Trends of incidence and survival of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia between 1999 and 2014: A comparison between Swiss and American population-based cancer registries

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 51-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Benzarti ◽  
Michael Daskalakis ◽  
Anita Feller ◽  
Vera Ulrike Bacher ◽  
Annatina Schnegg-Kaufmann ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2784-2784
Author(s):  
Dan Zandberg ◽  
Ting-Ying Huang ◽  
Xuehua Ke ◽  
Maria R. Baer ◽  
Steven D. Gore ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2784 Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal stem cell disorder that displays features of both a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). Originally classified as an MDS subtype in the French-American-British (FAB) classification system, it was reclassified as an MDS/MPN in the World Health Organization (WHO) system. Based on SEER and NAACCR data, CMML is associated with shorter survival than MDS and MPN, but no other population-based data have been available to date. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) dataset linked to Medicare enrollment and claims data to compare patient demographics, baseline characteristics, treatments received, progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and survival between CMML and MDS. The sample included 792 CMML and 6,588 MDS patients diagnosed from 2001 through 2005. MDS cases were 34.6% low-risk [RA, RARS, RCMD, del (5q)], 13.7% high-risk (RAEB), 1.4% therapy-related and 50.4% not otherwise specified. CMML and MDS patients did not differ in age (peak proportion at 80–84 years in both) or race distribution (90% and 88% white non-Hispanic, respectively). Male predominance was greater in CMML than in MDS (59.2% vs. 53.8%; p =.004). Baseline renal disease was more common among CMML patients (13.0% vs. 7.4%; p <.0001), while CHF/ischemic heart disease (37.4% vs. 44.6%; p =.000) and liver disease (2.8% vs.4.3%; p=.041) were more common in MDS. There was no difference in the proportion with poor performance status, diagnosis of other cancers within 5 years of CMML/MDS diagnosis, health care use prior to diagnosis or median household income. More CMML than MDS patients received no treatment (25.25% vs. 15.7%; p <.0001). Among patients who were treated, fewer CMML patients received blood transfusions (59.5% vs. 70.4%; p <.0001), erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (46.3% vs. 62.4; p <.0001) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (7.32% vs. 16.9%; p <.0001), while more CMML patients were treated with cytarabine (2.02 vs. 0.87; p =.002), etoposide (1.01 vs. 0.36%; p = 0.009) and bone marrow transplantation (1.14% vs. 0.47%; p =.016). There was no difference in treatment with hypomethylating agents between CMML and MDS patients (5.81% vs. 7.64%; p =.064). A higher percentage of CMML patients progressed to AML (42.6% vs. 16.3%; p < .0001) and progression occurred earlier (median 8 vs. 33 weeks; p < .0001). CMML patients had a lower survival probability at 1 year (51% vs. 66%; p <.0001) and at 3 years (19% vs. 37%; p <.0001), and a shorter median survival (13.3 vs. 24 months; p <.0001). Survival remained significantly lower across gender, age and race groups. In this population-based study, we have demonstrated that CMML patients less frequently receive therapeutic interventions, in relation to MDS patients, but in fact have a higher rate of progression to AML, more rapid progression to AML and shorter survival. The percentages of patients receiving hypomethylating agents for both diseases was low in our dataset and has likely increased following FDA approval of azacitidine in 2004 and decitabine in 2006. Our data support early application of disease-modifying therapies in CMML, and also support the need for clinical trials focused on this disease entity. Disclosures: Gore: Celgene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Davidoff:Cellgene: Equity Ownership, Research Funding.


2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 1262-1266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gemma Osca-Gelis ◽  
Montserrat Puig-Vives ◽  
Marc Saez ◽  
David Gallardo ◽  
Francesc Solé ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4645-4645
Author(s):  
Avinash G Dinmohamed ◽  
Mirian Brink ◽  
Otto Visser ◽  
Pieter Sonneveld ◽  
Arjan A van de Loosdrecht ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare hematological malignancy with features of both myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms. Most data on CMML arrive from the few available clinical and epidemiological studies where CMML was often combined with MDS. So far, phase 3 clinical trials and large population-based studies specifically addressing CMML are lacking. We conducted a large nationwide population-based study to assess trends in incidence, primary treatment and survival among CMML patients in the Netherlands from 1989-2012. Methods We selected all patients diagnosed with CMML in 1989-2012 (N = 1,359; median age 75 years; age range 22-95 years; 63% males) from the nationwide population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Patients with juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia were excluded. Despite changes in classification, separate morphology codes for CMML were available in all editions of the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O; 9893, 9868 and 9945 in the first, second and third edition, respectively) and could therefore be identified in the NCR throughout the whole study period. The ICD-O does not have separate codes for CMML-1 or 2. Data on primary treatment, that is, no therapy or only supportive care (NT/SC), chemotherapy (CT) and CT followed by a stem cell transplantation (CT + SCT), were retrieved from the NCR. Patients were categorized into three calendar periods (1989-2000, 2001-2006 and 2007-2012) and four age groups (18-59, 60-69, 70-79 and ≥80 years), unless otherwise stated. Incidence rates were age-standardized to the European standard population and calculated per 100,000 person-years. Relative survival rates (RSRs) were computed as a measure of disease-specific survival. Results The overall age-standardized incidence rate (ASR) of CMML increased from 0.23 per 100,000 in 1989-2000, 0.31 in 2001-2006 to 0.38 in 2007-2012. The annual ASR became stable at around 0.4 per 100,000 since 2008 (Fig 1A). The proportion of patients diagnosed in individuals aged ≥70 years was 70%. The incidence of CMML was higher in men than in women, which was ascribed to the higher incidence among the 70-year-old men compared with the equivalent female group (Fig 1B). The primary treatment of CMML patients remained unchanged during the entire study period. In the overall series, 975 (72%), 365 (27%) and 19 (1%) CMML patients received NT/SC, CT and CT + SCT, respectively. The use of CT + SCT was mainly restricted to patients 18-59 (n = 13) and 60-69 (n = 6) years of age. Survival of CMML patients was poor and did not improve over time as the 5-year RSRs (with 95% confidence interval) were 16% (12%-20%), 20% (15%-25%) and 20% (15%-25%) in the three calendar periods, respectively. As shown in Figure 2, the overall 5-year RSRs for patients in the four age groups were 21% (13%-29%), 23% (18%-29%), 20% (16%-24%) and 12% (7%-18%), respectively. With the limitation of small numbers (n = 19), the overall 5- and 10-year RSRs were 29% (10%-52%) and 30% (10%-53%) for patients undergoing CT + SCT as primary treatment. In other words, the RSR reached a plateau after 5 years since diagnosis. In the most recent period, the 5-year RSR was 73% (25%-95%) for patients undergoing CT + SCT (n = 7). Conclusions In this first large population-based study including almost 1400 CMML patients, we found that the incidence of CMML increased over time until the year 2007. This rise is probably explained by improved case ascertainment and augmented disease awareness, rather than by changes in etiologic factors. Primary treatment remained conservative throughout the study period as treatment options for CMML, which primarily affects the elderly, are very limited. As a consequence, relative survival remained poor and essentially unchanged in both younger and older patients over the past two decades. Therefore, CMML-specific prognostic models should be applied in the diagnostic work-up to evaluate prognosis and plan risk-adapted treatment, and assist in designing clinical trials that specifically assess therapeutic options in CMML patients in order to improve their survival. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document