Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: results of intradermal periareolar tracer injection and follow-up of sentinel lymph node-negative patients

The Breast ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 290-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.J.P. van Wessem ◽  
W.S. Meijer
2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Nathan R. Brand ◽  
Ronald Wasike ◽  
Khalid Makhdomi ◽  
Rajendra Chauhan ◽  
Zahir Moloo ◽  
...  

Purpose The goal of this study was to describe the pathologic findings and early follow-up experience of patients who underwent a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) at Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) between 2008 and 2017. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of women with breast cancer who underwent an SLNB at AKUH between 2008 and 2017. The SLNB was performed on patients with stage I and stage II breast cancer, and identification of the sentinel lymph node was made by radioactive tracer, blue dye, or both, per availability and surgeon preference. Demographic, surgical, and pathologic data, including immunohistochemistry of the surgical sample for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, were abstracted from the patient records. Follow-up data were available for a subset of patients. Results Between 2008 and 2017, six surgeons performed SLNBs on 138 women, 129 of whom had complete records and were included in the study. Thirty-one of 129 (24%) had a positive SLNB, including 10 of 73 (14%) with stage I and 21 of 56 (38%) with stage II disease. Seventy-eight patients (60%) received systemic adjuvant chemotherapy and 79 (62%) received radiation therapy, and of the 102 patients who were estrogen receptor positive, 86 (85%) received endocrine therapy. Seventy-nine patients were observed for > 2 years, and, of these, four (5.1%) had a regional recurrence. Conclusion The SLNB positivity rates were similar to those of high-income country (HIC) cohorts. However, preliminary data suggest that recurrence rates are elevated at AKUH as compared with those of HIC cohorts, perhaps because of a lower use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy at AKUH compared with HIC cohorts or because of differences in the characteristics of the primary tumor in patients at AKUH as compared with those in HICs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12608-e12608
Author(s):  
Laura Sheriff ◽  
Erin Cordeiro ◽  
Jacob Hardy ◽  
Amanda Roberts

e12608 Background: Post-mastectomy radiation (PMRT) reduces the risk of locoregional failure for women with an elevated risk of recurrence from breast cancer. Therefore, PMRT is often indicated for women with node positive breast cancer including those with only 1-3 nodes involved. The need for PMRT in node negative breast cancer patients is less established. The objective of our study was to review the predictors of PMRT in women with node-negative breast cancer and evaluate the overall recurrence rates. Methods: A retrospective chart review was completed. Women with node-negative breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy at a regional breast cancer center between January 1st,2011 and December 31st, 2017 were included. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment details and recurrence data were recorded. The primary outcome was recommendation of PMRT. Univariate analysis was completed and then a multivariable logistic regression was completed to determine independent predictors for PMRT. Results: Overall, 235 women with node-negative breast cancer underwent mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy during the study period. Forty-three (18.3%) patients were recommended to undergo PMRT, with 39 of the 43 patients completing the recommended treatment. PMRT was offered more often to younger women (p<0.001), women with multifocal/centric disease (p=0.002), large tumors (p<0.001), high grade tumors (p < 0.001), lymphovascular positive tumors (p=0.04) and estrogen-negative disease (p =0.017). On multivariable analysis, the odds of radiation recommendation were highest for patients with high grade disease (OR 5.81, 95%CI: 2.08 – 16.20) followed by multifocal/centric disease (OR 3.12, 95%CI: 1.26 – 7.70). There were no differences in overall recurrence between patients who underwent PMRT versus those who did not have PMRT (p = 0.31). Conclusions: A moderate percentage of node negative patients are offered PMRT. Independent predictors for recommendation of PMRT in node negative patients are: decreasing age, increasing tumor size, multifocal/centric disease and higher grade disease. Surgeons can use this information to counsel patients regarding the possible need for PMRT, especially in the setting of planned immediate reconstruction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document