scholarly journals Hierarchical prediction of soil water content time series

CATENA ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 209 ◽  
pp. 105841
Author(s):  
Feike J. Leij ◽  
Jacob H. Dane ◽  
Antonella Sciortino
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Ali Rahmat ◽  
Afandi ◽  
Tumiar K Manik ◽  
Priyo Cahyono

Irigasi pada tanaman nanas sangat penting karena mempengaruhi pertumbuhan dan produksi namun biayanya sangat mahal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh irigasi dan mulsa organik pada kadar air tanah dan pertumbuhan nanas. Penelitian ini dilakukan menggunakan perlakuan faktorial (5 x 2) dalam rancangan acak kelompok dengan tiga ulangan. Faktor pertama adalah panjang waktu irigasi (I), yang terdiri dari 5 waktu yaitu tanpa irigasi (I0), irigasi 1 bulan (I1), irigasi 2 bulan (I2), irigasi 3 bulan (I3), dan irigasi 4 bulan (I4). Faktor kedua adalah dosis kulit singkong (mulsa organik) terdiri dari 2 level 0 ton/ha (M0) dan 50 ton/ha (M1). Kadar air tanah diukur menggunakan Diviner 2000. Data kadar air tanah dianalisis dengan time series. Pertumbuhan tanaman dianalisis keragamannya dan diuji BNT pada taraf 5 %. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan kulit singkong 50 ton/ha pada umumnya hanya bertahan 2,5 bulan untuk mempertahankan kadar air. Mulsa kulit singkong lebih berperan ketika tanah mulai mengering. Pemberian mulsa kulit singkong berpengaruh terhadap tinggi dan berat basah tanaman sedangkan perlakuan, irigasi secara terpisah hanya berpengaruh terhadap berat basah tanaman. Interaksi antara irigasi dan kulit singkong berpengaruh terhadap berat basah tanaman. Meskipun kadar air tanah tersedia cukup saat memasuki musim hujan, namun tidak efektif dalam memulihkan keragaan tanaman nanas. Pemulihan terjadi setelah memasuk musim hujan dimana kadar air tanah tinggi.


2012 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 105-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basem Aljoumani ◽  
Jose A. Sànchez-Espigares ◽  
Nuria Cañameras ◽  
Ramon Josa ◽  
Joaquim Monserrat

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 9813-9864 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Heidbüchel ◽  
A. Güntner ◽  
T. Blume

Abstract. Cosmic ray neutron sensors (CRS) are a promising technique to measure soil moisture at intermediate scales. To convert neutron counts to average volumetric soil water content a simple calibration function can be used (the N0-calibration of Desilets et al., 2010). This calibration function is based on soil water content derived directly from soil samples taken within the footprint of the sensor. We installed a CRS in a mixed forest in the lowlands of north-eastern Germany and calibrated it 10 times throughout one calendar year. Each calibration with the N0-calibration function resulted in a different CRS soil moisture time series, with deviations of up to 0.12 m3 m-3 for individual values of soil water content. Also, many of the calibration efforts resulted in time series that could not be matched with independent in situ measurements of soil water content. We therefore suggest a new calibration function with a different shape that can vary from one location to another. A two-point calibration proved to be adequate to correctly define the shape of the new calibration function if the calibration points were taken during both dry and wet conditions covering at least 50 % of the total range of soil moisture. The best results were obtained when the soil samples used for calibration were linearly weighted as a function of depth in the soil profile and non-linearly weighted as a function of distance from the CRS, and when the depth-specific amount of soil organic matter and lattice water content was explicitly considered. The annual cycle of tree foliation was found to be a negligible factor for calibration because the variable hydrogen mass in the leaves was small compared to the hydrogen mass changes by soil moisture variations. Finally, we provide a best practice calibration guide for CRS in forested environments.


2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 1269-1288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo Heidbüchel ◽  
Andreas Güntner ◽  
Theresa Blume

Abstract. Measuring soil moisture with cosmic-ray neutrons is a promising technique for intermediate spatial scales. To convert neutron counts to average volumetric soil water content a simple calibration function can be used (the N0-calibration of Desilets et al., 2010). The calibration is based on soil water content derived directly from soil samples taken within the footprint of the sensor. We installed a cosmic-ray neutron sensor (CRS) in a mixed forest in the lowlands of north-eastern Germany and calibrated it 10 times throughout one calendar year. Each calibration with the N0-calibration function resulted in a different CRS soil moisture time series, with deviations of up to 0.1 m3 m−3 (24 % of the total range) for individual values of soil water content. Also, many of the calibration efforts resulted in time series that could not be matched with independent in situ measurements of soil water content. We therefore suggest a modified calibration function with a different shape that can vary from one location to another. A two-point calibration was found to effectively define the shape of the modified calibration function if the calibration points were taken during both dry and wet conditions spanning at least half of the total range of soil moisture. The best results were obtained when the soil samples used for calibration were linearly weighted as a function of depth in the soil profile and nonlinearly weighted as a function of distance from the CRS, and when the depth-specific amount of soil organic matter and lattice water content was explicitly considered. The annual cycle of tree foliation was found to be a negligible factor for calibration because the variable hydrogen mass in the leaves was small compared to the hydrogen mass changes by soil moisture variations. As a final point, we provide a calibration guide for a CRS in forested environments.


2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 409-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Guderle ◽  
A. Hildebrandt

Abstract. Understanding the role of plants in soil water relations, and thus ecosystem functioning, requires information about root water uptake. We evaluated four different complex water balance methods to estimate sink term patterns and evapotranspiration directly from soil moisture measurements. We tested four methods. The first two take the difference between two measurement intervals as evapotranspiration, thus neglecting vertical flow. The third uses regression on the soil water content time series and differences between day and night to account for vertical flow. The fourth accounts for vertical flow using a numerical model and iteratively solves for the sink term. None of these methods requires any a priori information of root distribution parameters or evapotranspiration, which is an advantage compared to common root water uptake models. To test the methods, a synthetic experiment with numerical simulations for a grassland ecosystem was conducted. Additionally, the time series were perturbed to simulate common sensor errors, like those due to measurement precision and inaccurate sensor calibration. We tested each method for a range of measurement frequencies and applied performance criteria to evaluate the suitability of each method. In general, we show that methods accounting for vertical flow predict evapotranspiration and the sink term distribution more accurately than the simpler approaches. Under consideration of possible measurement uncertainties, the method based on regression and differentiating between day and night cycles leads to the best and most robust estimation of sink term patterns. It is thus an alternative to more complex inverse numerical methods. This study demonstrates that highly resolved (temporally and spatially) soil water content measurements may be used to estimate the sink term profiles when the appropriate approach is used.


1992 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 2437-2446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc B. Parlange ◽  
Gabriel G. Katul ◽  
Richard H. Cuenca ◽  
M. Levent Kavvas ◽  
Donald R. Nielsen ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
O Wendroth ◽  
H Rogasik ◽  
S Koszinski ◽  
C.J Ritsema ◽  
L.W Dekker ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document