scholarly journals Male gender is an important clinical risk factor for iron deficiency in healthy infants

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. e219-e222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henedina Antunes ◽  
Cristina Santos ◽  
Susana Carvalho ◽  
Sónia Gonçalves ◽  
Altamiro Costa-Pereira
1980 ◽  
pp. 54-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. B. Kannel ◽  
Paul Sorlie ◽  
Frederick Brand ◽  
W. P. Castelli ◽  
P. M. McNamara ◽  
...  

Bone ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. S151 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Hans ◽  
R. Winzenrieth⁎ ◽  
B. Aubry-Rozier ◽  
D. Stoll ◽  
O. Lamy ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. S600
Author(s):  
N. Alsaadoun ◽  
K. Kopciuk ◽  
D. Hao ◽  
F. Hao ◽  
A. Elegbede ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1935.2-1935
Author(s):  
D. Palma Sanchez ◽  
A. Haro ◽  
M. J. Moreno ◽  
E. Peñas ◽  
M. Mayor ◽  
...  

Background:Axial spondyloarthritis (SpAax) presents an increased risk of vertebral fracture not fully detected by Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The FRAX algorithms give the 10-year probability of hip fracture and of mayor osteoporotic fracture (clinical spine, forearm, hip or shoulder fracture), taking into account 11 clinical risk factors.Objectives:To analyze the suitability of FRAX to detect the risk of fracture in patients with SpAax. To assess whether the incorporation of SpAax as a clinical risk factor to conventional FRAX provides additional information.Methods:Cross-sectional study in which SpAax patients (ASAS criteria) were included. Clinical-demographic and related to the disease variables were collected. FRIDEX model for Spanish population was used to determine low, intermediate or high risk of mayor fracture by FRAX. These results were compared with those obtained by DXA and trabecular bone score (TBS). In the statistical analysis we used mean and standard deviation (SD) in quantitative variables and frequency in qualitative ones. To compare means among 3 groups, ANOVA test was used.Results:The characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. According to FRIDEX, no patient had high risk of fracture and 2.4% had intermediate risk. When SpAax was added as a risk factor, no patient had high risk of fracture and 6.1% presented intermediate risk. According to DXA, 7.3% had high risk of fracture and 41.3% intermediate risk. TBS detected high risk of fracture in 18.3% and intermediate risk also in 18.3% of patients.Table 1.Sociodemographic, clinical and related characteristics with the disease (BMD: bone mineral density, BMI: index of body mass)Gender (Male), n (%)61 (74.4)Age, mean ± SD49.48 ± 12.47BMI, mean ± SD27.13 ± 4.42Smoking, n (%)26 (31.7)Diabetes mellitus, n (%)9 (11)Osteoporotic fracture, n (%)1 (1.2)Disease duration (years), mean ± SD11.77 ± 10syndesmophytes, n (%)38 (46.3)ASDAS-PCR, mean ± SD2.55 ± 1.07Lumbar BMD (g / cm2), mean ± SD1.032 ± 0.180BMD femoral neck (g / cm2), mean ± SD0.816 ± 0.140Lumbar TBS, mean ± SD1.383 ± 0.133Conclusion:FRAX does not seem an adequate tool to detect the risk of fracture in patients with SpAax since it did not improve the results obtained by DXA meanwhile TBS did. The incorporation of SpAax as a clinical risk factor to conventional FRAX did not provide additional information in most casesDisclosure of Interests:None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document