scholarly journals Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction using biodegradable (NasoPore) and non-biodegradable packing, a double-blind, prospective, randomized study

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pawel Krzysztof Burduk ◽  
Malgorzata Wierzchowska ◽  
Blazej Grześkowiak ◽  
Wojciech Kaźmierczak ◽  
Katarzyna Wawrzyniak
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1620
Author(s):  
Richard Lass ◽  
Boris Olischar ◽  
Bernd Kubista ◽  
Thomas Waldhoer ◽  
Alexander Giurea ◽  
...  

The purpose of this study is to compare computer-assisted to manual implantation-techniques in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to find out if the computer-assisted surgery is able to improve the clinical and functional results and reduce the dislocation rate in short-terms after THA. We performed a concise minimum 2-year follow-up of the patient cohort of a prospective randomized study published in 2014 and evaluated if the higher implantation accuracy in the navigated group can be seen as an important determinant of success in total hip arthroplasty. Although a significant difference was found in mean postoperative acetabular component anteversion and in the outliers regarding inclination and anteversion (p < 0.05) between the computer-assisted and the manual-placed group, we could not find significant differences regarding clinical outcome or revision rates at 2-years follow-up. The implantation accuracy in the navigated group can be regarded as an important determinant of success in THA, although no significant differences in clinical outcome could be detected at short-term follow-up. Therefore, further long-term follow-up of our patient group is needed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 36-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Alison Wang ◽  
Shih-Ping Chen ◽  
Chen-Fang Horng ◽  
Ling-Ling Hsieh ◽  
Kai-Hsin Hsu ◽  
...  

36 Background: Generalist involvement in cancer survivorship care is becoming a global trend, however, significant barriers exist. As a major cancer center in Taiwan, KF-SYSCC is implementing an academic institution-based comprehensive survivorship program, a PCP-coordinated care delivery model. Our goal is to promote health, manage chronic diseases, attend to psychosocial needs, and optimize health care resources without compromising cancer-related clinical outcome or patient satisfaction. Methods: We designed a randomized study with staggered transition of stage 0-3 breast cancer patients from oncologist care to the PCP-coordinated program at one or two years after cancer surgery. The outcomes for comparing the two care models include late effects of breast cancer treatment, anxiety and depression, health-related quality of life, recurrence-related clinical outcome, preventive care, chronic disease management, patient satisfaction, and health services utilization. Questionnaires were given every 6 months from 6 to 30 months after surgery. Results: Within six months, 270 eligible individuals were approached with an enrollment rate of 58% (target sample 1,200). The barriers for non-enrollment include: having established relationship with oncologist, transfer time too soon, lack of trust for non-oncologist, unwilling to change care provider, treatment not yet completed. The 113 non-participants did not differ from the 157 participants in age or cancer characteristics. Between the 1-year and 2-year transfer groups, there were no significant differences in demographics, tumor characteristics and treatment modalities. The initial BCPT and SF-36 questionnaires showed poorer performance in the areas of hot flashes, pain, cognition, weight, role physical, energy, and health perception, as compared with areas of bladder, vaginal, arm problems, physical and social functioning, mental health, and role emotional. Conclusions: We have started a randomized study to evaluate a generalist care model to survivorship care. Baseline patient characteristics were defined. Several barriers to the transition of the new care delivery model were identified.


2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 410-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naseer M. Akhtar ◽  
Rizwan Naseer ◽  
Abid Z. Farooqi ◽  
Wajahat Aziz ◽  
Mussadeq Nazir

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document