scholarly journals Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission effects of biodiesel in the United States with induced land use change impacts

2018 ◽  
Vol 251 ◽  
pp. 249-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Chen ◽  
Zhangcai Qin ◽  
Jeongwoo Han ◽  
Michael Wang ◽  
Farzad Taheripour ◽  
...  
Eos ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randy Showstack

Before the climate summit in Paris this November and December, the United States and some other countries have submitted their targets to cut emissions.


1995 ◽  
Vol 38-38 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 109-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. V. Braatz ◽  
S. Brown ◽  
A. O. Isichei ◽  
E. O. Odada ◽  
R. J. Scholes ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 118002
Author(s):  
Melissa J Scully ◽  
Gregory A Norris ◽  
Tania M Alarcon Falconi ◽  
David L MacIntosh

Abstract Spawn-Lee et al published a comment on our recent paper, ‘Carbon intensity of corn ethanol in the United States: state of the science.’ Their commentary is critical of our methodology and conclusions regarding greenhouse gas (GHG) life cycle analyses (LCAs) for corn starch ethanol and gives particular attention to the estimation of emissions from land use change (LUC). Several of the concerns stated by Spawn-Lee et al were raised in prior publications and are addressed in the recently published literature, thus, we respond to those points in brief and refer readers to those papers for more information. In response to their remaining concerns, we present detailed information in support of our approach for assessing LCAs of corn starch ethanol and our findings. Our original paper and the corroborating information provided here demonstrate that our methods are robust and our results are credible. Further, we hope this response contributes to constructive discussion and research on estimation of GHG emissions and LUC linked to corn starch ethanol.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document