scholarly journals Self-Organization and Force Production by the Branched Actin Cytoskeleton during Mammalian Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 313a ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Akamatsu ◽  
Ritvik Vasan ◽  
David G. Drubin ◽  
Daniel Serwas ◽  
Padmini Rangamani
2019 ◽  
Vol 132 (5) ◽  
pp. jcs220780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salma Jalal ◽  
Shidong Shi ◽  
Vidhyalakshmi Acharya ◽  
Ruby Yun-Ju Huang ◽  
Virgile Viasnoff ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salma Jalal ◽  
Ruby Yun-Ju Huang ◽  
Virgile Viasnoff ◽  
Yee Han Tee ◽  
Alexander Bershadsky

AbstractWe systematically investigated the principles of actin cytoskeleton self-organization in two cell types, fibroblasts and epitheliocytes, by confining isolated cells on isotropic adhesive islands of varying size. In fibroblasts, we previously described that an initially circular pattern of circumferential actin dynamically evolves into a radial pattern of actin bundles that spontaneously transforms into a chiral pattern, before finally producing parallel linear stress fibres. We now show that progression from circular to chiral actin patterns depends on cell projected area and rarely occurs on small islands. Epitheliocytes however, did not exhibit succession through all the actin patterns described above even on large islands. Upon confinement, the actin cytoskeleton in non-keratinocyte epitheliocytes is arrested at the circular stage, while in keratinocytes it can progress as far as the radial pattern but still cannot break symmetry. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition pushed actin cytoskeleton development from circular towards radial patterns but remains insufficient to cause chirality. Surprisingly, small doses of G-actin sequestering drug, latrunculin A, induced chiral swirling in keratinocytes. During this swirling, keratin filaments follow actin and also demonstrate chiral swirling movement. Elimination of the keratin network by genetic silencing of Type II keratins, however, did not affect the self-organization of the actin cytoskeleton.


2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 445-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yee Han Tee ◽  
Tom Shemesh ◽  
Visalatchi Thiagarajan ◽  
Rizal Fajar Hariadi ◽  
Karen L. Anderson ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 373 (1747) ◽  
pp. 20170114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kinjal Dasbiswas ◽  
Shiqiong Hu ◽  
Frank Schnorrer ◽  
Samuel A. Safran ◽  
Alexander D. Bershadsky

Myosin II filaments form ordered superstructures in both cross-striated muscle and non-muscle cells. In cross-striated muscle, myosin II (thick) filaments, actin (thin) filaments and elastic titin filaments comprise the stereotypical contractile units of muscles called sarcomeres. Linear chains of sarcomeres, called myofibrils, are aligned laterally in registry to form cross-striated muscle cells. The experimentally observed dependence of the registered organization of myofibrils on extracellular matrix elasticity has been proposed to arise from the interactions of sarcomeric contractile elements (considered as force dipoles) through the matrix. Non-muscle cells form small bipolar filaments built of less than 30 myosin II molecules. These filaments are associated in registry forming superstructures (‘stacks’) orthogonal to actin filament bundles. Formation of myosin II filament stacks requires the myosin II ATPase activity and function of the actin filament crosslinking, polymerizing and depolymerizing proteins. We propose that the myosin II filaments embedded into elastic, intervening actin network (IVN) function as force dipoles that interact attractively through the IVN. This is in analogy with the theoretical picture developed for myofibrils where the elastic medium is now the actin cytoskeleton itself. Myosin stack formation in non-muscle cells provides a novel mechanism for the self-organization of the actin cytoskeleton at the level of the entire cell. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Self-organization in cell biology’.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Akamatsu ◽  
Ritvik Vasan ◽  
Daniel Serwas ◽  
Michael A Ferrin ◽  
Padmini Rangamani ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 102 (8) ◽  
pp. 1746-1756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Shemesh ◽  
Alexander D. Bershadsky ◽  
Michael M. Kozlov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document