scholarly journals The role of trochanteric flip osteotomy in fixation of certain acetabular fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Gupta ◽  
Jagdeep Singh ◽  
Jagandeep Singh Virk
Author(s):  
Sajid Ansari ◽  
Sitanshu Barik ◽  
Sanny Kumar Singh ◽  
Bhaskar Sarkar ◽  
Tarun Goyal ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-277
Author(s):  
Qazi Waris Manzoor ◽  
Asif Sultan ◽  
Bashir Ahmed Mir

Background. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach is recommended in the majority of common posterior acetabular injuries. Trochanteric osteotomy can be used to extend the exposure of the Kocher-Langenbeck approach superiorly and anteriorly. We evaluated the functional outcome of common acetabular fractures operated on through the Kocher-Langenbeck approach with or without trochanteric flip osteotomy. Material and methods. This prospective study enrolled 42 patients with posterior wall, posterior column, transverse, posterior wall with posterior column, transverse with posterior wall and both column acetabular fractures. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach was used in 35 patients and trochanteric flip osteotomy was done in 7 patients. The radiological outcome was evaluated by Matta’s criteria and the functional outcome was evaluated using modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel criteria. Results. D’Aubigne Postel scores at the final follow-up were excellent in 12 patients, good in 18, fair in 8 and poor in 4. Thirty-seven patients had congruent reduction (anatomical in 29, imperfect in 8) and 5 patients had non-congruent reduction on radiographs as per Matta’s criteria. Radiographic congruity (88.09%, 37 out of 42 cases) correlated fairly well with the functional outcome (excellent or good functional outcome in 71.4%, 30 out of 42 cases). The complications included traumatic nerve palsy (3 cases), iatrogenic nerve palsy (2 cases), deep venous thrombosis (2 cases), wound infection (3 cases), non-congruent reduction (5 cases), 8 cases of osteoarthritis of hip, 2 cases of avascular necrosis of femoral head and 3 cases of heterotrophic ossification. Conclusions. 1. Surgical treatment of common acetabular fractures with major posterior involvement can be attempted via a single posterior approach (Kocher-Langen­beck with or without trochanteric flip osteo­tomy) and leads to good-to-excellent results in a majority of the cases. 2. It is superior to conservative management, which has been found to be accompanied by a much higher rate of complications. 3. A thorough study of the pre-opera­tive radiographs, Judet’s views and 3D-reconstructed CT images helps in classifying the fracture and thereby assigning or not assigning it for the posterior approach.


2009 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameer Naranje ◽  
Prasoon Shamshery ◽  
C. S. Yadav ◽  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
H. L. Nag

1985 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Adam ◽  
J.L. Labbe ◽  
Y. Alberge ◽  
P. Austry ◽  
P. Delcroix ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kunal Mohan ◽  
James M. Broderick ◽  
Hasnain Raza ◽  
Brendan O’Daly ◽  
Michael Leonard

Abstract Introduction  The incidence of acetabular fractures in the elderly population is ever increasing. While management of acetabular fractures in young patients following high-energy trauma is well described, treatment of the elderly patient subgroup is complex and requires a unique, individualized approach. A variety of treatment strategies including operative and non-operative approaches exists to manage this vulnerable patient group. Conservative management of acetabular fractures in the elderly continues to play an important role in treatment of both stable fracture patterns and those medically unfit for surgery. Aim  This review assessing the current literature was undertaken with the purpose of summarising the challenges of management in this at-risk cohort as well as quantifying the role and outcomes following conservative management in the elderly.  Conclusion Our recommendation is that conservative management of acetabular fractures in the elderly can be considered as a treatment option on a case-by-case basis accounting for patient, injury, and surgical factors. If it is to be pursued, we advise a multidisciplinary approach focused on early mobility, minimisation of risk and regular follow-up to optimise patient outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yizhou Wan ◽  
Yan Ma ◽  
Sheng Yao ◽  
Lian Zeng ◽  
Yulong Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: As the rate of geriatric acetabular fractures was increasing gradually and accompanied with the quadrilateral surface(QLS) involved resulting by impacting from the head of femur, which usually leaded to the dislocation/subluxation of the head of femur and intra-pelvic medial displacement of the QLS. Traditionally, applying an infra-pectineal buttress plate in the true pelvis to resist the protrusive fragments of the QLS, however, these plates with small contact area could not provide enough buttress effect to age-related fractures. This study was to evaluate the “frame and buttress” fixation strategy for treatment of geriatric acetabular anterior fractures(GAAF).Methods: A cohort of 28 patients with acetabular fractures involving QLS were managed operatively with the “frame and buttress” fixation strategy with a single pelvic anterior approach. 7 cases were transverse, 3 cases were posterior column, 8 cases were associated both columns, 4 cases were anterior posterior hemi-transverse and 6 cases were T-type patterns fracture. The quality of reduction, functional outcomes and complicates were recorded for analyzing.Results: Functional outcomes were 15 cases in excellent; 9 cases were good; 3 cases were fair, and 1 case was poor. The quality of surgical reduction was evaluated by the Matta score system, which was graded as excellent in 17 cases, good in 9 cases and poor in 2 cases, respectively. No loss or failure of internal fixation, no second dislocation/subluxation of femoral head and no complications like infection were observed.Conclusions: The “frame and buttress” fixation strategy provided firm method for treating GAAF, the “frame” formed rigid fixation structure for acetabular fractures and the “buttress” resisted protrusive QLS.


Author(s):  
Motasem Salameh ◽  
Mohammad Hammad ◽  
Elhadi Babikir ◽  
Abdulaziz F. Ahmed ◽  
Bivin George ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-325
Author(s):  
Dr.Amarjit Kaur ◽  
◽  
Dr.Simmi Bhatnagar ◽  
Dr.Navkiran Kaur ◽  
Dr.JaswinderKaur Mohi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document