Programming Directional Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson’s Disease: A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Early versus Delayed Stimulation Steering

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Programming directional leads poses new challenges as the optimal strategy is yet to be established. We designed a randomized control study to establish an evidence-based programming algorithm for patients with Parkinson’s disease undergoing subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation with directional leads. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Fourteen consecutive patients were randomized to programming with either early or delayed (i.e., starting with a “ring mode”) steered stimulation. Motor scores, number of programming visits, calls to the clinic, battery consumption, and stimulation adjustments required were recorded and compared between groups, using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, after 3 months of open-label programming. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Thirteen patients (25 electrodes) were included, of which 23 were steerable. Nine out of 14 electrodes allocated to delayed steered stimulation were changed to steered mode due to side effects during the course of the study. No patients (11 electrodes) initially allocated to early steered stimulation were converted to ring mode. The 2 study arms did not differ in any of the considered measures at 3 months. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Programming with early or delayed steered stimulation is equally effective in the short term. However, delayed steering is less time consuming and is not always needed.

A pilot trial of human amniotic fluid for the treatment of COVID-19

Objective Vertical transmission from SARS CoV-2-infected women is uncommon and coronavirus has not been detected in amniotic fluid. Human amniotic products have a broad immune-mediating profile. Observing that many COVID-19 patients have a profound inflammatory response to the virus, we sought to determine the influence of human amniotic fluid (hAF) on hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Results A 10-patient case series was IRB-approved to study the impact of hAF on hospitalized patients with documented COVID-19. Nine of the 10 patients survived to discharge, with one patient succumbing to the disease when enrolled on maximal ventilatory support and severe hypoxia. The study design was altered by the IRB such that the last 6 patients received higher dose of intravenous hAF. In this latter group, patients that had observed reductions in C-reactive protein were associated with improved clinical outcomes. No hAF-related adverse events were noted. Acknowledging some of the inherent limitations of this case series, these results inform and catalyze a larger scaled randomized prospective trial to further investigate hAF as a therapy for COVID-19. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04319731; March 23, 2020