Central venous pressure monitoring in critical care settings

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 230-236
Author(s):  
Barry Hill ◽  
Catherine Smith
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Right Atrium ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Haemodynamic Monitoring ◽  
Haemodynamic Instability ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
The Right

Patients who present with acute cardiovascular compromise require haemodynamic monitoring in a critical care unit. Central venous pressure (CVP) is the most frequently used measure to guide fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. It is most often done via a central venous catheter (CVC) positioned in the right atrium or superior or inferior vena cava as close to the right atrium as possible. The CVC is inserted via the internal jugular vein, subclavian vein or via the femoral vein, depending on the patient and their condition. Complications of CVC placement can be serious, so its risks and benefits need to be considered. Alternative methods to CVC use include transpulmonary thermodilution and transoesophageal Doppler ultrasound. Despite its widespread use, CVP has been challenged in many studies, which have reported it to be a poor predictor of haemodynamic responsiveness. However, it is argued that CVP monitoring provides important physiologic information for the evaluation of haemodynamic instability. Nurses have central roles during catheter insertion and in CVP monitoring, as well as in managing these patients and assessing risks.

Accuracy of Central Venous Pressure Measuremet From the Abdominal Inferior Vena Cava

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 506-508
Author(s):  
THOMAS R. LLOYD ◽  
RICHARD L. DONNERSTEIN ◽  
ROBERT A. BERG
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Vena Cava ◽  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Right Atrium ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Pressure Measurements ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Right

Central venous pressure measurements in the abdominal inferior vena cava were compared with measurements in the right atrium in 10 infants and 10 children during cardiac catheterization. At end expiration, the mean pressures at these two sites were within 1 mm Hg of each other in all 20 patients, with a mean difference of 0.0 ± 0.36 mm Hg. The abdominal inferior vena cava is a safe and convenient site for measurement of central venous pressure, and our study confirms that such measurements are accurate.

Renal response to atrial stretch during pregnancy in conscious rats

1993 ◽  
Vol 265 (4) ◽  
pp. R902-R906 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kaufman ◽  
Y. Deng
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Urine Volume ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Virgin Female ◽  
Free Water ◽  
Female Rats ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Renal Response ◽  
The Right

Chronic indwelling balloons were placed at the junction of the right atrium and the right superior vena cava of virgin female rats. The renal response to discrete standardized atrial stretch was tested in the conscious animals. The rats were then mated, and the renal response was retested at days 7, 14, and 20 of pregnancy. On day 21, the rats were killed, and the pressure-volume relationship of the right atria was measured. In response to atrial stretch, there was an increase in urine volume, urine sodium output, and urine potassium output and a decrease in free water clearance in the virgin rats. Subsequent to mating, these responses were completely abolished at all stages of pregnancy. The renal responses to atrial stretch were also abolished during pseudopregnancy. Central venous pressure did not change when the intracardiac balloons were inflated; there were also no changes in resting central venous pressure during pregnancy. There were no significant changes in unstressed atrial volume or in atrial compliance during pregnancy.

scholarly journals Respiratory variation of inferior vena cava diameter and central venous pressure in ventilated and non-ventilated children in fluid refractory septic shock: an observational study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 1947
Author(s):  
Mohd Kashif Ali ◽  
Eeman Naim
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Inferior Vena Cava ◽  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Spontaneously Breathing ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Background: Ultrasound guided fluid assessment in management of septic shock has come up as an adjunct to the current gold standard Central Venous Pressure monitoring. This study was designed to observe the respiro-phasic variation of IVC diameter (RV-IVCD) in invasively mechanically ventilated and spontaneously breathing paediatric patients of fluid refractory septic shock.Methods: This was a prospective observational study done at Paediatric intensive Care Unit (PICU) in Paediatric ward of Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital (JNMCH) from February 2016 to June 2017. 107 consecutive patients between 1 year to 16 years age who were in shock despite 40ml/kg of fluid administration were included. Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) diameters were measured at end-expiration and end inspiration and the IVC collapsibility index was calculated. Simultaneously Central Venous Pressure (CVP) was recorded. Both values were obtained in ventilated and non-ventilated patients. Data was analysed to determine to look for the profile of RV-IVCD and CVP in ventilated and non-ventilated cases.Results: Out of 107 patients, 91 were on invasive mechanical ventilation and 16 patients were spontaneously breathing. There was a strong negative correlation between central venous pressure (CVP) and inferior vena cava collapsibility (RV-IVCD) in both spontaneously breathing (-0.810) and mechanically ventilated patients (-0.700). Negative correlation was significant in both study groups in CVP <8 mmHg and only in spontaneously breathing patients in CVP 8-12 mmHg range. IVC collapsibility showed a decreasing trend with rising CVP in both spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated patients.Conclusion: Ultrasonography guided IVCCI appears to be a valuable index in assessing fluid status in both spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated septic shock patients. However, more data is required from the paediatric population so as to define it as standard of practice.

