A robust computational approach for jaw movement detection and classification in grazing cattle using acoustic signals

2022 ◽  
Vol 192 ◽  
pp. 106569
Author(s):  
Luciano S. Martinez-Rau ◽  
José O. Chelotti ◽  
Sebastián R. Vanrell ◽  
Julio R. Galli ◽  
Santiago A. Utsumi ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 173 ◽  
pp. 105443 ◽  
Author(s):  
José O. Chelotti ◽  
Sebastián R. Vanrell ◽  
Luciano S. Martinez Rau ◽  
Julio R. Galli ◽  
Alejandra M. Planisich ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 138 ◽  
pp. 167-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nestor N. Deniz ◽  
José O. Chelotti ◽  
Julio R. Galli ◽  
Alejandra M. Planisich ◽  
Marcelo J. Larripa ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 151 ◽  
pp. 392-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastián R. Vanrell ◽  
José O. Chelotti ◽  
Julio R. Galli ◽  
Santiago A. Utsumi ◽  
Leonardo L. Giovanini ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
S. Nakahara ◽  
D. M. Maher

Since Head first demonstrated the advantages of computer displayed theoretical intensities from defective crystals, computer display techniques have become important in image analysis. However the computational methods employed resort largely to numerical integration of the dynamical equations of electron diffraction. As a consequence, the interpretation of the results in terms of the defect displacement field and diffracting variables is difficult to follow in detail. In contrast to this type of computational approach which is based on a plane-wave expansion of the excited waves within the crystal (i.e. Darwin representation ), Wilkens assumed scattering of modified Bloch waves by an imperfect crystal. For localized defects, the wave amplitudes can be described analytically and this formulation has been used successfully to predict the black-white symmetry of images arising from small dislocation loops.


1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 400-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia A. Hinton ◽  
Winston M. C. Arokiasamy

It has been hypothesized that typical speech movements do not involve large muscular forces and that normal speakers use less than 20% of the maximum orofacial muscle contractile forces that are available (e.g., Amerman, 1993; Barlow & Abbs, 1984; Barlow & Netsell, 1986; DePaul & Brooks, 1993). However, no direct evidence for this hypothesis has been provided. This study investigated the percentage of maximum interlabial contact pressures (force per unit area) typically used during speech production. The primary conclusion of this study is that normal speakers typically use less than 20% of the available interlabial contact pressure, whether or not the jaw contributes to bilabial closure. Production of the phone [p] at conversational rate and intensity generated an average of 10.56% of maximum available interlabial pressure (MILP) when jaw movement was not restricted and 14.62% when jaw movement was eliminated.


Author(s):  
Elizabeth S Baranowski ◽  
Sreejita Ghosh ◽  
Cedric HL Shackleton ◽  
Angela E Taylor ◽  
Beverly A Hughes ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Andújar-Vera ◽  
Cristina García-Fontana ◽  
Sheila González-Salvatierra ◽  
Manuel Muñoz-Torres ◽  
Beatriz García-Fontana

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document