padmanabhan ◽  
Gaurav Jindal
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals Postoperative laxity of the lateral soft tissue is largely negligible in total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949902110020
Author(s):  
Seikai Toyooka ◽  
Hironari Masuda ◽  
Nobuhiro Nishihara ◽  
Takashi Kobayashi ◽  
Wataru Miyamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Mechanical Axis ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Varus Knee ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Knee Deformity ◽  
Varus Stress ◽  
Total Knee

Purpose: To evaluate the integrity of lateral soft tissue in varus osteoarthritis knee by comparing the mechanical axis under varus stress during navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty before and after compensating for a bone defect with the implant. Methods: Sixty-six knees that underwent total knee arthroplasty were investigated. The mechanical axis of the operated knee was evaluated under manual varus stress immediately after knee exposure and after navigation-assisted implantation. The correlation between each value of the mechanical axis and degree of preoperative varus deformity was compared by regression analysis. Results: The maximum mechanical axis under varus stress immediately after knee exposure increased in proportion to the degree of preoperative varus deformity. Moreover, the maximum mechanical axis under varus stress after implantation increased in proportion to the degree of preoperative varus deformity. Therefore, the severity of varus knee deformity leads to a progressive laxity of the lateral soft tissue. However, regression coefficients after implantation were much smaller than those measured immediately after knee exposure (0.99 vs 0.20). Based on the results of the regression formula, the postoperative laxity of the lateral soft tissue was negligible, provided that an appropriate thickness of the implant was compensated for the bone and cartilage defect in the medial compartment without changing the joint line. Conclusion: The severity of varus knee deformity leads to a progressive laxity of the lateral soft tissue. However, even if the degree of preoperative varus deformity is severe, most cases may not require additional procedures to address the residual lateral laxity.

Is Standing Coronal Long-Leg Alignment View Effective in Predicting the Extent of Medial Soft Tissue Release in Varus Deformity during Total Knee Arthroplasty?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammadreza Minator Sajjadi ◽  
Mohammad Ali Okhovatpour ◽  
Yaser Safaei ◽  
Behrooz Faramarzi ◽  
Reza Zandi
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Soft Tissue Release ◽  
Varus Knee ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Leg Alignment ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Group 2

AbstractThe aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of the femoral intermechanical-anatomical angle (IMA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), femorotibial or varus angle (VA), and joint line convergence angle (CA) in predicting the stage of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) of varus knee. We evaluated 229 patients with osteoarthritic varus knee who underwent primary TKA, prospectively. They were categorized in three groups based on the extent of medial soft tissue release that performed during TKA Group 1, osteophytes removal and release of the deep MCL and posteromedial capsule (stage 1); Group 2, the release of the semimembranosus (stage 2); and Group 3, release of the superficial MCL (stage 3) and/or the pes anserinus (stage 4). We evaluated the preoperative standing coronal hip-knee-ankle alignment view to assessing the possible correlations between the knee angles and extent of soft tissue release. A significant difference was observed between the three groups in terms of preoperative VA, CA, and MPTA by using the Kruskal–Wallis test. The extent of medial release increased with increasing VA and CA as well as decreasing MPTA in preoperative long-leg standing radiographs. Finally, a patient with a preoperative VA larger than 19, CA larger than 6, or MPTA smaller than 81 would need a stage 3 or 4 of MCL release. The overall results showed that the VA and MPTA could be useful in predicting the extent of medial soft tissue release during TKA of varus knee.

scholarly journals Lateral epicondylar osteotomy for severe varus deformity during total knee arthroplasty

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-105
Author(s):  
Hong Chen ◽  
Wei Huang ◽  
Xi Liang ◽  
Ning Hu ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Total Knee

Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Severe Varus Deformity

1991 ◽  
Vol &NA; (273) ◽  
pp. 19???31 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEVEN M. TEENY ◽  
KENNETH A. KRACKOW ◽  
DAVID S. HUNGERFORD ◽  
MARK JONES
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Primary Total Knee

Primary Results of Medial Epicondylar Osteotomy in Patients with Severe Bilateral Varus Knee Candidate for Total Knee Replacement

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fardin Mirzatolooei ◽  
Ali Tabrizi ◽  
Hassan Taleb ◽  
Mohammad Khalegi Hashemian ◽  
Mir Bahram Safari
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Medial Release ◽  
Varus Angle

Background Total knee arthroplasty is a challenging task in patients with severe varus deformity. In most of these patients, an extensive medial release is needed that may lead to instability. Medial epicondylar osteotomy may be a better substitute for complete medial collateral release. Materials and Methods Fourteen patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis and severe varus deformity were enrolled in this study. In one side, the patients underwent medial epicondylar osteotomy for mediolateral imbalance if the only option was superficial medial collateral ligament (MCL) release. In contralateral side, the extensive medial release was performed and MCL was released either by pie-crusting technique or by subperiosteally release. The results of the two sides were compared. Patients were followed up for 12 months after the operation. Physical examination, clinical questionnaires, and radiography findings were recorded. Union of the osteotomies fragment and complications was evaluated. Results The mean varus angle before surgery was 21.6 ± 4.7 degrees, which was corrected to 8.6 ± 2.9 degrees after operation with an extensive medial release. The mean varus angle of contralateral side was 22.6 ± 1.7 degrees, which was corrected to 7.5 ± 2.3 degrees following medial femoral epicondyle osteotomy. There was no significant difference in varus correction (p = 0.1). Medial joint line opening in valgus stress test was 2.7 ± 0.4 mm in the osteotomized side and 3.5 ± 0.9 mm in contralateral side. Mean range of motion for the osteotomized side was 97.8 ± 4.3 degrees and 100.7 ± 2.7 degrees for contralateral side (p = 0.6). Nonunion occurred in a case in the osteotomized side and no medial instability was observed in medial release or osteotomies sides. No statistical difference was recorded based on clinical questionnaires (Oxford and WOMAC [Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index] scores). Conclusion Medial epicondylar osteotomy is a safe technique with the well-controlled medial extensive release in the patients with severe varus deformity during total knee arthroplasty.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document