Influence of wellness education on first-line icotinib hydrochloride patients with stage IV non–small cell lung cancer and their family caregivers

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 358-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Yanwei ◽  
Fang Minghui ◽  
Quan Manman ◽  
Yan Zhuchun ◽  
Liu Dongying ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Tobias Lange ◽  
Carsten Müller-Tidow ◽  
Hubert Serve ◽  
Petra Hoffknecht ◽  
Wolfgang Berdel ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19011-e19011
Author(s):  
Jared Weiss ◽  
Rex W. Force ◽  
Brooke A. Pugmire ◽  
Teri Peterson ◽  
Claudio Faria ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19295-e19295
Author(s):  
Christina D Williams ◽  
Lin Gu ◽  
Vishal Vashistha ◽  
Ashlyn Press ◽  
Michael J. Kelley

e19295 Background: Immunotherapy (IO) has revolutionized the treatment paradigm for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Study objectives were to evaluate utilization of IO as first-line (1L) therapy and compare clinical characteristics between patients receiving IO and those receiving CT in 1L setting. Methods: Using the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs corporate data warehouse, patients with stage IV NSCLC diagnosed 2012-2017 and initiated non-targeted systemic therapy within 120 days of diagnosis were selected. Unadjusted descriptive statistics were used to compare patient characteristics, inpatient and outpatient clinic visits, and prevalence of select adverse events (AE) between patients receiving IO monotherapy and CT. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression approaches with and without propensity score matching (PSM) were used for overall survival (OS) analyses. OS was calculated from treatment initiation date to death or end of study period in June 2019. Results: 4609 patients were included in the analysis: 3.4% (n = 156) received IO monotherapy, 96% (n = 4426) received CT, and 0.6% (n = 27) received IO+CT (IO+CT not included in analysis). IO patients were older than CT patients (median age 69 vs. 66 years, p < 0.0001) and more frequently resided in the Midwest and West regions whereas CT patients were more likely to live in the Northeast and South (p = 0.0024). There were no significant differences in IO and CT by other demographic and clinical characteristics. Estimated median OS was 7.5 months (95% CI 7.2-7.7) for CT and 7.9 months (95% CI 5.3-12.6) for IO patients. The unadjusted HR for IO compared to CT patients was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.98). With 1:4 PSM (144 and 559 patients matched in the IO and CT groups, respectively), the HR was 0.75 (95% CI 0.60-0.93). The mean number of outpatient visits for IO and CT patients were 47 and 36, respectively (p = 0.003). No difference in number of hospitalizations or length of hospital stays between the two groups was observed. Common AEs in the IO group were dyspnea (58%), colitis/enterocolitis (42%), and anemia (30%). Common AEs among CT patients were colitis/enterocolitis (36%), anemia (32%), and nausea/vomiting (31%). Conclusions: In a real-world 1L setting among veterans with NSCLC, improvement in OS was observed among patients receiving IO monotherapy compared to those receiving CT, and IO patients had a greater number of outpatient visits. Continued assessment of treatment patterns and impact of IO are needed as the use of IO continues to expand.


Lung Cancer ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Mir ◽  
Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette ◽  
Julie Giroux ◽  
Jeanne Chapron ◽  
Jérôme Alexandre ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 1886-1892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodryg Ramlau ◽  
Petr Zatloukal ◽  
Jacek Jassem ◽  
Paul Schwarzenberger ◽  
Sergei V. Orlov ◽  
...  

PurposeThis study evaluated whether the combination of the synthetic rexinoid bexarotene with first-line cisplatin/vinorelbine therapy provides additional survival benefit in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and MethodsPatients with stage IIIB with pleural effusion or stage IV NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1 were randomly assigned to open-label bexarotene 400 mg/m2/d with cisplatin/vinorelbine or to cisplatin/vinorelbine alone. Antilipid agents were initiated on or before day 1 in the bexarotene arm. Primary efficacy end point was overall survival. Primary, secondary and supportive efficacy analyses were conducted.ResultsA total of 623 patients (312 control, 311 bexarotene) were enrolled. Overall, no significant difference in survival occurred between the two treatment groups. However, an unplanned retrospective analysis showed that a subpopulation of bexarotene patients (n = 98 of 306) who experienced National Cancer Institute grade 3/4 hypertriglyceridemia had longer median survival compared with control patients (12.3 v 9.9 months; log-rank P = .08). Within that subgroup, those who benefited the most included males, smokers, those with stage IV disease, and those with a 6-month prior weight loss of 5% or more. Incidence, type and severity of grade 3/4 adverse events were comparable between arms, except for leukopenia (higher in chemotherapy arm) and hyperlipemia, hypothyroidism, dyspnea, and headache (higher in chemotherapy/bexarotene arm).ConclusionThe addition of bexarotene to first-line chemotherapy did not increase survival in patients with advanced NSCLC. However, a subgroup (32%) of bexarotene-treated patients developing high-grade hypertriglyceridemia appeared to have better survival (12.3 months) than controls; thus triglyceride response may be a biomarker of survival benefit with bexarotene.


2017 ◽  
Vol 376 (25) ◽  
pp. 2415-2426 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. Carbone ◽  
Martin Reck ◽  
Luis Paz-Ares ◽  
Benjamin Creelan ◽  
Leora Horn ◽  
...  

Lung ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 184 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kensuke Kataoka ◽  
Ryujiro Suzuki ◽  
Hiroyuki Taniguchi ◽  
Yasunobu Noda ◽  
Joe Shindoh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document