scholarly journals Development of An Effective Design for A Down-hole Water Sink to Control Water in Oil Production Wells

2021 ◽  
pp. 100072
Author(s):  
Mohammadsajjad Zeynolabedini ◽  
Mehdi Assareh
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babalola Daramola

Abstract This publication presents how an oil asset unlocked idle production after numerous production upsets and a gas hydrate blockage. It also uses economics to justify facilities enhancement projects for flow assurance. Field F is an offshore oil field with eight subsea wells tied back to a third party FPSO vessel. Field F was shut down for turnaround maintenance in 2015. After the field was brought back online, one of the production wells (F5) failed to flow. An evaluation of the reservoir, well, and facilities data suggested that there was a gas hydrate blockage in the subsea pipeline between the well head and the FPSO vessel. A subsea intervention vessel was then hired to execute a pipeline clean-out operation, which removed the gas hydrate, and restored F5 well oil production. To minimise oil production losses due to flow assurance issues, the asset team evaluated the viability of installing a test pipeline and a second methanol umbilical as facilities enhancement projects. The pipeline clean-out operation delivered 5400 barrels of oil per day production to the asset. The feasibility study suggested that installing a second methanol umbilical and a test pipeline are economically attractive. It is recommended that the new methanol umbilical is installed to guarantee oil flow from F5 and future infill production wells. The test pipeline can be used to clean up new wells, to induce low pressure wells, and for well testing, well sampling, water salinity evaluation, tracer evaluation, and production optimisation. This paper presents production upset diagnosis and remediation steps actioned in a producing oil field, and aids the justification of methanol umbilical capacity upgrade and test pipeline installations as facilities enhancement projects. It also indicates that gas hydrate blockage can be prevented by providing adequate methanol umbilical capacity for timely dosing of oil production wells.


Petroleum ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ali Ahmadi ◽  
Morteza Galedarzadeh ◽  
Seyed Reza Shadizadeh

2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (02) ◽  
pp. 187-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco R. Thiele ◽  
Roderick P. Batycky

Summary This paper describes a novel approach to predict injection- and production-well rate targets for improved management of waterfloods. The methodology centers on the unique ability of streamlines to define dynamic well allocation factors (WAFs) between injection and production wells. Streamlines allow well allocation factors to be broken down additionally into phase rates at either end of each injector/producer pair. Armed with these unique data, it is possible to define the injection efficiency (IE) for each injector and for injector/producer pairs in a simulation model. The IE quantifies how much oil can be recovered at a producing well for every unit of water injected by an offset injector connected to it. Because WAFs are derived directly from streamlines, the data reflect all the complexities impacting the dynamic behavior of the reservoir model, including the spatial permeability and porosity distributions, fault locations, the underlying computational grid, relative permeability data, pressure/volume/temperature (PVT) properties, and most importantly, historical well rates. The possibility to define IEs through streamline simulation stands in contrast to the ad hoc definition of geometric WAFs and simple surveillance methods used by many practicing reservoir engineers today. Once IEs are known, improved waterflood management can be implemented by reallocating injection water from low-efficiency to high-efficiency injectors. Even in the case in which water cannot be reallocated because of local surface-facility constraints, knowing IEs on an injector/producer pair allows the setting of target rates to maintain oil production while reducing water production. We demonstrate this methodology by first introducing the concept of IEs, then use a small reservoir as an example application. Introduction Local areas of water cycling and poor sweep exist as a flood matures. Current flood management is restricted to surveillance methods or workflows centered on finite-difference (FD) simulation, where areas of bypassed oil are identified and then rate changes, producer/injector conversions, or infill-drilling scenarios are tested. However, identifying and testing improved management scenarios in this way can be laborious, particularly for waterfloods with a large number of wells and/or a relatively high-resolution numerical grid. For mature fields that have potential for improved production without introducing new wells or producer/injector conversions, the main goal is to manage well rates so as to reduce cycling of the injected fluid while maintaining or even increasing oil production. Reservoir engineers have no easy or automated way to identify injection patterns, well-pair connections, or areas of inefficiency beyond simple standard fixed-pattern surveillance techniques (Baker 1997; Baker 1998; Batycky et al. 2005). Such methods are approximate at best owing to the need to define geometric allocation factors and fixed patterns, which suffer from "out-of-pattern" flow. These limitations are removed through streamline-based surveillance models (Batycky et al. 2005). By adding a transport step along streamlines, streamline simulation (3DSL 2006) can additionally identify how much oil production results from an associated injector, quantifying the efficiency down to an individual injector/producer pair. It is this crucial piece of information—the efficiency of an injector/producer pair—that allows an improved estimation of future target rates, leading to improved reservoir flood management.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 3673-3687
Author(s):  
Asekhame U. Yadua ◽  
Kazeem A. Lawal ◽  
Oluchukwu M. Okoh ◽  
Mathilda I. Ovuru ◽  
Stella I. Eyitayo ◽  
...  

