Contemporary Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Provides Survival Benefit in Clear-cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. e730-e738
Author(s):  
Carlotta Palumbo ◽  
Francesco A. Mistretta ◽  
Sophie Knipper ◽  
Angela Pecoraro ◽  
Zhe Tian ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 499-499
Author(s):  
Dipesh Uprety ◽  
Amir Bista ◽  
Yazhini Vallatharasu ◽  
David E. Marinier

499 Background: The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has not been clearly understood after the approval of new targeted therapies, particularly in an elderly population. We therefore conducted this study to evaluate survival difference (CN vs. no CN) among elderly patients with mRCC in targeted era. To limit the heterogeneity in use of targeted agents we define targeted era as February 2006 to December 2011, as sunitinib got FDA approval for use in RCC in January 2006. Methods: We utilized Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER-18) database to identify elderly (≥ 65 years) patients with mRCC, as first primary malignancy, who were diagnosed between February 2006 and 2011. Kaplan-Meier curve and log rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between patients receiving CN and not receiving CN. Cox proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analysis. Results: Out of 3,365 patients, 1088 (32.3%) received CN. There was a significant survival benefit for those who received CN vs. those who did not (Median OS: 22 months vs. 5 months, p< 0.001; Median CSS: 25 months vs. 6 months, p<0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, race, T-stage, N-stage, histology types, and year of diagnosis, patient receiving CN had significantly better 3-year OS and 3-year CSS compared to patients not receiving CN with HR of 0.37, 95% CI of 0.34 to 0.41; p<0.001 and HR of 0.37, 95% CI of 0.34 to 0.42, p <0.001 respectively. Among patients who received CN, younger age at diagnosis, other races (other than Caucasian and African American), and N0 stage were found to be independent factors predicting better survival. Conclusions: SEER database lacks individual patient’s information. One may argue that the non-surgical group may have larger proportion of patients with poor performance status. Despite this limitation, our study showed that CN has significant survival benefit and should be a serious consideration in elderly patients if they have good performance status.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 581-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Graham ◽  
Connor Wells ◽  
Frede Donskov ◽  
Jae-Lyun Lee ◽  
Anna Paola Fraccon ◽  
...  

581 Background: There is evidence that cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) may be beneficial in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but the role of CN in patients with papillary histology is unclear. Methods: Using the IMDC database, a retrospective analysis was performed on patients with papillary mRCC treated with or without CN. Baseline characteristics and IMDC risk factors were collected. Median overall survival (OS) was determined for both patient groups. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to control for imbalances in individual IMDC risk factors. Results: In total, 353 patients with papillary mRCC with (n = 75) or without (n = 278) a component of clear cell histology were identified. Median follow-up time was 57.1 months (95% CI 32.9-77.8) and the OS from the start of first-line targeted therapy for the entire cohort was 13.2 months (95% CI 12.0-16.1). Baseline characteristics are in Table 1 and patients who had CN were more likely to be younger, with better KPS, and have sarcomatoid histology. Median OS in patients with CN was 16.3 months (95% CI 13.1-19.2), compared to 8.6 months (95% CI 6.1-12.2; p < 0.0001) in the no CN group. When adjusted for individual IMDC risk factors, the hazard ratio (HR) of death for CN was 0.62 (95% CI 0.45-0.85; p = 0.0031). Conclusions: The use of CN in patients with mRCC and papillary histology appears to be associated with improved survival when compared to no CN after adjustment for risk criteria. A clinical trial in this rare population may not be possible but this data does corroborate with clear cell literature. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document