Impact of posterior deep neck muscle treatment on cervical dystonia: Necessity to differentiate between abnormal positions of head and neck

Basal Ganglia ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harald Hefter ◽  
Ulrike Kahlen ◽  
Till R. Menge ◽  
Dietmar Rosenthal ◽  
Marek Moll
Author(s):  
Frank Lobbezoo ◽  
Marc Thu Thon ◽  
Guy Rémillard ◽  
Jacques Y. Montplaisir ◽  
Gilles J. Lavigne

AbstractObjective: The interactions between sleep, neck muscle activity, and cervical spinal pain were examined in a controlled study with nine patients suffering from idiopathic cervical dystonia (ICD; also referred to as spasmodic torticollis), and nine gender- and age-matched controls. Methods: From each participant, two all-night polysomnograms with additional electromyographic recordings from the sternocleidomastoid and upper trapezius muscles were obtained. The first night was for habituation to the laboratory environment; the second night for experimental data collection. Visual analogue scales were used to collect intensity and unpleasantness ratings of cervical spinal pain before and after the second sleep recording. Results: None of the standard sleep variables showed statistically significant differences between average values of both groups of participants. However, a significantly larger variance in sleep latency was obtained for the ICD patients. In general, abnormal cervical muscle activity decreased immediately when lying down without the intention to go to sleep. Subsequently, abnormal muscle contractions were gradually abolished in all ICD patients during the transition from relaxed wakefulness to light NREM sleep. Following this transition phase, no more abnormal EMG activity was found in any of our patients. Finally, cervical spinal pain intensity and unpleasantness were reduced by about 50% overnight. Conclusions: Both supine position and sleep can be associated with an improvement of symptoms of ICD, and this disorder does not induce any sleep perturbations.


2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 498-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Bove ◽  
Giampaolo Brichetto ◽  
Giovanni Abbruzzese ◽  
Roberta Marchese ◽  
Marco Schieppati

Author(s):  
Sang Hoon Kim ◽  
Tae Hyun Kim ◽  
Chul Won Yang ◽  
Sun A Choi ◽  
Seung Geun Yeo ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
pp. 121-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Diogo ◽  
Janine M. Ziermann ◽  
Julia Molnar ◽  
Natalia Siomava ◽  
Virginia Abdala

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 170-175
Author(s):  
James R. Funk ◽  
Richard A. Watson ◽  
Joseph M. Cormier ◽  
Herb Guzman ◽  
Enrique Bonugli

Previous studies on neck muscle strength and motion have assumed or imposed varying constraints on the heads and bodies of the subjects. In this study, we asked 20 subjects to vigorously shake their heads 5−10 times in a completely unconstrained manner. The kinematics and kinetics of the head and neck were measured from video analysis and instrumentation mounted inside the mouth. Subjects shook their heads at self-selected tempos ranging from 1.9−4.7 Hz over a 20−91° range of motion. The motion of each subject’s head could be approximated by a fixed center of rotation that was typically located in the midcervical spine, but varied widely among subjects. Significant differences between men and women were observed. Peak head accelerations were low (4.3 ± 1.1 g and 250 ± 103 rad/s2 for men, 3.0 ± 0.9 g and 182 ± 58 rad/s2 for women) and estimated peak generated neck moments at C7/T1 were comparable to values reported in isometric neck strength studies (47 ± 14 N·m in extension and 22 ± 9 N·m in flexion for men, 25 ± 8 N·m in extension and 9 ± 7 N·m in flexion for women).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document