WITHDRAWN: The mesenchymal stem cell potential of human dental pulp derived cells transfected with embryonic transcription factor Oct-4

Author(s):  
Xuechao Yang ◽  
Yaojia Lu ◽  
Xin Pang ◽  
Siyuan Zhang ◽  
Mingwen Fan
2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 1969-1980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Bertolo ◽  
Frank Steffen ◽  
Cherry Malonzo-Marty ◽  
Jivko Stoyanov

2016 ◽  
Vol 203 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiao Yi ◽  
Ousheng Liu ◽  
Fei Yan ◽  
Xiao Lin ◽  
Shu Diao ◽  
...  

Introduction: Dental pulp stem cell (DPSC)-mediated dental pulp regeneration is considered a promising method for the treatment of deep caries with pulpitis. However, mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) senescence is an adverse factor from the perspective of cell-based therapies. In this study, we investigated the characteristics and expression profiles of DPSCs from young and old donors. Methods: DPSCs from young and old donors were cultured in differentiation medium, and their differentiation potentials were assessed. Long noncoding RNA (LncRNA) microarray assays and a bioinformatic analysis were performed to investigate differences in LncRNA and mRNA expression profiles between DPSCs from young and old donors. Results: We found that DPSCs from young donors exhibited more powerful proliferation ability and greater osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation potentials than DPSCs from old donors. In DPSCs from young donors, numerous LncRNAs were significantly up- (n = 389) or down-regulated (n = 172) compared to DPSCs from old donors. Furthermore, 304 mRNAs were differentially expressed, including 247 up-regulated genes and 57 down-regulated genes in DPSCs from young donors. The bioinformatic analysis identified that several pathways may be associated with DPSC characteristics, such as those involved in the cell cycle and RNA transport, and revealed nuclear transcription factor Y subunit β, general transcription factor IIB, and nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 1 as core regulatory factors and FR249114, FR299091, and ENST00000450004 as core LncRNAs. Conclusions: Our results indicated that senescence impaired the proliferation and differentiation potentials of DPSCs and that donor age is an important factor that affects their use for tooth regeneration. We also provide insight into the mechanisms responsible for senescence in DPSCs.


2010 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 1076-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lusine Aghajanova ◽  
Jose A. Horcajadas ◽  
Francisco J. Esteban ◽  
Linda C. Giudice

Cytotherapy ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Martin ◽  
K. Helm ◽  
P. Ruegg ◽  
M. Varella-Garcia ◽  
E. Burnham ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeon-Jeong Lee ◽  
Byung-Joon Park ◽  
Ryoung-Hoon Jeon ◽  
Si-Jung Jang ◽  
Young-Bum Son ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Mercado ◽  
Gabi Schutzius ◽  
Christian Kolter ◽  
David Estoppey ◽  
Sebastian Bergling ◽  
...  

Abstract Resident adult epithelial stem cells maintain tissue homeostasis by balancing self-renewal and differentiation. The stem cell potential of human epidermal keratinocytes is retained in vitro but lost over time suggesting extrinsic and intrinsic regulation. Transcription factor-controlled regulatory circuitries govern cell identity, are sufficient to induce pluripotency and transdifferentiate cells. We investigate whether transcriptional circuitry also governs phenotypic changes within a given cell type by comparing human primary keratinocytes with intrinsically high versus low stem cell potential. Using integrated chromatin and transcriptional profiling, we implicate IRF2 as antagonistic to stemness and show that it binds and regulates active cis-regulatory elements at interferon response and antigen presentation genes. CRISPR-KD of IRF2 in keratinocytes with low stem cell potential increases self-renewal, migration and epidermis formation. These data demonstrate that transcription factor regulatory circuitries, in addition to maintaining cell identity, control plasticity within cell types and offer potential for therapeutic modulation of cell function.


2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 2340-2350 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mazor ◽  
E. Lespessailles ◽  
R. Coursier ◽  
R. Daniellou ◽  
T. M. Best ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 68-69
Author(s):  
Fiona Spratt ◽  
Suzanne Micallef ◽  
Brenda Williams ◽  
Michele Cook ◽  
Ivan Bertoncello

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document