Ultra high efficiency/low pressure supercritical fluid chromatography with superficially porous particles for triglyceride separation

2014 ◽  
Vol 1327 ◽  
pp. 141-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Lesellier ◽  
A. Latos ◽  
A. Lopes de Oliveira
2017 ◽  
Vol 963 ◽  
pp. 164-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darshan C. Patel ◽  
Zachary S. Breitbach ◽  
JeongJae Yu ◽  
Kate A. Nguyen ◽  
Daniel W. Armstrong

2020 ◽  
Vol 1612 ◽  
pp. 460687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denisa Folprechtová ◽  
Oleksandr Kozlov ◽  
Daniel W. Armstrong ◽  
Martin G. Schmid ◽  
Květa Kalíková ◽  
...  

Molecules ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 2709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Ismail ◽  
Simona Felletti ◽  
Chiara Luca ◽  
Luisa Pasti ◽  
Nicola Marchetti ◽  
...  

Until less than 10 years ago, chiral separations were carried out with columns packed with 5 or 3 μ m fully porous particles (FPPs). Times to resolve enantiomeric mixtures were easily larger than 30 min, or so. Pushed especially by stringent requirements from medicinal and pharmaceutical industries, during the last years the field of chiral separations by liquid chromatography has undergone what can be defined a “true revolution”. With the purpose of developing ever faster and efficient method of separations, indeed, very efficient particle formats, such as superficially porous particles (SPPs) or


2014 ◽  
Vol 1360 ◽  
pp. 275-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Grand-Guillaume Perrenoud ◽  
William P. Farrell ◽  
Christine M. Aurigemma ◽  
Nicole C. Aurigemma ◽  
Szabolcs Fekete ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. David Pinkston

Mobile phases in supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) have low viscosities and high diffusion coefficients with respect to those of traditional high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). These properties allow higher mobile phase flow rates and/or longer columns in SFC, resulting in rapid analyses and high efficiency separations. In addition, chiral SFC is becoming especially popular. Mass spectrometry (MS) is arguably the most popular “informative” detector for chromatographic separations. Most SFC/MS is performed with atmospheric pressure ionization (API) sources. Unlike LC/MS, the interface between the SFC column and the API source must allow control of the downstream (post-column) pressure while also providing good chromatographic fidelity. Here, we compare and contrast the popular interfacing approaches. Some are simple, such as direct effluent introduction with no active back pressure regulator (BPR) in high-speed bioanalytical applications. The pressure-regulating fluid interface is more versatile and provides excellent chromatographic fidelity, but is less user friendly. The pre-BPR-split interface and an interface which provides total flow introduction with a mechanical BPR are good compromises between user friendliness and performance and have become the most popular among practitioners. Applications of SFC/MS using these various interfaces are also discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document