Biomechanical analysis of the role of hinge support fixators on hinge stability in medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy

2021 ◽  
pp. 105528
Author(s):  
Takehiko Matsushita ◽  
Takenori Akiyama ◽  
Kei Osano ◽  
Yasuharu Yokoyama ◽  
Ken Okazaki
Author(s):  
Marco-Christopher Rupp ◽  
Philipp W. Winkler ◽  
Patricia M. Lutz ◽  
Markus Irger ◽  
Philipp Forkel ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the incidence, morphology, and associated complications of medial cortical hinge fractures after lateral closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LCW-DFO) for varus malalignment and to identify constitutional and technical factors predisposing for hinge fracture and consecutive complications. Methods Seventy-nine consecutive patients with a mean age of 47 ± 12 years who underwent LCW-DFO for symptomatic varus malalignment at the authors’ institution between 01/2007 and 03/2018 with a minimum of 2-year postoperative time interval were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. Demographic and surgical data were collected. Measurements evaluating the osteotomy cut (length, wedge height, hinge angle) and the location of the hinge (craniocaudal and mediolateral orientation, relation to the adductor tubercle) were conducted on postoperative anterior–posterior knee radiographs and the incidence and morphology of medial cortical hinge fractures was assessed. A risk factor analysis of constitutional and technical factors predisposing for the incidence of a medial cortical hinge fracture and consecutive complications was conducted. Results The incidence of medial cortical hinge fractures was 48%. The most frequent morphological type was an extension fracture type (68%), followed by a proximal (21%) and distal fracture type (11%). An increased length of the osteotomy in mm (53.1 ± 10.9 vs. 57.7 ± 9.6; p = 0.049), an increased height of the excised wedge in mm (6.5 ± 1.9 vs. 7.9 ± 3; p = 0.040) as well as a hinge location in the medial sector of an established sector grid (p = 0.049) were shown to significantly predispose for the incidence of a medial cortical hinge fracture. The incidence of malunion after hinge fracture (14%) was significantly increased after mediolateral dislocation of the medial cortical bone > 2 mm (p < 0.05). Conclusion Medial cortical hinge fractures after LCW-DFO are a common finding. An increased risk of sustaining a hinge fracture has to be expected with increasing osteotomy wedge height and a hinge position close to the medial cortex. Furthermore, dislocation of a medial hinge fracture > 2 mm was associated with malunion and should, therefore, be avoided. Level of evidence Prognostic study; Level IV.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 2945-2951
Author(s):  
Tae Woo Kim ◽  
Myung Chul Lee ◽  
Jae Ho Cho ◽  
Jong Seop Kim ◽  
Yong Seuk Lee

Background: Although an appropriate hinge position to prevent unstable lateral hinge fractures is well established in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy, the position during medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy has not been elucidated. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to evaluate the ideal hinge position that would prevent an unstable lateral hinge fracture during biplanar medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy based on soft tissue coverage and bone density around the hinge area. The hypothesis was that the ideal hinge position could be clarified by analyzing soft tissue coverage and bone density around the lateral hinge area. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In 20 cadaveric knees (mean age, 70.3 ± 19.2 years), the femoral attachment of the gastrocnemius lateral head was quantitatively analyzed as a soft tissue stabilizer using digital photography and fluoroscopy. Then, medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy was performed, locating the lateral hinge either inside (group 1) or outside (group 2) the femoral attachment of the gastrocnemius lateral head, and the incidence of unstable lateral hinge fractures was compared between the 2 groups. Cortical bone density around the lateral hinge was measured using Hounsfield units on 30 computed tomography scans and reconstructed as a 3-dimensional mapping model. The transitional zone with low bone density was regarded as the safe hinge position with an increased capacity for bone deformation. Results: The upper and lower margins of the femoral attachment of the gastrocnemius lateral head were 9.1 ± 0.9 mm above and 8.0 ± 1.4 mm below the upper border of the lateral femoral condyle, respectively, and the femoral attachment of the gastrocnemius lateral head was widest in the anteroposterior dimension 0.4 ± 1.7 mm above the upper border of the lateral femoral condyle. The incidence of unstable lateral hinge fractures during osteotomy was significantly decreased in group 1 compared with group 2 (group 1: 0/10; group 2: 5/10; P = .01). An isolated transitional zone with low bone density was observed in all 30 knees and located 1.3 ± 0.8 mm above the upper border of the lateral femoral condyle. Bone density of the transitional zone with low bone density was significantly lower than surrounding femoral cortices ( P < .001). Conclusion: Only the upper border of the lateral femoral condyle can be recommended as an ideal hinge position to prevent unstable lateral hinge fractures during biplanar medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy based on soft tissue coverage and bone density. Clinical Relevance: When the hinge is positioned at the upper border of the lateral femoral condyle during biplanar medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy, the risk of unstable hinge fractures can be minimized.


2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 361-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas C. Duethman ◽  
Christopher D. Bernard ◽  
Christopher L. Camp ◽  
Aaron J. Krych ◽  
Michael J. Stuart

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 232596711664990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Chahla ◽  
Justin J. Mitchell ◽  
Daniel J. Liechti ◽  
Gilbert Moatshe ◽  
Travis J. Menge ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chong Bum Chang ◽  
Gautam M. Shetty ◽  
Jong Seong Lee ◽  
Young Chan Kim ◽  
Jae Ho Kwon ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Joseph J. Ruzbarsky ◽  
Justin W. Arner ◽  
Taylor J. Ridley ◽  
Joseph D. Cooper ◽  
Thomas R. Hackett

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document