Gap analysis of terrestrial vertebrates in Italy: Priorities for conservation planning in a human dominated landscape

2006 ◽  
Vol 133 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Maiorano ◽  
Alessandra Falcucci ◽  
Luigi Boitani
Oryx ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 42 (04) ◽  
pp. 567 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho ◽  
Luis Mauricio Bini ◽  
Míriam Plaza Pinto ◽  
Levi Carina Terribile ◽  
Guilherme de Oliveira ◽  
...  

Science ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 372 (6544) ◽  
pp. 856-860
Author(s):  
Louise M. J. O’Connor ◽  
Laura J. Pollock ◽  
Julien Renaud ◽  
Willem Verhagen ◽  
Peter H. Verburg ◽  
...  

There is an urgent need to protect key areas for biodiversity and nature’s contributions to people (NCP). However, different values of nature are rarely considered together in conservation planning. Here, we explore potential priority areas in Europe for biodiversity (all terrestrial vertebrates) and a set of cultural and regulating NCP while considering demand for these NCP. We quantify the spatial overlap between these priorities and their performance in representing different values of nature. We show that different priorities rarely coincide, except in certain irreplaceable ecosystems. Notably, priorities for biodiversity better represent NCP than the reverse. Theoretically, protecting an extra 5% of land has the potential to double conservation gains for biodiversity while also maintaining some essential NCP, leading to co-benefits for both nature and people.


2006 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Puric-Mladenovic ◽  
S. Strobl

Protected lands form an essential component of landscape planning, and often extend beyond protection of existing natural areas to consider enhancement through restoration to improve existing conditions. We tested an automated conservation science-based methodology and systematic approach to delineate conservation and restoration priority areas on the Oak Ridges Moraine (ORM). The methodology comprised: a) preparing and assembling existing spatial (GIS) information and tessellating the study area to 5-ha hexagon planning units; b) conducting a gap analysis to provide a basis for setting conservation targets that protect, or that through future restoration activities might enhance, under-represented biodiversity elements; and c) applying a simulated annealing procedure (i.e., mathematical algorithm) to find solutions that optimize the set biodiversity targets. The final output of our work is a map of conservation priority area that enables the more than 50 conservation partners in this landscape to coordinate various conservation, stewardship and restoration activities by focusing on those areas that have the highest conservation value. Key words: restoration, settled landscapes, conservation planning, mathematical algorithm


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke J Sutton ◽  
David L Anderson ◽  
Miguel Franco ◽  
Christopher JW McClure ◽  
Everton BP Miranda ◽  
...  

Quantifying habitat use is important for understanding how animals meet their requirements for survival and provides useful information for conservation planning. Currently, assessments of range-wide habitat use that delimit species distributions are incomplete for many taxa. The harpy eagle (Harpia harpyja) is a raptor of conservation concern, widely distributed across Neotropical lowland forests, that currently faces threats from increasing habitat loss and fragmentation. Here, we use a logistic regression modelling framework to identify habitat resource selection and predict habitat suitability based on a new method developed from the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Area of Habitat range metric. From the habitat use model, we performed a gap analysis to identify areas of high habitat suitability in regions with limited coverage in the Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) network. Range-wide habitat use indicated that harpy eagles prefer areas of 70-75 % evergreen forest cover, low elevation, and high vegetation heterogeneity. Conversely, harpy eagles avoid areas of >10 % cultivated landcover and mosaic forest, and topographically complex areas. Our habitat use model identified a large continuous area across the pan-Amazonia region, and a habitat corridor from the Chocó-Darién ecoregion of Colombia running north along the Caribbean coast of Central America. Little habitat was predicted across the Atlantic Forest biome, which is now severely degraded. The current KBA network covered 18 % of medium to high suitability harpy eagle habitat exceeding the target representation (10 %). Four major areas of high suitability habitat lacking coverage in the KBA network were identified in the Chocó-Darién ecoregion of Colombia, western Guyana, and north-west Brazil. We recommend these multiple gaps of habitat as new KBAs for strengthening the current KBA network. Modelled area of habitat estimates as described here are a useful tool for large-scale conservation planning and can be readily applied to many taxa.


AMBIO ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 527-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Angelstam ◽  
Grzegorz Mikusiński ◽  
Britt-Inger Rönnbäck ◽  
Anders Östman ◽  
Marius Lazdinis ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 802-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis-Vincent Lemelin ◽  
Marcel Darveau

This paper compares the principal concepts and methodologies that have been developed in conservation planning over the past few decades. Of these, the terms coarse filter and fine filter have been used inconsistently, we propose, therefore, consensual grounds for a definition. The term "gap analysis" has been used to refer to the prescriptive methodology of Gap Analysis and the latter is not consensual among conservation biologists. Nevertheless Gap Analysis has contributed greatly, along with the systematic conservation planning methodology, to the development of conservation planning. Overall, conservation planning has proved sound enough to merit interest and involvement from forest managers. Key words: coarse filter, fine filter, gap analysis, systematic conservation planning, ecological representation, protected areas


Science ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 341 (6150) ◽  
pp. 1100-1103 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. N. Joppa ◽  
P. Visconti ◽  
C. N. Jenkins ◽  
S. L. Pimm

Identifying which areas capture how many species is the first question in conservation planning. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) aspires to formal protection of at least 17% of the terrestrial world and, through the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation, 60% of plant species. Are these targets of protecting area and species compatible? We show that 67% of plant species live entirely within regions that comprise 17% of the land surface. Moreover, these regions include most terrestrial vertebrates with small geographical ranges. However, the connections between the CBD targets of protecting area and species are complex. Achieving both targets will be difficult because regions with the most plant species have only slightly more land protected than do those with fewer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document