scholarly journals Discordance in early breast cancer for tumour grade, Estrogen Receptor, Progesteron Receptors and Human Epidermal Receptor-2 status between core needle biopsy and surgical excisional primary tumour

The Breast ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 284-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronique Lorgis ◽  
Marie Paule Algros ◽  
Cristian Villanueva ◽  
Loic Chaigneau ◽  
Antoine Thierry-vuillemin ◽  
...  
BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeeyeon Lee ◽  
Eun Hye Lee ◽  
Ho Yong Park ◽  
Wan Wook Kim ◽  
Ryu Kyung Lee ◽  
...  

BMC Genomics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilbert Zwart ◽  
Rutger Koornstra ◽  
Jelle Wesseling ◽  
Emiel Rutgers ◽  
Sabine Linn ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Emma C. Dunne ◽  
Edel M. Quinn ◽  
Maurice Stokes ◽  
John M. Barry ◽  
Malcolm Kell ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION: Atypical intraductal epithelial proliferation (AIDEP) is a breast lesion categorised as “indeterminate” if identified on core needle biopsy (CNB). The rate at which these lesions are upgraded following diagnostic excision varies in the literature. Women diagnosed with AIDEP are thought to be at increased risk of breast cancer. Our aim was to identify the rate of upgrade to invasive or in situ carcinoma in a group of patients diagnosed with AIDEP on screening mammography and to quantify their risk of subsequent breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database containing all patients diagnosed with AIDEP on CNB between 2005 and 2012 in an Irish breast screening centre. Basic demographic data was collected along with details of the original CNB result, rate of upgrade to carcinoma and details of any subsequent cancer diagnoses. RESULTS: In total 113 patients were diagnosed with AIDEP on CNB during the study period. The upgrade rate on diagnostic excision was 28.3% (n = 32). 6.2% (n = 7) were upgraded to invasive cancer and 22.1% (n = 25) to DCIS. 81 patients were not upgraded on diagnostic excision and were offered 5 years of annual mammographic surveillance. 9.88% (8/81) of these patients went on to receive a subsequent diagnosis of malignancy. The mean time to diagnosis of these subsequent cancers was 65.41 months (range 20.18–145.21). CONCLUSION: Our data showing an upgrade rate of 28% to carcinoma reflects recently published data and we believe it supports the continued practice of excising AIDEP to exclude co-existing carcinoma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document