Colposcopic histopathology results of patients over 50: Is HPV genotyping useful?

Author(s):  
Sevgi Koc ◽  
Dilek Yuksel ◽  
Fulya Kayikcioglu
Keyword(s):  
BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanie Gaete ◽  
Aviane Auguste ◽  
Bernard Bhakkan ◽  
Jessica Peruvien ◽  
Cecile Herrmann-Storck ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cervical cancer is the fourth cancer worldwide. The Human Papilloma Virus is responsible for 99% of the cases but the distribution of its genotypes varies among populations. We aimed to identify HPV genotypes distribution in women with grade 2/3 cervical intraepithelial dysplasia or invasive cervical cancer in Guadeloupe, a French Caribbean territory with a population mainly of African descent. Methods We used paraffin-embedded tumors for viral DNA extraction from women diagnosed between 2014 and 2016 and identified by the population-based cancer registry. The HPV Genotyping was performed with the InnoLIPA HPV Genotyping Extra kit®. Results Overall, 213 samples out of the 321 eligible records were analyzed. The HPV status was positive for 94% of the cases. The five most common oncogenic HPV genotypes were HPV31 (47%), HPV33 (38%), HPV16 (32%), HPV44 (31%) and HPV26 (28%). HPV18 was found in only in 5% of the cases. Among the studied cases, 94% had multiple infections. More than 60% of single infections were HPV16-related, accounting for 35% of HPV16 infections. Conclusions These results show a different distribution of oncogenic HPVs in Guadeloupe with “31 >  33 > 16” and a high frequency of multiple infections. Despite a lower coverage, the nine-valent vaccine is nevertheless adequate.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110109
Author(s):  
Binhua Dong ◽  
Huachun Zou ◽  
Xiaodan Mao ◽  
Yingying Su ◽  
Hangjing Gao ◽  
...  

Background: China’s Fujian Cervical Pilot Project (FCPP) transitioned cervical cancer screening from high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) nongenotyping to genotyping. We investigated the clinical impact of this introduction, comparing performance indicators between HR-HPV genotyping combined with cytology screening (HR-HPV genotyping period) and the previous HR-HPV nongenotyping combined with cytology screening (HR-HPV nongenotyping period). Methods: A retrospective population-based cohort study was performed using data from the FCPP for China. We obtained data for the HR-HPV nongenotyping period from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2013, and for the HR-HPV genotyping period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2016. Propensity score matching was used to match women from the two periods. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess factors associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse (CIN2+). The primary outcome was the incidence of CIN2+ in women aged ⩾25 years. Performance was assessed and included consistency, reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and cost. Results: Compared with HR-HPV nongenotyping period, in the HR-HPV genotyping period, more CIN2+ cases were identified at the initial screening (3.06% versus 2.32%; p < 0.001); the rate of colposcopy referral was higher (10.87% versus 6.64%; p < 0.001); and the hazard ratio of CIN2+ diagnosis was 1.64 (95% confidence interval, 1.43–1.88; p < 0.001) after controlling for health insurance status and age. The total costs of the first round of screening (US$66,609 versus US$65,226; p = 0.293) were similar during the two periods. Higher screening coverage (25.95% versus 25.19%; p = 0.007), higher compliance with age recommendations (92.70% versus 91.69%; p = 0.001), lower over-screening (4.92% versus 10.15%; p < 0.001), and reduced unqualified samples (cytology: 1.48% versus 1.73%, p = 0.099; HR-HPV: 0.57% versus 1.34%, p < 0.001) were observed in the HR-HPV genotyping period. Conclusions: Introduction of an HR-HPV genotyping assay in China could detect more CIN2+ lesions at earlier stages and improve programmatic indicators. Evidence suggests that the introduction of HR-HPV genotyping is likely to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer in China.


2009 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Carlos Roa ◽  
Patricia Garcia ◽  
Jorge Gomez ◽  
Wanda Fernández ◽  
Fancy Gaete ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Xu ◽  
Heng Yu ◽  
Michael S. Akhras ◽  
Shu-Jen Han ◽  
Sebastian Osterfeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. S16-S20 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.T. Geraets ◽  
D.A.M. Heideman ◽  
M.N.C. de Koning ◽  
P.J.F. Snijders ◽  
C.J.L.M. Meijer ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 194 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. G. V. Quint ◽  
G. Scholte ◽  
L. J. van Doorn ◽  
B. Kleter ◽  
P. H. M. Smits ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.-Y. Lee ◽  
S.-M. Kim ◽  
S.-Y. Rim ◽  
H.-S. Choi ◽  
C.-S. Park ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Marcante ◽  
P. Panozzo ◽  
N. Pianalto ◽  
G. Cavedon
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document