The impact of vacuum-assisted excision in the management of indeterminate B3 lesions in the NHS Breast Screening Programme in England

Author(s):  
N. Sharma ◽  
E. Cornford ◽  
S. Cheung ◽  
H. Price ◽  
O. Kearins
1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
J McCann ◽  
D Stockton ◽  
N Day

Objectives To assess the impact of the National Health Service breast screening programme on overall and stage-specific incidence of breast cancer in East Anglia; also, to predict the magnitude of the screening induced reduction in breast cancer mortality. Setting Women resident in East Anglia aged 50–69, diagnosed between 1976 and 1995. Methods Comparison of numbers and incidence of breast cancer by age, stage, and mode of detection; investigation of relative contributions of advanced (stages II, III, and IV) cancers to total incidence by detection mode; estimation of the reduction in advanced cancer incidence. Results There has been a large increase in early stage incidence in the age group 50–64 targeted by the screening programme. By 1995, the estimated decrease in advanced cancer incidence was between 7 and 19%. In 1995, of all breast cancers arising in the age group 50–69 years, 33% were screen detected, 27% were interval cancers, 15% were in non-attenders, 9% were in lapsed attenders, 7% occurred before invitation, and 4% arose in women outside the birth year range for invitation. Of the advanced cancers diagnosed in 1995, 31% were interval cancers, 20% were screen detected, 19% were in non-attenders, 12% were in lapsed attenders, 8% occurred before invitation, and 4% presented in women outside the birth year range for invitation. Conclusions Screening has brought about a large increase in detection of early stage cancers. This increase has not yet been fully matched by a corresponding deficit in advanced cancers, possibly because the full effect of screening has not yet been achieved. Reducing the proportion of interval cancers is necessary to increase the effect of screening on mortality.


2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 434-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.James I. Colville ◽  
Carole A. Mallen ◽  
Lesley McLean ◽  
Neil R. McLean

BJR|Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 20180018
Author(s):  
Andrew Patric Nisbet ◽  
Andrew Borthwick-Clarke ◽  
Nic Scott ◽  
Helen Goulding ◽  
Harwood Jane

Objective: To evaluate mammography screening quality on the Island of Jersey over a 25-year period from Jan 1990 to end March 2015 from females invited between ages 50 to 75 using a 2 yearly screening interval. Jersey had a population of only around 67,000 at onset, rising to around 100,000 at the end of the 25 years. Methods: An analysis was performed of key routinely collected measures that are important to determining if a screening programme is on course to reduce breast cancer mortality such as uptake, recall rates, screen detected cancer and interval cancer rates. Further supporting indicators including grade, stage and comparative deaths from breast cancer in screen detected and not screen detected females were also assessed. Results: Over the 25-year period 19,768 females were invited to screening and 16,866 attended, giving an uptake of 85.2%. There were 501 screen detected cancers of which 400 were invasive, and 101 DCIS. 125 interval cancers presented outside screening over the 25 years. The annual recall rate over the last 20 years was <6% for prevalent round and 4% for incident round screening. Based on the standardized detection ratio (SDR) and uptake, the estimated reduction in mortality from breast cancer was calculated as 40.2%. Conclusions: Recommended population sizes for breast units range from a quarter to half a million people. For very small units like Jersey serving smaller populations, rigorous quality control is essential to maintain credibility. Despite the small size of the programme evidence shows a similar detection rate to the UK NHS Breast screening programme was achieved. In small programmes careful monitoring of rates of uptake, recall, cancer detection and interval rates are required over adequate time periods together with supporting information to show that small units can achieve national standards and detection rates necessary to reduce breast cancer mortality. Advances in knowledge: Running a small breast cancer screening programme is challenging for quality control. The impact on mortality can be predicted for small screening programmes despite their size. 10-year group survival in screen detected invasive breast cancer >90%. Interval cancers are more advanced than screen detected invasive cancers, so high suspicion is still required in breast symptoms after "normal" screen result. Mortality in lapsed/ceased attenders suggest that extending age range could be beneficial.


2002 ◽  
Vol 55 (7) ◽  
pp. 592
Author(s):  
R.James I. Colville ◽  
Neil R. McLean ◽  
Carole A. Mallen ◽  
Lesley McLean

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document