scholarly journals Effect of central venous pressure on back-flow and bolus events during vasopressor syringe changeover. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2020; 125: 622–628

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (6) ◽  
pp. e463-e464
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Russotto ◽  
Stefano Elli ◽  
Roberto Rona ◽  
Alberto Lucchini
2006 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline S. C. Belela ◽  
Mavilde L. G. Pedreira ◽  
Maria Angélica S. Peterlini ◽  
Denise M. Kusahara ◽  
Werther B. Carvalho ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 230-236
Author(s):  
Barry Hill ◽  
Catherine Smith

Patients who present with acute cardiovascular compromise require haemodynamic monitoring in a critical care unit. Central venous pressure (CVP) is the most frequently used measure to guide fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. It is most often done via a central venous catheter (CVC) positioned in the right atrium or superior or inferior vena cava as close to the right atrium as possible. The CVC is inserted via the internal jugular vein, subclavian vein or via the femoral vein, depending on the patient and their condition. Complications of CVC placement can be serious, so its risks and benefits need to be considered. Alternative methods to CVC use include transpulmonary thermodilution and transoesophageal Doppler ultrasound. Despite its widespread use, CVP has been challenged in many studies, which have reported it to be a poor predictor of haemodynamic responsiveness. However, it is argued that CVP monitoring provides important physiologic information for the evaluation of haemodynamic instability. Nurses have central roles during catheter insertion and in CVP monitoring, as well as in managing these patients and assessing risks.


2012 ◽  
pp. 181-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johann Smith Ceron Arias ◽  
Manuel Felipe Muñoz Nañez

The determination of the values of central venous pressure has long been used as a guideline for volumetric therapy in the resuscitation of the critical patient, but the performance of such parameter is currently being questioned as an effective measurement of cardiac preload. This has aroused great interest in the search for more accurate parameters to determine cardiac preload and a patient’s blood volume. Goals and Methodology: Based on literature currently available, we aim to discuss the performance of central venous pressure as an effective parameter to determine cardiac preload. Results and Conclusion: Estimating variables such as end-diastolic ventricular area and global end-diastolic volume have a better performance than central venous pressure in determining cardiac preload. Despite the best performance of these devices, central venous pressure is still considered in our setting as the most practical and most commonly available way to assess the patient’s preload. Only dynamic variables such as pulse pressure change are superior in determining an individual’s blood volume.


2016 ◽  
Vol 200 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva See Wah Cheng ◽  
Julie Hallet ◽  
Sherif S. Hanna ◽  
Calvin H.L. Law ◽  
Natalie G. Coburn ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document