Paper # 143: Clinical Results of a Novel Arthroscopically-Assisted Coracoclavicular Ligament Repair for Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Disruptions

Author(s):  
Craig R. Bottoni
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-14
Author(s):  
Noboru Matsumura ◽  
Yusuke Kawano ◽  
Ryogo Furuhata ◽  
Hiroo Kimura ◽  
Taku Suzuki ◽  
...  

Background: Although numerous treatment options for acromioclavicular joint dislocation have been reported, the treatment strategy is not yet standardized. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of coracoclavicular ligament repair with temporary acromioclavicular stabilization using suture anchors and Kirschner wires, and to compare the results between temporary trans-articular fixation and subacromial stabilization of the acromioclavicular joint. Methods: Thirty-three cases with displaced acromioclavicular joint dislocation were retrospectively evaluated. In the first 14 cases, the wires temporarily penetrated the joint for an average of 7 weeks (trans-articular group), while the acromioclavicular joint was temporarily stabilized by wires passing under the acromion that were inserted into the distal clavicle for an average of 13 weeks in the latter 19 cases (subacromial group). Clinical and radiographic results were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results: The average UCLA score was 32.0 points in the trans-articular group and 32.8 points in the subacromial group, indicating no difference between the two groups (P = 0.418). Coracoclavicular distance ratio after surgery was significantly smaller in the subacromial group (P ≤ 0.035), and acromioclavicular dislocation ratio after removal of the wires was also smaller in the subacromial group (P ≤ 0.001) compared with the trans-articular group. Conclusion: This study revealed that coracoclavicular ligament repair with temporary acromioclavicular stabilization leads to favorable clinical results, with the subacromial group showing better maintenance of joint reduction compared with the trans-articular group. Subacromial wire stabilization is a viable option for long-term temporary fixation of acute displaced acromioclavicular joint dislocation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-201
Author(s):  
Eu-Gene Kim ◽  
Hun-Kyu Shin ◽  
Haw-Jae Jeong ◽  
Jae-Yeol Choi ◽  
Se-Jin Park ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Fulu Sun ◽  
Shunchao Wang ◽  
Fei Zhang

Objective: To explore the treatment of TOSSY type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation with clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament repair and its clinical effect.Methods: 80 patients with TOSSY type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation who were admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to January 2019 were selected. They were randomly divided into the control group (n = 39, treated with clavicular hook plate) and the observation group (n = 41, treated with clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament repair) by the random number table method. The clinical efficacy in 12 months after operation, related clinical indicators, 12-month postoperative recovery and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results: The excellent and good rate was 92.68% (38/41) in 12 months after operation in the observation group, which was higher than that (76.92%, 30/39) in the control group (p < .05). There were no significant differences in the duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss and HLOS between the observation group and the control group (p > .05). In 12 months after operation, abduction activity and forward flexion activity of the observation group were higher than those of the control group, and visual analogue score (VAS) was lower than that of the control group (p < .05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was slightly lower than that in the control group, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p > .05).Conclusions: For TOSSY type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation, clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament repair has a good clinical efficacy. It can improve shoulder joint function, alleviate shoulder pain and have fewer complications. It can provide a reference for clinical treatment of this type of acromioclavicular joint dislocation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 2670-2677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Maziak ◽  
Laurent Audige ◽  
Carmen Hann ◽  
Marvin Minkus ◽  
Markus Scheibel

Background: Factors influencing the outcome after arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations remain poorly investigated. Purpose: To identify determinants of the radiological outcome and investigate associations between radiological and clinical outcome parameters. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent arthroscopically assisted stabilization for acute high-grade AC joint dislocations. The following potential determinants of the radiological outcome were examined using univariable and multivariable regression analyses: timing of surgery, initial AC joint reduction, isolated coracoclavicular (CC) versus combined CC and AC stabilization, ossification of the CC ligaments, age, and overweight status. In addition, associations between radiological (ie, CC difference, dynamic posterior translation [DPT]) and clinical outcome parameters (Subjective Shoulder Value, Taft score [TS] subjective subcategory, and Acromioclavicular Joint Instability Score [ACJI] pain subitem) were evaluated using univariable analysis. Results: One hundred four patients with a mean (±SD) age of 38.1 ± 11.5 years were included in this study. The mean postoperative follow-up was 2.2 ± 0.9 years. Compared with patients with an overreduced AC joint after surgery, the CC difference was 4.3 mm (95% CI, 1.3-7.3; P = .006) higher in patients with incomplete reduction. Patients with anatomic reduction were 3.1 times (95% CI, 1.2-7.9; P = .017) more likely to develop DPT than those with an overreduced AC joint. An incompletely reduced AC joint was 5.3 times (95% CI, 2.1-13.4; P < .001) more likely to develop DPT versus an overreduced AC joint. Patients who underwent isolated CC stabilization were 4.8 times (95% CI, 1.1-21.0; P = .039) more likely to develop complete DPT than patients with additional AC stabilization. Significantly higher CC difference values were noted for patients who reported pain on the subjective TS ( P = .025). Pain was encountered more commonly in patients with DPT ( PTS = .049; PACJI = .038). Conclusion: Clinicians should consider overreduction of the AC joint because it may lead to favorable radiological results. Because of its association with superior radiographic outcomes, consideration should also be given to the use of additional AC cerclage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document