scholarly journals Patient reported outcomes following proton pencil beam scanning vs. passive scatter/uniform scanning for localized prostate cancer: Secondary analysis of PCG 001-09

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 50-54
Author(s):  
Mark V. Mishra ◽  
Rahul Khairnar ◽  
Søren M. Bentzen ◽  
Gary Larson ◽  
Henry Tsai ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Mutter ◽  
Krishan R. Jethwa ◽  
Karthik Gonuguntla ◽  
Nicholas B. Remmes ◽  
Thomas J. Whitaker ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and purpose To report dosimetry and early adverse effects, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes of a prospective study of 3-fraction pencil-beam scanning (PBS) proton accelerated partial irradiation (APBI). Materials and methods Eligibility included women age ≥ 50 years with estrogen receptor positive (ER+), sentinel lymph node negative invasive or in-situ breast cancer measuring ≤2.5 cm. The prescription was 21.9 Gy (RBE 1.1) in 3 daily fractions to the post-operative tumor bed with a 1 cm expansion. Toxicities were collected using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0, 10-point Linear Analog Scale Assessment, Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the CTCAE, and the Harvard Breast Cosmesis Scale. Results Seventy-six women were treated between 2015 and 2017. The median breast volume receiving 50% of prescription or more was 28%. Median mean heart, mean ipsilateral lung, and maximum skin dose were 0 Gy, 0.1 Gy, and 20.6 Gy, respectively. With a median follow-up of 12 months, no treatment-related toxicity grade ≥ 2 has been observed. Most common grade 1 adverse events were dermatitis (68%) and skin hyperpigmentation (18%). At 12 months, the only persistent toxicities were one patient with grade 1 breast edema and one patient with a grade 1 seroma. 90% of patients reported quality of life as ≥7 out of 10 (0 indicating “as bad as it can be” and 10 indicating “as good as it can be”) and 98% of patients reported excellent or good cosmesis. Conclusion 3-fraction PBS proton APBI is well tolerated with low rates of physician and patient reported early adverse effects. Follow-up is ongoing to assess late toxicities and disease control outcomes. Further investigation of this novel adjuvant treatment strategy is warranted.


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 4011-4019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Moteabbed ◽  
Alexei Trofimov ◽  
Fazal H. Khan ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
Gregory C. Sharp ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Aamod S. Dekhne

A clinical decision report appraising: Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Lane JA, et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(15):1425-1437. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1606221 for a patient with localized prostate cancer and concerns regarding future sexual dysfunction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document