Determination of the anaerobic threshold and maximal lactate steady state speed in equines using the lactate minimum speed protocol

Author(s):  
Fernando José Gondim ◽  
Cláudio César Zoppi ◽  
Lúcia Pereira-da-Silva ◽  
Denise Vaz de Macedo
Author(s):  
O.A.B. Soares ◽  
G.C. Ferraz ◽  
C.B. Martins ◽  
D.P.M. Dias ◽  
J.C. Lacerda-Neto ◽  
...  

The anaerobic threshold is a physiologic event studied in various species. There are various methods for its assessment, recognized in the human and equine exercise physiology literature, several of these involving the relationship between blood lactate concentration (LAC) and exercise load, measured in a standardized exercise test. The aim of this study was to compare four of these methods: V2, V4, individual anaerobic threshold (IAT) and lactate minimum speed (LMS) with the method recognized as the gold standard for the assessment of anaerobic threshold, maximal lactate steady-state (MLSS). The five tests were carried out in thirteen trained Arabian horses, in which velocities and associated LAC could be measured. The mean velocities and the LAC associated with the anaerobic threshold for the five methods were respectively: V2 = 9.67±0.54; V4 = 10.98±0.47; V IAT = 9.81±0.72; V LMS = 7.50±0.57 and V MLSS = 6.14±0.45m.s-1 and LAC IAT = 2.17±0.93; LAC LMS = 1.17±0.62 and LAC MLSS = 0.84±0.21mmol.L-1. None of the velocities were statistically equivalent to V MLSS (P<0.05). V2, V4 and V LMS showed a good correlation with V MLSS , respectively: r = 0.74; r = 0.78 and r = 0.83, and V IAT did not significantly correlate with V MLSS. Concordance between the protocols was relatively poor, i.e., 3.28±1.00, 4.84±0.30 and 1.43±0.32m.s-1 in terms of bias and 95% agreement limits for V2, V4 and LMS methods when compared to MLSS. Only LAC LMS did not differ statistically from LAC MLSS. Various authors have reported the possibility of the assessment of anaerobic threshold using rapid protocols such as V4 and LMS for humans and horses. This study corroborates the use of these tests, but reveals that adjustments in the protocols are necessary to obtain a better concordance between the tests and the MLSS.


2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.R. Beck ◽  
G. Gomes de Araujo ◽  
C.A. Gobatto

The lactate minimum test (LMT) is a useful protocol for determining the intensity corresponding to the maximal lactate steady state. Nevertheless, different methods to determine LMT variables are found in the literature. The aim of this study was to analyse three different methods for determining the effort intensity (LMTi) and lactataemia (LMTLAC) corresponding to LMT. We subjected seventeen rats to LMT in a swimming ergometer, following three steps: (1) acidosis induction phase; (2) recovery of nine minutes; and (3) incremental swimming intensity phase. We determined the LMTi and LMTLAC using three methods: visual inspection (VI - non-mathematic), second order polynomial function (fPOLY - mathematic) and spline function (fSPL - mathematic). Results showed no significant differences between the LMTi or LMTLAC values determined using VI (5.32+0.50% bw and 5.62+0.78 mM, respectively), fPOLY (5.31+0.53% bw and 5.64+0.72 mM, respectively) and fSPL (5.32+0.54% bw and 5.59+0.76 mM, respectively). We found significant correlations between the three methods (P<0.05). We concluded that the determination of the intensity and lactataemia corresponding to LMT are not influenced by mathematic or non-mathematic methods in swimming sedentary rats.


2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
MCPC Miranda ◽  
A Queiroz-Neto ◽  
JR Silva-Júnior ◽  
MC Pereira ◽  
OAB Soares ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (03) ◽  
pp. 214-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Almeida ◽  
B. Petriz ◽  
C.P. Gomes ◽  
L.A. Rocha ◽  
R. Pereira ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 1073-1080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emerson Pardono ◽  
Rafael da Costa Sotero ◽  
Wolysson Hiyane ◽  
Marcio Rabelo Mota ◽  
Carmen Silvia Grubert Campbell ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 68 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. G. Sim??es ◽  
C. S.G. Campbell ◽  
E. Kokubun ◽  
B. S. Denadai ◽  
V. Baldissera

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
João P. Loures ◽  
Karim Chamari ◽  
Eliel C. Ferreira ◽  
Eduardo Z. Campos ◽  
Alessandro M. Zagatto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document