Pediatric Trauma

2022 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-71
Author(s):  
Gan Golshteyn ◽  
Anna Katsman
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Trauma

Injured Children Fare Best at Pediatric Trauma Centers

2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
JANE SALODOF MACNEIL
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centers

Pediatric Trauma Patients with Temporal Bone Fractures Are at Risk for Multiple Cranial CT Scans

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Ewy ◽  
Martin Piazza ◽  
Brian Thorp ◽  
Michael Phillips ◽  
Carolyn Quinsey
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Temporal Bone ◽  
Bone Fractures ◽  
Pediatric Trauma ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Cranial Ct

Validation of the Surgical Intervention for Traumatic Injury scale in the pediatric population

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-97
Author(s):  
David Dornbos ◽  
Christy Monson ◽  
Andrew Look ◽  
Kristin Huntoon ◽  
Luke G. F. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Traumatic Injury ◽  
Pediatric Trauma ◽  
Current Method ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
Surgical Decompression ◽  
Operative Intervention ◽  
Admission Diagnosis ◽  
Communication Tool

OBJECTIVEWhile the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) has been effective in describing severity in traumatic brain injury (TBI), there is no current method for communicating the possible need for surgical intervention. This study utilizes a recently developed scoring system, the Surgical Intervention for Traumatic Injury (SITI) scale, which was developed to efficiently communicate the potential need for surgical decompression in adult patients with TBI. The objective of this study was to apply the SITI scale to a pediatric population to provide a tool to increase communication of possible surgical urgency.METHODSThe SITI scale uses both radiographic and clinical findings, including the GCS score on presentation, pupillary examination, and CT findings. To examine the scale in pediatric TBI, a neurotrauma database at a level 1 pediatric trauma center was retrospectively evaluated, and the SITI score for all patients with an admission diagnosis of TBI between 2010 and 2015 was calculated. The primary endpoint was operative intervention, defined as a craniotomy or craniectomy for decompression, performed within the first 24 hours of admission.RESULTSA total of 1524 patients met inclusion criteria for the study during the 5-year span: 1469 (96.4%) were managed nonoperatively and 55 (3.6%) patients underwent emergent operative intervention. The mean SITI score was 4.98 ± 0.31 for patients undergoing surgical intervention and 0.41 ± 0.02 for patients treated nonoperatively (p < 0.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve was used to examine the diagnostic accuracy of the SITI scale in this pediatric population and was found to be 0.98. Further evaluation of patients presenting with moderate to severe TBI revealed a mean SITI score of 5.51 ± 0.31 in 40 (15.3%) operative patients and 1.55 ± 0.02 in 221 (84.7%) nonoperative patients, with an AUROC curve of 0.95.CONCLUSIONSThe SITI scale was designed to be a simple, objective communication tool regarding the potential need for surgical decompression after TBI. Application of this scale to a pediatric population reveals that the score correlated with the perceived need for emergent surgical intervention, further suggesting its potential utility in clinical practice.

The Frequency of Random Findings on Abdominal / Pelvis Computed Tomography in Pediatric Trauma Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betül Tiryaki Baştuğ
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Incidental Findings ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Pediatric Trauma ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Injured Child ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Discharge Summaries

Aims: In this study, we aimed to find the percentage of random pathologies and abdominopelvic region anomalies that are not related to trauma in pediatric patients. Background: An abdominal assessment of an injured child usually involves computed tomography imaging of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) to determine the presence and size of injuries. Imaging may accidentally reveal irrelevant findings. Objectives: Although the literature in adults has reviewed the frequency of discovering these random findings, few studies have been identified in the pediatric population. Methods: Data on 142( 38 female, 104 male) patients who underwent CTAP during their trauma evaluation between January 2019 and January 2020 dates were obtained from our level 3 pediatric trauma center trauma records. The records and CTAP images were examined retrospectively for extra traumatic pathologies and anomalies. Results: 67 patients (47%) had 81 incidental findings. There were 17 clinically significant random findings. No potential tumors were found in this population. Conclusion: Pediatric trauma CTAP reveals random findings. For further evaluation, incidental findings should be indicated in the discharge summaries.

scholarly journals Epidemiology of Pediatric Trauma During the COVID-19 Pandemic Shelter in Place

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kovi E. Bessoff ◽  
Ryan W. Han ◽  
Min Cho ◽  
Melanie Stroud ◽  
Eva M. Urrechaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Trauma
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document