Individualizing dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration based on bleeding risk, ischemic risk, or both: An analysis from the DAPT Study

Author(s):  
Nino Mihatov ◽  
Eric A. Secemsky ◽  
Dean J. Kereiakes ◽  
P. Gabriel Steg ◽  
Donald E. Cutlip ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Cavallari ◽  
E Sagazio ◽  
E Antonucci ◽  
P Calabro' ◽  
F Gragnano ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Diabetes is a known risk factor for a first or recurrent cardiovascular event, however, its association with an increased risk of bleeding is controversial. To date, no study has explored the prognostic weight of insulin therapy in the setting of ACS. Purpose To investigate the differential role of insulin versus no insulin therapy on ischemic and bleeding risks in patients with diabetes and ACS. Methods START-ANTIPLATELET is a prospective, real-world multicenter registry including consecutive patients admitted for ACS. For the purpose of this analysis, patients were stratified according to diabetes status and insulin therapy. We compared 1-year rates of major adverse cardiovascular events, a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke, and of any bleeding, according to diabetes status (no diabetes, diabetes not on insulin therapy, diabetes on insulin therapy). In addition, we evaluated the net clinical benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy with the newer P2Y12 inhibitors (ticagrelor or prasugrel) vs dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel according to diabetes status. Results In an overall population of 907 patients, 198 had diabetes, 10.6% of whom were on insulin. From non-diabetic patients to diabetic patients not on insulin and diabetic patients on insulin there was a stepwise decrease of MACE-free survival (log-rank p 0.039) with incidence of events at 1 year being 3.8%, 6.8% (adjusted p vs no diabetes 0.49) and 12.5% (adjusted p vs no diabetes 0.047), respectively (Figure, panel A). The rates of any bleeding were higher in patients on insulin (20.8% vs 8.8% in those without diabetes and 5.8% in diabetic patients not receiving insulin; log-rank p 0.028; Figure, panel B). Multivariable analysis demonstrated an almost 5-fold increase of any bleeding in diabetic patients with vs without insulin (OR 4.98, 95% CI 1.46–16.92; p=0.010). In the overall population, the incidence of the net composite endpoint including MACE or major bleeding with the use of ticagrelor/prasugrel on top of aspirin was significantly lower compared to use of clopidogrel (4.7% vs 8.4%; OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30–0.94, p=0.031). This net clinical benefit in patients receiving a newer P2Y12 inhibitor was regardless of the diabetes status (p for interaction 0.48). Conclusions In this cohort of ACS patients, the presence of diabetes stratified by insulin therapy was associated with a graded increase in the 1-year rates of MACE. Conversely, insulin therapy significantly contributed to the overall increase of bleeding risk in diabetes. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2019 ◽  
Vol 119 (09) ◽  
pp. 1539-1545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie Schüpke ◽  
Ralph Hein-Rothweiler ◽  
Katharina Mayer ◽  
Marion Janisch ◽  
Dirk Sibbing ◽  
...  

AbstractDespite dual antiplatelet therapy patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) continue to experience periprocedural ischemic events. In addition, all currently used antithrombotic drugs increase the bleeding risk. Thus, there is an unmet clinical need for antithrombotic strategies with improved efficacy and no increase in bleeding. Revacept is a novel, lesion-directed antithrombotic drug that does not interfere with the function of circulating platelets. This dimeric fusion protein of the extracellular domain of glycoprotein VI (the major platelet collagen receptor) and the human Fc-fragment inhibits collagen-mediated platelet adhesion and subsequent aggregation at the site of vascular injury. The randomized, double-blinded, phase II ISAR-PLASTER trial is based on extensive preclinical evaluation of Revacept and a favorable first-in-man trial. A total of 332 patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing elective PCI will be randomized to either Revacept 160 mg, Revacept 80 mg, or placebo administered as single intravenous infusion directly before the intervention, on top of standard dual antiplatelet therapy and either heparin or bivalirudin, based on local practice and current guidelines. The primary endpoint is the composite of death or myocardial injury (defined as increase in high sensitivity troponin T ≥ 5 times the upper limit of normal) at 48 hours. The safety endpoint is bleeding of class 2 or higher according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium at 30 days. This phase II randomized, double blind trial will assess for the first time the efficacy and safety of Revacept—a lesion-directed inhibitor of platelet adhesion—in patients undergoing elective PCI.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 749-752
Author(s):  
Alexandru Burlacu ◽  
Adrian Covic

Abstract In this issue of Clinical Kidney Journal, Park et al. presents the results of a nationwide population-based trial that included >5000 dialysis patients receiving a drug-eluting stent (DES). The main objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The primary outcome was a composite of mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization and stroke, significantly lowered by a longer DAPT regimen at 12, 15 and 18 months, respectively. Longer DAPT tended to be correlated with higher bleeding events at all landmarks, with no statistical significance. An important element was that almost 75% of the index events were acute coronary syndromes. This study presents the first solid evidence for a significant benefit of prolonged DAPT in dialysis patients receiving a DES. We believe that end-stage renal disease is still in the middle of a rope game, being pulled to one side or another by other features, inclining towards a higher bleeding risk or towards higher ischaemic risk. The acute versus elective presentation seems to weigh in choosing the antiplatelet regimen. The ‘one-size-fits-all strategy’ is not suitable for this particular group. Probably in the future, practitioners will be provided with decision pathways generated by artificial intelligence algorithms yielding ‘truly individualized’ DAPT protocols for every single patient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document