P 59. Real-time prefrontal beta phase estimation during emotional interference inhibition

2021 ◽  
Vol 132 (8) ◽  
pp. e28
Author(s):  
F. Müller-Dahlhaus ◽  
C. Zrenner ◽  
G. Janzarik ◽  
J. Metsomaa ◽  
U. Ziemann ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol E104.D (7) ◽  
pp. 1002-1016
Author(s):  
Takaaki SAEKI ◽  
Yuki SAITO ◽  
Shinnosuke TAKAMICHI ◽  
Hiroshi SARUWATARI

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anirudh Wodeyar ◽  
Mark Schatza ◽  
Alik S. Widge ◽  
Uri T. Eden ◽  
Mark A. Kramer

AbstractBrain rhythms have been proposed to facilitate brain function, with an especially important role attributed to the phase of low frequency rhythms. Understanding the role of phase in neural function requires interventions that perturb neural activity at a target phase, necessitating estimation of phase in real-time. Current methods for real-time phase estimation rely on bandpass filtering, which assumes narrowband signals and couples the signal and noise in the phase estimate, adding noise to the phase and impairing detections of relationships between phase and behavior. To address this, we propose a state space phase estimator for real-time tracking of phase. By tracking the analytic signal as a latent state, this framework avoids the requirement of bandpass filtering, separately models the signal and the noise, accounts for rhythmic confounds, and provides credible intervals for the phase estimate. We demonstrate in simulations that the state space phase estimator outperforms current state-of-the-art real-time methods in the contexts of common confounds such as broadband rhythms, phase resets and co-occurring rhythms. Finally, we show applications of this approach to in vivo data. The method is available as a ready-to-use plug-in for the OpenEphys acquisition system, making it widely available for use in experiments.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 3491-3497
Author(s):  
Inseung Kang ◽  
Dean D. Molinaro ◽  
Srijan Duggal ◽  
Yanrong Chen ◽  
Pratik Kunapuli ◽  
...  

NeuroImage ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 214 ◽  
pp. 116761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Zrenner ◽  
Dragana Galevska ◽  
Jaakko O. Nieminen ◽  
David Baur ◽  
Maria-Ioanna Stefanou ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 1192-1209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiting Justin Lu ◽  
Paul Siqueira ◽  
Vishwas Vijayendra ◽  
Harikrishnan Chandrikakutty ◽  
Russell Tessier

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anirudh Wodeyar ◽  
Mark Schatza ◽  
Alik S Widge ◽  
Uri T Eden ◽  
Mark A Kramer

Brain rhythms have been proposed to facilitate brain function, with an especially important role attributed to the phase of low frequency rhythms. Understanding the role of phase in neural function requires interventions that perturb neural activity at a target phase, necessitating estimation of phase in real-time. Current methods for real-time phase estimation rely on bandpass filtering, which assumes narrowband signals and couples the signal and noise in the phase estimate, adding noise to the phase and impairing detections of relationships between phase and behavior. To address this, we propose a state space phase estimator for real-time tracking of phase. By tracking the analytic signal as a latent state, this framework avoids the requirement of bandpass filtering, separately models the signal and the noise, accounts for rhythmic confounds, and provides credible intervals for the phase estimate. We demonstrate in simulations that the state space phase estimator outperforms current state-of-the-art real-time methods in the contexts of common confounds such as broadband rhythms, phase resets and co-occurring rhythms. Finally, we show applications of this approach to in vivo data. The method is available as a ready-to-use plug-in for the OpenEphys acquisition system, making it widely available for use in experiments.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 577-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriano A. Berni ◽  
Tobias Gehring ◽  
Bo M. Nielsen ◽  
Vitus Händchen ◽  
Matteo G. A. Paris ◽  
...  

1979 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 41-47
Author(s):  
Donald A. Landman

This paper describes some recent results of our quiescent prominence spectrometry program at the Mees Solar Observatory on Haleakala. The observations were made with the 25 cm coronagraph/coudé spectrograph system using a silicon vidicon detector. This detector consists of 500 contiguous channels covering approximately 6 or 80 Å, depending on the grating used. The instrument is interfaced to the Observatory’s PDP 11/45 computer system, and has the important advantages of wide spectral response, linearity and signal-averaging with real-time display. Its principal drawback is the relatively small target size. For the present work, the aperture was about 3″ × 5″. Absolute intensity calibrations were made by measuring quiet regions near sun center.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document