Influence of hippocampal low-frequency stimulation on GABAA R α1, ICER and BNDF expression level in brain tissues of amygdala-kindled drug-resistant temporal lobe epileptic rats

2018 ◽  
Vol 1698 ◽  
pp. 195-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaya Xu ◽  
Zhaoyang Liu ◽  
Likun Wang ◽  
Guofeng Wu ◽  
Tao Liu
Epilepsia ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saifur Rashid ◽  
Gerald Pho ◽  
Michael Czigler ◽  
Mary A. Werz ◽  
Dominique M. Durand

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enya Paschen ◽  
Claudio Elgueta ◽  
Katharina Heining ◽  
Diego M Vieira ◽  
Piret Kleis ◽  
...  

Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) is the most common form of focal, pharmacoresistant epilepsy in adults and is often associated with hippocampal sclerosis. Here, we established the efficacy of optogenetic and electrical low-frequency stimulation (LFS) in interfering with seizure generation in a mouse model of MTLE. Specifically, we applied LFS in the sclerotic hippocampus to study the effects on spontaneous subclinical and evoked generalized seizures. We found that stimulation at 1 Hz for 1 hr resulted in an almost complete suppression of spontaneous seizures in both hippocampi. This seizure-suppressive action during daily stimulation remained stable over several weeks. Furthermore, LFS for 30 min before a pro-convulsive stimulus successfully prevented seizure generalization. Finally, acute slice experiments revealed a reduced efficacy of perforant path transmission onto granule cells upon LFS. Taken together, our results suggest that hippocampal LFS constitutes a promising approach for seizure control in MTLE.


2005 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 1005-1013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konosuke Yamasaki ◽  
Shuitsu Harada ◽  
Itsuro Higuchi ◽  
Mitsuhiro Osame ◽  
Gakuji Ito

1957 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. C. Lloyd

An assemblage of individual motoneurons constituting a synthetic motoneuron pool has been studied from the standpoint of relating monosynaptic reflex responses to frequency of afferent stimulation. Intensity of low frequency depression is not a simple function of transmitter potentiality. As frequency of stimulation increases from 3 per minute to 10 per second, low frequency depression increases in magnitude. Between 10 and approximately 60 per second low frequency depression apparently diminishes and subnormality becomes a factor in causing depression. At frequencies above 60 per second temporal summation occurs, but subnormality limits the degree of response attainable by summation. At low stimulation frequencies rhythm is determined by stimulation frequency. Interruptions of rhythmic firing depend solely upon temporal fluctuation of excitability. At high frequency of stimulation rhythm is determined by subnormality rather than inherent rhythmicity, and excitability fluctuation leads to instability of response rhythm. In short, whatever the stimulation frequency, random excitability fluctuation is the factor disrupting rhythmic response. Monosynaptic reflex response latency is stable during high frequency stimulation as it is in low frequency stimulation provided a significant extrinsic source of random bombardment is not present. In the presence of powerful random bombardment discharge may become random with respect to monosynaptic afferent excitation provided the latter is feeble. When this occurs it does so equally at low frequency and high frequency. Thus temporal summation is not a necessary factor. There is, then, no remaining evidence to suggest that the agency for temporal summation in the monosynaptic system becomes a transmitting agency in its own right.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document