scholarly journals Conceptual relations predict colexification across languages

Cognition ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 201 ◽  
pp. 104280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Xu ◽  
Khang Duong ◽  
Barbara C. Malt ◽  
Serena Jiang ◽  
Mahesh Srinivasan
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Paliczuk

The conceptualization of space is manifested in language through diverse linguistic structures. Space, one of the most significant analytical categories not only in linguistics, introduces a variety of senses and conceptual relations in the construction of communicative meaning. While there are several approaches to linguistic studies, the most obvious choice for this type of analysis seems to be Cognitive Linguistics, with some of its theoretical currents and the Cognitive Grammar of Ronald W. Langacker (1987, 1991a, 1991b, 1995, 2008) in particular. In his works, Langacker often refers to spatial and visual relationships that provide useful illustrations to depict different conceptual structures and relationships. Indeed, the relations between visual perception and conceptualization concerns numerous aspects of the semantics of natural language (E. Tabakowska, 1999: 59). The paper aims to analyse the concept of the Italian verb ‘mettere’ (‘to put’), apparently simple and yet, as it will be shown, rich and varied in meaning.


PMLA ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Clark Hulse

Shakespeare’s Venus and Adonis—both in the specific way the myth is understood and, more important, in the poetic and conceptual forms in which it is cast—is rooted in the mythography of the sixteenth century. As in the attribute system of allegorical painting, the physical characteristics of Venus and Adonis reveal their histories and signify the alternately comic and serious qualities of love. The traditional plot has been scrapped, with sexual harmony replaced by strife and the poem turned into a continual debate over the nature of love. This debate is never resolved rationally. Instead, the multiple aspects of love are periodically condensed into unified images, which then generate further paradox: Venus versus Diana, freedom versus bondage, red versus white, fire versus water. This dialogue of images, a familiar iconographic technique, becomes a characteristically Shakespearean method of esthetic resolution, with conceptual relations to the primary forms of myth.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 923-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Schmidtke ◽  
Christina L. Gagné ◽  
Victor Kuperman ◽  
Thomas L. Spalding ◽  
Benjamin V. Tucker

2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 524-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werdie (CW) van Staden ◽  
Kobus Coetzee
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 63-74
Author(s):  
Isaac Nevo ◽  
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anuška Štambuk

Abstract When communicating new knowledge we often use metaphors that provide understanding of one kind of experience by relating it to another. Apart from their use in basic linguistic communication, metaphorical models play an important part in communicating new discoveries in scientific theories. They also shape our experience and affect our picture of the world. The imaginative description of conceptual relations stimulates the research process, providing the basis for new discoveries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document