scholarly journals Measurement of Inferior Ven Cava Collapsibility Index and Its Correlation to Central Venous Pressure in Adult Critically Ill Patients a Prospective Observational Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Vena Cava ◽  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Volume Status ◽  
P Value ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Collapsibility Index ◽  
Status Assessment

Fluid therapy is an essential component part management of critically ill patients. Proper estimation of the amount of needed fluids is of great importance due to the well-established adverse effects of marked negative and positive fluids balance. Central venous pressure has been widely used by ICU physicians for volume status assessment. Several methods have been postulated for volume status assessment, among which is the inferior vena cava collapsibility index. As the inferior vena cava is a thin-walled capacitance vessel that adjusts to the body’s volume status by changing its diameter depending on the total body fluid volume. Giving the fact that bed-side ultrasonographic measurement of inferior vena cava diameters is an available, non-invasive, reproducible and quiet easy-to-learn technique, it can provide a safe and quiet reliable replacement of central venous pressure measurement for assessment of volume status assessment. The aim of this study was to find statistical correlation between central venous pressure and caval index, as a step towards validating the above mentioned replacement. 86 critically ill patients from ICU population were enrolled. Simultaneous measurements of central venous pressure and inferior vena cava collapsibility index were observed and recorded on four sessions. Patients were also grouped based on their mode of ventilation and central venous pressure values in order to compare the strength of correlation between various populations. The results showed that Inferior vena cava collapsibility index has significant inverse correlation with CVP value (r= -85, p value ˂0.001 at 95% CI) and it better correlated with mean arterial blood pressure and lactate clearance as compared to central venous pressure. However it correlated better with CVP in spontaneously breathing patients (r= -0.86, p value ˂0.001) than in mechanically ventilated patients (r= -0.84, p value ˂0.001). Inferior vena cava collapsibility index has shown to correlate better with CVP value in lower values (˂ 10 cmH2O) (r= -0.8, p value ˂0.001) than in higher values (≥ 10 cmH2O) (r= -0.6, p value ˂0.001). In addition, an inferior vena caval collapsibility index cut-off value of 29% was shown to discriminate between CVP values ˂10 cmH2O and values ≥10 cmH2O with high Sensitivity (88.6%) and specificity (80.4%). In conclusion, inferior vena cava collapsibility index has a strong inverse relationship with central venous pressure which is more pronounced at low central venous pressure values. Point-of-care ultrasonographically-measured inferior vena cava collapsibility index is very likely to be a good alternative to central venous pressure measurement with a high degree of precision and reproducibility. However, Wide scale studies are needed to validate its use in different patient populations.

Ultrasound Guided Noninvasive Measurement of Central Venous Pressure

2008 ◽  
pp. 1331-1337
Author(s):  
Vikram Aggarwal ◽  
Yoonju Cho ◽  
Aniruddha Chatterjee ◽  
Dickson Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Systemic Circulation ◽  
The Body ◽  
Physiological Parameter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Mean Pressure

Central venous pressure (CVP) is a measure of the mean pressure within the thoracic vena cava, which is the largest vein in the body and responsible for returning blood from the systemic circulation to the heart. CVP is a major determinant of the filling pressure and cardiac preload, and like any fluid pump, the heart depends on an adequate preload to function effectively. Low venous return translates into a lower preload and a drop in overall cardiac output, a relationship described by the Frank-Starling Mechanism. CVP is an important physiological parameter, the correct measure of which is a clinically relevant diagnostic tool for heart failure patients. In addition to other vitals such as heart rate and mean arterial pressure, accurate measures of central venous pressure through simple diagnostic instrumentation would provide physicians with a clear picture of cardiac functionality, and allow for more targeted treatment. Recent literature has also shown that measuring CVP can be an important hemodynamic indicator for the early identification and treatment of more widespread conditions, such as sepsis (Rivers, Nguyen, Havstad, & Ressler, 2001). With over five million patients (American Heart Association, http://www.americanheart.org/presenter. jhtml) in the U.S. presenting with heart failure-like symptoms annually, a current challenge for physicians is to obtain a quick and accurate measure of a patient’s central venous pressure in a manner that poses minimum discomfort.

scholarly journals Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava Suggested by an Unusual Central Venous Pressure Waveform

2020 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. e15-e17
Author(s):  
Sujana Dontukurthy ◽  
Yoshikazu Yamaguchi ◽  
Joseph D. Tobias
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Pressure ◽  
Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Coronary Sinus ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Left Superior Vena Cava ◽  
Persistent Left Superior Vena ◽  
Defect Repair

Abstract Background A persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is the most common congenital anomaly of the thoracic venous return. Case Description During atrial septal defect repair, a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter was placed via the left internal jugular vein. Although placement of the PA catheter in the main PA was confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography, the central venous pressure (CVP) waveform was abnormal. Intraoperatively, the PA catheter was seen exiting the coronary sinus with the CVP port within the coronary sinus. Conclusions The diagnosis of PLSVC is discussed and the differential diagnosis of the abnormal “ventricular” pattern of the CVP waveform is reviewed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document