Abstract Unstable well flow is detrimental to the technical and economic performances of an integrated production system. To mitigate this problem, it is imperative to understand the stability limits and predict the onset of unstable production of an oil well. Taking advantage of the phenomenon of slug flow and the onset of unstable equilibrium from inflow performance and vertical lift curves of a producing well, this paper presents a new method for evaluating the stability of an oil production well on the one hand and estimating its stable production limits in terms of wellhead flowing pressure and flow rate on the other hand. A novelty of this work is the introduction and quantitative characterization of three distinct stability phases in the performance of a production well. These phases are uniquely identified as stable, transition and unstable flows. Practical examples and field cases demonstrate the robustness of the new method. When compared against results from a commercial wellbore simulator for the same set of problems, the new method yields an average absolute deviation of 5.3%. Additional validation tests against a common, but more computationally demanding method of stability analysis yield satisfactory results. Several parametric tests conducted with the proposed model and method provide additional insights into some of the major factors that control well stability, highlighting scope for production optimization in practice. Overall, this work should find applications in the design and management of production wells.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanislav Ursegov ◽  
Evgenii Taraskin ◽  
Armen Zakharian

Abstract Globally, steam injection for heavy and high-viscous oil recovery is increasing, including carbonate reservoirs. Lack of full understanding such reservoir heating and limited information about production and injection rates of individual wells require to forecast steam injection not only deterministic and simple liquid displacement characteristic modeling types, but also the data-driven one, which covers the adaptive modeling. The implementation and validation of the adaptive system is presented in this paper by one of the world's largest carbonate reservoirs with heavy and high-viscous oil of the Usinsk field. Steam injection forecasting in such reservoirs is complicated by the unstable well interactions and relatively low additional oil production. In the adaptive geological model, vertical dimensions of cells are similar to gross thicknesses of stratigraphic layers. Geological parameters of cells with drilled wells do not necessarily match actual parameters of those wells since the cells include information of neighboring wells. During the adaptive hydrodynamic modeling, a reservoir pressure is reproduced by cumulative production and injection allocation among the 3D grid cells. Steam injection forecasting is firstly based on the liquid displacement characteristics, which are later modified considering well interactions. To estimate actual oil production of steamflooding using the reservoir adaptive geological and hydrodynamic models, dimensionless interaction coefficients of injection and production wells were first calculated. Then, fuzzy logic functions were created to evaluate the base oil production of reacting wells. For most of those wells, actual oil production was 25 – 30 % higher than the base case. Oil production of steamflooding for the next three-year period was carried out by modeling two options of the reservoir further development - with and without steam injection. Generally, forecasted oil production of the option with steam injection was about 5 % higher. The forecasting effectiveness of cyclic steam stimulations of production wells was done using the cross-section method, when the test sample was divided into two groups - the best and the worst, for which the average forecasted oil rates after the stimulations were respectively higher or lower than the average actual oil rate after the stimulations for the entire sample. The difference between the average actual oil rates after the stimulations of the best and the worst groups was 32 %, i.e. this is in how much the actual oil production could have increased if only the best group of the sample had been treated.


2021 ◽  
pp. 51-55
Author(s):  
I.Z. Denislamov ◽  
◽  
A.R. Khafizov ◽  
R.R. Ishbaev ◽  
L.R. Galimova ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikita Dadakin ◽  
Marat Nukhaev ◽  
Konstantin Rymarenko ◽  
Sergey Grishenko ◽  
Galymzan Aitkaliev ◽  
...  

Abstract One of the critical tasks during the oil rim development is to control production wells to prevent water breakthroughs and gas outs. Key factors are control over drawdown and on-time choke restriction of the well in case of a gas out and an extreme gas factor increase.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document