Aquacel® Ag dressing versus Acticoat™ dressing in partial thickness burns: A prospective, randomized, controlled study in 100 patients. Part 1: Burn wound healing

Burns ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 416-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jozef Verbelen ◽  
Henk Hoeksema ◽  
Alexander Heyneman ◽  
Ali Pirayesh ◽  
Stan Monstrey
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S199-S199
Author(s):  
Suzanne Mitchell ◽  
Dhaval Bhavsar ◽  
Jessica Reynolds ◽  
Jessica Jones ◽  
Julia M Pena

Abstract Introduction Accurate burn assessment is crucial to prescribing appropriate treatment and is dependent upon the experience of the provider and the timing of diagnosis relative to the burn injury evaluation. Differentiating between a deep partial thickness and full thickness burn may not be easily discernible. To augment the clinical diagnosis of burn depth, a laser doppler image measures the microvascular blood flow of injured tissue to predict burn wound healing. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical assessment of burn wounds by experienced burn providers compared to the laser doppler image assessment in predicting which burn wounds should heal spontaneously in 3 weeks. Methods A retrospective chart review from 2012–2016, included 54 subjects. The clinical assessment included a description of burn variables relevant to the determination of spontaneous burn wound healing (burn depth, total body surface area, mechanism of injury, anatomical location, clinical burn depth diagnosis, and laser doppler image). A chi-square analysis compared the clinical diagnosis and the laser doppler assessment of burn wound depth, as well as the correlation between clinical diagnosis versus laser doppler image in predicting spontaneous burn wound healing. Results Comparing partial thickness burn injuries, there were 38 clinically diagnosed partial thickness injuries (by experienced burn providers) and 38 partial thickness burn injures diagnosed via LDI. Deep partial thickness burn injuries were diagnosed clinically in 9 subjects, compared to 10 via LDI. Full thickness burn injuries were diagnosed clinically in 7 subjects and 6 via LDI. A chi-square test was performed to examine the relationship between clinical diagnosis of burn depth and laser doppler image. The relation between these variables was significant,X2= 26.884, p< .000. Comparing clinically diagnosed burn depth to LDI, each approach (clinical or LDI) diagnosed 42 subjects with partial thickness or deep partial thickness burn injuries and all healed spontaneously. Two of the clinically diagnosed full thickness burn injuries required skin grafting. Six patients were lost to follow-up (X2= 17.745, p < .001). Conclusions This study confirms there is no difference between an experienced burn provider’s clinical diagnosis of burn wound depth and prognosis for spontaneous healing compared to a laser doppler image prognosis of burn wound healing. Applicability of Research to Practice In an era of advanced technologies, expert clinical bedside assessment is the standard of care.


2005 ◽  
Vol 116 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 194 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Twomey ◽  
Daniel Caruso ◽  
Paul Silverstein ◽  
Jeff Antimarino ◽  
Greg Bauer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document