scholarly journals Early screening biomarker HbA1c and Hematocrit for gestational diabetes mellitus

2022 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 100945
Author(s):  
Saswati Tripathy ◽  
Anuradha Murugesan ◽  
Kasthuri Natarajan ◽  
Balaji Ramraj ◽  
Satyajit Mohapatra
2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 609-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Fatima A Ferreira ◽  
Juliana C Rezende ◽  
Eirini Vaikousi ◽  
Ranjit Akolekar ◽  
Kypros H Nicolaides

BACKGROUND Visfatin and adiponectin are produced by adipose tissue and have opposite effects on insulin resistance. Circulating concentrations of these biomarkers are altered in type 2 diabetes mellitus. We sought to examine the potential value of maternal serum visfatin and adiponectin concentrations in early pregnancy as potential biomarkers in the prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS This work was a case-control study of 100 women who developed GDM and 300 nondiabetic controls. Maternal serum visfatin and adiponectin were measured between 11 and 13 weeks of gestation. Regression analysis in the nondiabetic group was performed to examine the maternal characteristics affecting the serum concentrations of visfatin and adiponectin. Likelihood ratios for GDM were calculated for visfatin and adiponectin, and performance of screening was assessed by using ROC curve analysis. RESULTS In the GDM group compared with the nondiabetic group, the median maternal serum visfatin concentration was increased (1.34 multiples of the median [MoM], interquartile range [IQR] 0.70–2.87, vs 1.00 MoM, IQR: 0.53–1.92; P = 0.004) and serum adiponectin was decreased (0.66 MoM, IQR 0.50–0.92, vs 1.01, IQR 0.70–1.29; P < 0.0001). In screening for GDM by a combination of maternal factors and serum adiponectin and visfatin, the estimated detection rate was 68.0% (95% CI 58.3–76.3%), at a false-positive rate of 10%. CONCLUSIONS At 11–13 weeks in pregnancies that develop GDM, the serum concentration of adiponectin is decreased and visfatin is increased, and these biomarkers can be combined with maternal factors to provide effective early screening for GDM.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-223
Author(s):  
Ali Reza Norouzi ◽  
Mahsa Siavashi ◽  
Fatemeh Norouzi ◽  
Maryam Talayeh ◽  
Somayyeh Noei Teymoordash ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Paola Quaresima ◽  
Federica Visconti ◽  
Eusebio Chiefari ◽  
Maria Mirabelli ◽  
Massimo Borelli ◽  
...  

Background. Screening strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) earlier than 24-28 weeks of gestation should be considered to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes. Nonetheless, there is uncertainty about which women would benefit most from early screening and which screening strategies should be offered to women with GDM. The Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS) recommendations on selective screening for GDM at 16-18 weeks of gestation are effective in preventing fetal macrosomia in high-risk (HR) women, but the appropriateness of timing and effectiveness of these recommendations in medium- (MR) and low-risk (LR) women are still controversial. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively enrolled 769 consecutive singleton pregnant women who underwent both anomaly scan at 19-21 weeks of gestation and screening for GDM at 16-18 and/or 24-28 weeks of gestation, in agreement with the NHS recommendations and risk stratification criteria. Comparison of maternal characteristics, fetal biometric parameters at anomaly scan (head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC), femur length (FL), estimated fetal weight (EFW)), and neonatal birth weight (BW) percentile among risk groups was examined. Results. 219 (28.5%) women were diagnosed with GDM, while 550 (71.5%) were normal glucose-tolerant women. Out of 164 HR women, only 62 (37.8%) underwent the recommended early screening for GDM at 16-18 weeks of gestation. AC and EFW percentiles, as well as neonates’ BW percentiles, were significantly higher in HR women diagnosed with GDM at 24-28 weeks of gestation with respect to normal glucose-tolerant women, as well as MR and LR women who tested positive for GDM. Comparative analysis between MR and LR women with GDM and women with normal glucose tolerance revealed significant differences in both AC and EFW percentiles (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in neonatal BW percentiles. Conclusion. In MR and LR women with GDM, a mild acceleration of fetal growth can be detected at the time of anomaly scan. However, in these at-risk categories, the NHS recommendations for screening and treatment of GDM at 24-28 weeks of gestation are still effective in normalizing BW and preventing fetal macrosomia, thus supporting a risk factor-based selective screening program for GDM.


Author(s):  
Shaiesta Amreen ◽  
Anjali Suneel ◽  
Ananya Shetty ◽  
Akhila Vasudeva ◽  
Pratap Kumar

Background: GDM cases go unidentified with inadequate screening methods in first trimester which in turn increases the maternal and neonatal morbidity which is preventable. The purpose of the study was to find out a cut off level for HbA1c and RBS at first trimester for screening Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Methods: Observational study on pregnant women in a tertiary care teaching institution. Early screening with HbA1c and RBS at booking visit and followed up to second trimester GTT at 24-28 weeks. Pregnant women were divided into 2 groups based on GTT results. Pregnant women with overt diabetes and multiple pregnancy were not included in the study.Results: Out of the 151 subjects, 76 cases were diagnosed with GDM while the other 75 were found to be non-GDM by following the 75g GTT approved by IADPSG. According to our study optimal cut-off for HbA1C was found to be 5.496±0.48 %, as it gives a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 55.3%. Optimal cut-off for RBS was found to be 112±0.77 mg/dl, as it gives a sensitivity of 35.55 and specificity of 94.7%.Conclusions: Glyco Hb A1c and RBS can be used as screening tool for the diagnosis of GDM.  The likelihood of having GDM at a cutoff of Glyco HbA1c 5.5% is 1.8 times and RBS level 112mg/dl is 7 times in pregnant women.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1772
Author(s):  
Ahmad Najmi ◽  
Shubham Atal ◽  
Balakrishnan Sadasivam ◽  
Pooja Singh ◽  
Avik Ray

2020 ◽  
Vol 222 (1) ◽  
pp. S340-S341
Author(s):  
Andrew Haddad ◽  
Priyanka Tripuraneni ◽  
Neggin Mokhtari ◽  
Melissa Fries ◽  
Sara Iqbal

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document