scholarly journals BLAME IT ON THE PRONE: COVID-19-ASSOCIATED STEVEN-JOHNSON SYNDROME AS A MIMIC OF PRONE POSITION PRESSURE INJURY

CHEST Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (4) ◽  
pp. A755
Author(s):  
Mehek Rahim ◽  
Sung Hong ◽  
Karan Omidvari
2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryota Niikura ◽  
Takako Serizawa ◽  
Atsuo Yamada ◽  
Shuntaro Yoshida ◽  
Mariko Tanaka ◽  
...  

The number of cancer patients undergoing dialysis has been increasing, and the number of these patients on chemotherapy is also increasing. Imatinib is an effective and safe therapy for KIT-positive gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), but the efficacy and safety of imatinib in dialysis patients remain unclear. Because clinical trials have not been conducted in this population, more investigations are required. We report on a 75-year-old Japanese man undergoing dialysis who presented with massive tarry stool from a duodenal GIST. The duodenal GIST was 14 cm in diameter with multiple liver and bone metastases. The patient underwent an urgent pancreaticoduodenectomy to achieve hemostasis. After surgery, he was administered imatinib 400 mg/day. No severe adverse event including myelosuppression, congestive heart failure, liver functional impairment, intestinal pneumonia, or Steven-Johnson syndrome occurred, and the liver metastasis remained stable for 4 months. During chemotherapy, hemodialysis continued three times per week without adverse events. We suggest that regular-dose imatinib is an effective and safe treatment in patients with GIST undergoing dialysis. In addition, we present a literature review of the effectiveness and safety of imatinib treatment in dialysis patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (suppl 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinicius Batista Santos ◽  
Daniele Cristina Bosco Aprile ◽  
Camila Takáo Lopes ◽  
Juliana de Lima Lopes ◽  
Mônica Antar Gamba ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: to perform the content and face validation of a checklist and a banner on pressure injury prevention in patients in prone position. Method: this is a methodological study of content and face validation with 26 nurses with specialization. Professionals assessed the checklist and the banner in relation to clarity, theoretical relevance, practical relevance, relation of the figures to the text and font size. The Content Validity Index was calculated for each item, considering one with a value equal to or greater than 0.8 as valid. Results: all the actions described in the checklist and in the banner had a Content Validity Index greater than 0.80, with standardization of verbal time and esthetic adjustments in the banner’s layout, as suggested. Conclusions: the checklist and the banner were validated and can be used in clinical practice to facilitate pressure injury preventions in patients in prone position.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document