scholarly journals Correction to Affiliation in: Morbid Obesity and Mortality in Patients With VTE: Findings From Real-Life Clinical Practice

CHEST Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 159 (3) ◽  
pp. 1310
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.K Gitt ◽  
M Horack ◽  
D Lautsch ◽  
R Zahn ◽  
J Ferrieres

Abstract Background The 2019 ESC guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia even further lowered the LDL-C-target values for the very high-risk population from <70mg/dl to <55mg/dl. Population based studies already had shown that the previous target was difficult to reach. It is yet unclear how many patients in clinical practice might be treated to the new target. Methods The Dyslipidemia International Study (DYSIS II) prospectively collected data of patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS) (all on statins) in 18 countries in Europe, the Middle East, South- and East Asia to document patient characteristics, medication and a current lipid profile from 2012 to 2014 under real life conditions in physicians' offices and hospitals. We took these real-life lipid profiles and data on the kind/dose of used statins to estimate how treatment escalation such as changing statin treatment to a high dose (atorvastatin ≥40mg / rosuvastatin≥20mg), adding ezetimibe and adding a PCSK9-inhibitor might help to bring LDL-C-levels to the recommended <55mg/dl target. Results A total of 7,865 patients were enrolled into DYSIS II, 6,794 had CCS and 1,071 ACS. Under the documented statin treatment in DYSIS only 12.7% of patients reached an LDL-C <55mg/dl. Putting all patients on high dose statins in combination with ezetimibe, 64.1% would reach the target. If PCSK9-inhibitors would be used in the remaining patients not at goal a total of 94.0% would match the goal. Conclusion Our analysis indicates that in real life practice the use available lipid-lowering medications would substantially increase the percentage of CCS- and ACS-patients reaching the newly recommended 2019 ESC guideline LDL-C-target of <55 mg/dl from less than 20% to more than 90% of the population. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): MSD


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A34.2-A34
Author(s):  
M Cárdenas ◽  
P Font ◽  
S De la Fuente ◽  
MC Castro-Villegas ◽  
M Romero-Gómez ◽  
...  

Toxicon ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 190 ◽  
pp. S48
Author(s):  
Joana Martins ◽  
José Mesquita ◽  
Margarida Freitas ◽  
Susana Rosa ◽  
Bruno Guimarães ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Ana Isabel Enríquez-Rodríguez ◽  
Tamara Hermida Valverde ◽  
Pedro Romero Álvarez ◽  
Francisco Julián López-González ◽  
Jose Antonio Gullón Blanco ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carsten Vogt

AbstractThe uptake of the QbTest in clinical practice is increasing and has recently been supported by research evidence proposing its effectiveness in relation to clinical decision-making. However, the exact underlying process leading to this clinical benefit is currently not well established and requires further clarification. For the clinician, certain challenges arise when adding the QbTest as a novel method to standard clinical practice, such as having the skills required to interpret neuropsychological test information and assess for diagnostically relevant neurocognitive domains that are related to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), or how neurocognitive domains express themselves within the behavioral classifications of ADHD and how the quantitative measurement of activity in a laboratory setting compares with real-life (ecological validity) situations as well as the impact of comorbidity on test results. This article aims to address these clinical conundrums in aid of developing a consistent approach and future guidelines in clinical practice.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. e160
Author(s):  
Dominique Stephan ◽  
Elena-Mihaela Cordeanu ◽  
Sébastien Gaertner

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renaud Hage ◽  
Christine Detrembleur ◽  
Frédéric Dierick ◽  
Laurent Pitance ◽  
Laurent Jojczyk ◽  
...  

Various noninvasive measurement devices can be used to assess cervical motion. Size, complexity and cost of gold-standard systems make them not suited in clinical practice, and actually difficult to use outside dedicated laboratory. Nowadays, ultra-low-cost inertial measurement units are available but without any packaging nor user-friendly interface. DYSKIMOT is a home- designed, small-sized, motion sensor based on the latter technology, aiming at being used by clinicians in “real-life situations”. In the present study. DYSKIMOT was compared with a gold- standard optoelectronic system (Elite). Our goal was to evaluate the accuracy of DYSKIMOT in assessing the kinematics in fast head rotations. Kinematics was simultaneously recorded by the DYSKIMOT and Elite systems during the execution of the DidRen Laser test and performed by 15 participants and 9 patients. Kinematic variables were computed from the position, speed and acceleration time series. Two-way ANOVA, Passing-Bablok regressions and Dynamic Time Warping analysis showed good to excellent agreement between Elite and DYSKIMOT, both at the qualitative level of the time series shape and at the quantitative level of peculiar kinematical events’ measured values. In conclusion, DYSKIMOT sensor is as relevant as a gold-standard system to assess kinematical features during fast head rotations in participants and patients, demonstrating its usefulness in clinical practice or research in ecological environment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document