scholarly journals Personality differences as predictors of action-goal relationships in work-email activity

2020 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. 67-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Russell ◽  
Stephen A. Woods
2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. F. Marino ◽  
A. M. Borghi ◽  
L. Riggio
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin K. Gundersen ◽  
Melody C. Brown ◽  
Parneet Bhathal ◽  
Sean Kennedy

Author(s):  
Peter M. Todd ◽  
Gerd Gigerenzer

The study of situations involves asking how people behave in particular environmental settings, often in terms of their individual personality differences. The ecological rationality research program explains people’s behavior in terms of the specific decision-making tools they select and use from their mind’s adaptive toolbox when faced with specific types of environment structure. These two approaches can be integrated to provide a more precise mapping from features of situation structure to decision heuristics used and behavioral outcomes. This chapter presents three examples illustrating research on ecological rationality and its foundations, along with initial directions for incorporating it into an integrated situation theory.


1987 ◽  
Vol 60 (3_part_2) ◽  
pp. 1247-1254
Author(s):  
Ronald R. Holden ◽  
John R. Reddon

This study examined personality differences in participants from a university subject pool as a function of the time of participation during the academic term and year. For 150 introductory psychology students with required participation in a subject pool, significant associations were found between time of participation and specific personality variables as measured by Jackson's Personality Research Form. Significant temporal associations with more general personality modal profiles were also obtained. Investigators using university subject pools are warned that these temporal variations in personality may represent possible confounds in research.


1977 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 767-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M. Burley ◽  
John McGuinness

The study examined the effects of social intelligence on the Milgram (1963) paradigm. 24 male subjects were commanded by the experimenter to administer electric shocks (simulated to appear real) to a confederate. Social intelligence as measured significantly mediated the degree to which subjects were prepared to obey the experimenter's commands and inflict suffering on another. The finding was interpreted as suggesting that broader personality differences relating to obedience-disobedience and altruistic acts, such as alleviating the plight of a suffering victim, are more likely to be found in the realm of cognitive abilities than with traditional temperament traits.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document