scholarly journals Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Pathology and 2-Year Postsurgical Recurrence of Breast Cancer in Kenyan Women

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Nathan R. Brand ◽  
Ronald Wasike ◽  
Khalid Makhdomi ◽  
Rajendra Chauhan ◽  
Zahir Moloo ◽  
...  

Purpose The goal of this study was to describe the pathologic findings and early follow-up experience of patients who underwent a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) at Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) between 2008 and 2017. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of women with breast cancer who underwent an SLNB at AKUH between 2008 and 2017. The SLNB was performed on patients with stage I and stage II breast cancer, and identification of the sentinel lymph node was made by radioactive tracer, blue dye, or both, per availability and surgeon preference. Demographic, surgical, and pathologic data, including immunohistochemistry of the surgical sample for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, were abstracted from the patient records. Follow-up data were available for a subset of patients. Results Between 2008 and 2017, six surgeons performed SLNBs on 138 women, 129 of whom had complete records and were included in the study. Thirty-one of 129 (24%) had a positive SLNB, including 10 of 73 (14%) with stage I and 21 of 56 (38%) with stage II disease. Seventy-eight patients (60%) received systemic adjuvant chemotherapy and 79 (62%) received radiation therapy, and of the 102 patients who were estrogen receptor positive, 86 (85%) received endocrine therapy. Seventy-nine patients were observed for > 2 years, and, of these, four (5.1%) had a regional recurrence. Conclusion The SLNB positivity rates were similar to those of high-income country (HIC) cohorts. However, preliminary data suggest that recurrence rates are elevated at AKUH as compared with those of HIC cohorts, perhaps because of a lower use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy at AKUH compared with HIC cohorts or because of differences in the characteristics of the primary tumor in patients at AKUH as compared with those in HICs.

2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 558-563
Author(s):  
Kimito Yamada ◽  
Akihiko Ogata ◽  
Hiroshi Kaise ◽  
Miki Oda ◽  
Fuyou Kimura ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (10) ◽  
pp. 1127-1129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Dauphine ◽  
Denis Nemtsev ◽  
David Rosing ◽  
Hernan I. Vargas

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is routinely performed as an axillary staging procedure for breast cancer. Although the reported false-negative rate approaches 10 per cent, this does not always lead to axillary recurrence. We previously reported an axillary recurrence rate of 1 per cent at a median follow-up of 2 years. Our objective is to determine the rate of axillary recurrence with longer follow-up. A retrospective review of patients with invasive breast cancer and a negative SLNB treated between 2001 and 2005 was performed. Cases where neoadjuvant therapy was used or where isolated tumor cells (ITCs) were found were included, whereas those with fewer than 18 months of follow-up were excluded. One (0.7%) out of 139 patients had an axillary recurrence after a median follow-up of 52 months. No patient who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy or with ITCs had axillary recurrence. Twelve (8.6%) patients have died, with death attributed to breast cancer in three. Our study demonstrates that axillary recurrence after SLNB remains a rare event after a median follow-up of 52 months, despite including potentially higher risk scenarios such as where neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used and ITCs are found. Therefore, axillary lymph node dissection can safely be avoided in patients where SLNB is negative.


2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 555-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Al Nakib ◽  
Max Buttarelli ◽  
Laetitia Huiart ◽  
Marc Martino ◽  
Carole Tarpin ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 199 (4) ◽  
pp. 442-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsunobu Imasato ◽  
Kenzo Shimazu ◽  
Yasuhiro Tamaki ◽  
Tetsuya Taguchi ◽  
Yoshio Tanji ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sira Salinas Huertas ◽  
A. Luzardo-González ◽  
S. Vazquez-Gallego ◽  
Sonia Pernas ◽  
C. Falo ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: We aimed to investigate the incidence of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment, to analyze the risk factors involved, and to improve existing protocols for the prevention of lymphedema. Patients and methods: This was a prospective cohort study of 232 patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer at our institution between September 2013 and February 2018. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) were mandatory in this cohort. Lymphedema was diagnosed by circumferential measurements and truncated cone calculations. Patients and tumor characteristics, as well as local and systemic therapies, were analyzed as possible risk factors for lymphedema. Results: In total, 201 patients met the inclusion criteria and had a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 1–54 months). Most cases of lymphedema cases appeared in the first 2 years. 13.9% developed lymphedema: 31% after ALND and 4.6% after SLNB (p < 0.01), and 46.7% after mastectomy and 11.3% after breast-conserving surgery (p < 0.01). The lymphedema rate increased when axillary radiotherapy (RT) was added to radical surgery: 4.3% for SLNB alone, 6.7% for SLNB + RT, 17.6% for ALND alone, and 35.2% for ALND + RT (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, the only risk factors associated with the development of lymphedema were ALND and mastectomy, which had hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 7.28 (2.92–18.16) and 3.9 (1.60–9.49), respectively. Conclusions: The main risk factors for lymphedema were the most radical surgeries (ALND and mastectomy), while the risk associated with these appeared to be worsened by the addition of axillary radiotherapy. A follow-up protocol in patients with ALND for at least two years, where these risk factors are recognized, is necessary to guarantee a comprehensive control of lymphedema that provides early detection and treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document